Making Students Responsible for Grammar Learning: A Report on a Learner-Centered Technique Aimed at Accuracy
Abstract
Learner-centered approaches to learning and teaching alongside education for sustainable development (ESD) emphasize the education of engaged and active global citizens (UNESCO, 2017). The development of students’ reflective skills and metacognitive strategies is the center of this study that aims at investigating the learner language of a group of adult learners at an upper-intermediate level. It sets out to investigate to what extent learners are able to notice and correct their errors after reflecting on their spoken production. Moreover, it seeks to examine the students’ perception of their self-reflection and their attitude towards using speaking tasks for grammar learning. Comparative error analysis showed that the participants were able to amend 34.6% of total errors. These were made mainly in noun phrases (30% of total errors in Task 1 and 31% in Task 3) and verb phrases (40% of total errors in both tasks). Although no general conclusions could be drawn, the results seem to suggest that after critical, evidence-based reflection, the participants were able to notice and correct some errors, namely, in determination and the use of the past simple. The results of the survey analysis showed that all participants reported on an improved awareness of the gaps in their interlanguage, and all of them considered speaking tasks beneficial to grammar development. The study indicates that carefully planned, repeated speaking tasks might be helpful for learners’ language processing, consolidation of their grammatical knowledge and the improvement of their reflection skills and metacognitive strategies.
Keywords
grammar; error analysis; repeated speaking tasks; learner autonomy; metacognitive strategies; learner-centered approach
References
Benson, P. (2012). Learner-Centred Teaching. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Authors), The Cambridge guide to pedagogy and practice in second language teaching (pp. 30–37). Cambridge University Press.
Brown, D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (3rd ed.). Longman.
Bygate, M. (1998). Task as context for the framing, reframing and unframing of language. System, 27(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(98)00048-7
Cambridge Assessment English. Cambridge English (29 March 2018). Did I say that? Speaking at B2 level [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnXRJzpa_aI
Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching (CELT). Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. CELT. Retrieved June 5, 2020 from https://www.celt.iastate.edu/teaching/effective-teaching-practices/revised-blooms-taxonomy
Corder, S. P. (1975). Error analysis, interlanguage and second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 8, 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800002822
Desjarlais, M. & Smith, P. (n.d.). A comparative analysis of reflection and self-assessment, 3–15. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7ec1/4fa3d09e8906c12afeebb6d163c05ba42c9f.pdf
Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83. http://www.personal.psu.edu/kej1/APLNG_493/old_site/ellis.pdf
Ellis, R. (2009). Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge and instruction. In Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching. Multilingual Matters.
Ellis, R. (2004). Principles of instructed language learning. System, 33(2), 209–224.
Ellis, R., & Burkhuizen, G. (2005). Analysing learner language. Oxford University Press.
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.354
Griffiths, C., & Oxford, R. L. (2013). The twenty-first century landscape of language learning strategies: Introduction to this special issue. System, 43, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.system.2013.12.009
Kim, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2012). The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: What needs to be repeated during task-based interaction? System, 41(3), 829–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.08.005
Levelt, W. J. M (1995). The ability to speak: From intentions to spoken words. European Review, 3(1), 13–25. https://www.mpi.nl/world/materials/publications/leelt/Levelt_The_Ability_to_speak_1995.pdf
Ortega, L. (2015). Understanding second language acquisition. Routledge.
Oxford, R. L. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Oxford, R. L. (2011). Strategies for learning a second or foreign language. Language Teaching, 44(2), 167–180. doi:10.1017/s0261444810000492
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman: Longman Group Limited.
Thornbury, S. (2019). Teaching grammar to adults. Part of the Cambridge Papers in ELT series. Cambridge University Press.
Thornbury, S. (2005). Uncovering grammar. (2nd ed.) Macmillan Education.
The United Nations. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987ourcommon-future.pdf
Truman, M. (2008). Self-correction Strategies in Distance Language Learning. In S. Hurd & T. Lewis (Eds.), Language learning strategies in independent settings. Multilingual Matters.
Straková, Z. (2013). Introduction to teaching English as a Foreign Language. Vydavateľstvo Prešovskej univerzity v Prešove.
Straková, Z., & Cimermanová, I. (2018). Critical thinking development—A necessary step in higher education transformation towards sustainability. Sustainability, 10(10), 3366. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103366
United Nations. (n.d.) Education: Sustainable development knowledge platform. United Nations. Retrieved June 10, 2020 from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/topics/education
United Nations. 2015. Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations. http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2017). Education for sustainable development goals learning objectives. https://www.iau-hesd.net/sites/default/files/documents/247444e.pdf
University of Prešov in Prešov, Slovakia Slovakia
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1475-6987
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Holders of the submitted texts are the Authors. The Reader is granted the rights to use the material available in the TAPSLA websites and pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution - Share Alike (CC BY-SA 4.0). The user is free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
