Phonotactic Probabilities and Sub-syllabic Segmentation in Language Learning
Abstract
High phonotactic probabilities are known to exert a facilitative effect on word learning in children and adults in their first language. The present study was designed to investigate the role of phonotactic probabilities when learning a foreign language. Focusing on Austrian and Korean learners of English, we investigated two hypotheses related to phonotactic frequency effects: (1) High-frequency segments have more deeply entrenched phonetic representations, with more automatized pronunciation patterns, rendering phonetic learning of homophonous segments more difficult; (2) High-frequency segments are associated with higher phonetic variability in the first language, which can facilitate phonetic learning in a foreign language. Additionally, the locus of phoneme/ bigram frequency effects was analyzed in relation to left-branching and right-branching syllable structure in German and Korean. We found that proximity to English voice-onset time is correlated with phoneme and bigram frequencies in the first language, but results varied by learner group. Sub-syllabic segmentation of the first language was also shown to be an influential factor. Our study is grounded in research on frequency effects and combines its central premise with phonetic learning in a foreign
language. The results show a tight relationship between first language statistical probabilities and phonetic learning in a foreign language.
Keywords
Austrian German; English as a Foreign Language (EFL); frequency distribution; Korean; sub-syllabic segmentation
References
Abramson, A. S., & Whalen, D. H. (2017). Voice onset time (VOT) at 50: Theoretical and practical issues in measuring voicing distinctions. Journal of Phonetics, 63, 75–86.
Ahn, K. (2011). Conceptualization of American English native speaker norms: A case study of an English language classroom in South Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12, 691–702.
Allen, J. S., Miller, J. L., & DeSteno, D. (2003). Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(544). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1528172
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). {lme4}: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R Package version 1.1–7.
Beckman, J., Helgason, P., McMurray, B., & Ringen, C. (2011). Rate effects on Swedish VOT: Evidence for phonological overspecification. Journal of Phonetics, 39(1), 39–49.
Berg, T., & Koops, C. (2010). The interplay of left- and right-branching effects: A phonotactic analysis of Korean syllable structure. Lingua, 120(1), 35–49.
Berry, J., & Moyle, M. (2011). Covariation among vowel height effects on acoustic measures. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130, EL 365.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2019). Praat, http://www.praat.org (Version 6.0.46).
Brysbaert, M., Buchmeier, M., Conrad, M., Jacobs, A. M., Boelte, J., & Boehl, A. (2011). The word frequency effect: A review of recent developments and implications for the coice of frequency estimates in German. Experimental Psychology, 58(5), 412.
Bybee, J. (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, J. (2002). Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change, 14, 261–290.
Bybee, J. (2007). Frequency of use and the organisation of language. Oxford University Press.
Chang, C. B., & Kwon, S. (2020). The contributions of crosslinguistic influence and individual differences to nonnative speech perception. Languages, 5(4), 49.
Cho, Y.-H. (2005). VOT and its effect on the syllable duration in Busan Korean. Speech Sciences, 12(3), 153–164.
Chodroff, E., Godfrey, J., Khudanpur, S., & Wilson, C. (2015). Structured variability in acoustic realization: A corpus study of voice onset time in American English stops. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences.
Council of Europe. (2018). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Companion volume with new descriptors.
Davidson, L. (2016). Variability in the implementation of voicing in American English obstruents. Journal of Phonetics, 545, 35–50.
Dobson, A. J. (2002). An introduction to generalized linear models. Chapman & Hall/ CRC.
Docherty, G. J., Watt, D. J. L., Llamas, C., Hall, D. J., & Nycz, J. (2011). Variation in voice onset time along the Scottish-English border. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 591–594.
Esposito, A. (2002). On vowel height and consonantal voicing effects: Data from Italian. Phonetica, 59, 197–231.
Everett, C. (2018). The similar rates of occurrence of consonants across the world’s languages: A quantitative analysis of phonetically transcribed word lists. Language Sciences, 69, 125–135.
Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage Publications.
Fischer-Jørgensen, E. (1980). Temporal relations in Danish tautosyllabic CV sequences with stop consonants. Annu. Rep. Inst. Phonet. (University of Copenhagen), 14, 207–261.
Forstmeier, W., & Schielzeth, H. (2011). Cryptic multiple hypotheses testing in linear models: Overestimated effect sizes and the winner's curse. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65, 47–55.
Fricke, M., Baese-Berk, M., & Goldrick, M. (2016). Dimensions of similarity in the mental lexicon. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(5), 639–645.
Frisch, S. A., Large, N. R., & Pisoni, D. B. (2000). Perception of wordlikeness: Effects of segment probability and length on the processing of nonwords. Journal of Memory & Language, 42, 481–496.
Garofolo, J., Lamel, L., Fisher, W., Fiscus, J., Pallett, D., & Dahlgren, N. (1993). TIMIT: Acoustic-phonetic continuous speech vorpus. Linguistic Data Consortium.
Gilquin, G., de Cock, S., & Granger, S. (2010). Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage. Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
Goldhahn, D., Eckart, T., & Quasthoff, U. (2012). Building large monolingual dictionaries at the Leipzig Corpora Collection: From 100 to 200 languages. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 8th International Language Ressources Evaluation (LREC’12).
Grassegger, H. (1996). Koartikulatorische Einflüsse auf die Produktion von Anlautplosiven bei österreichischen (steirischen) Sprechern. In A. Braun (Ed.), Untersuchungen zu Stimme und Sprache – Papers on speech and voice (pp. 19–32). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.
Hunnicutt, L., & Morris, P. (2016). Pre-voicing and aspiration in Southern American English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 22, 215–224.
Ishikawa, S. (2013). The ICNALE and sophisticated contrastive interlanguage analysis of Asian learners of English. In S. Ishikawa (Ed.), Learner corpus studies in Asia and the world (pp. 91–118). Kobe, Japan: Kobe University.
Jucker, A., S., M., & Smith, S. (2006). GLBCC (Giessen – Long Beach Chaplin Corpus). In Oxford Text Archive.
Kang, Y. (2014). Voice onset time merger and development of tonal contrast in Seoul Korean stops: A corpus study. Journal of Phonetics, 45, 76–90.
Kartushina, N., Hervais-Adelman, A., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Golestani, N. (2015). The effect of phonetic production training with visual feedback on the perception and production of foreign speech sounds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(2), 817–832.
Kim, J. (2015). Effects of phonotactic probabilities on syllable structure. Working Papers in LInguistics, 46(3), 1–16.
Kim, J., & Davis, C. (2002). Using Korean to investigate phonological priming effects without the influence of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 569–591.
Kim, J.-Y., & Lee, Y. (2011). A study of Korean syllable structure: Evidence from rhyming patterns in Korean contemporary rap-songs. Sociolinguistics Journal of Korea, 19, 1–22.
Kim, J. Y. (2010). L2 Korean phonology. VDM.
Klatt, D. H. (1975). Voice-onset time, frication, and aspiration in word-initial consonant clusters. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 18, 686–706.
Koenig, L. L. (2000). Laryngeral factors in voiceless consonant production in men, women, and 5-year-olds. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 1211–1228.
Lee, H. B., Jin, N., Seong, C., Jung, I., & Lee, S. (1994). An experimental phonetic study of speech rhythm in Standard Korean. Paper presented at the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP), Yokohama, Japan.
Levy, H., & Hanulikova, A. (2019). Variation in children’s vowel production: Effects of language exposure and lexical frequency. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, 10(9), 1–26.
Lipani, L. (2019). Voice onset time variation in natural southern speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 146(4). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5137433
Luce, P. A., & Large, N. R. (2001). Phonotactics, density, and entropy in spoken word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 565–581.
Luef, E. M. (2020). Development of voice onset time in an ongoing phonetic differentiation in Austrian German plosives: Reversing a near-merger. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 39(1), 79-101. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfs-2019-2006
Maddieson, I. (1984). Patterns of sounds. Cambridge University Press.
Marian, V., Bartolotti, J., Chabal, S., & Shook, A. (2012). CLEARPOND: Cross-linguistic easy access resource for phonological and orthographic neighborhood densities. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e43230.
Martos, G., Muñoz, A., & González, J. (2013). On the generalization of the Mahalanobis distance. In J. Ruiz-Shulcloper & G. Sanniti di Baja (Eds.), Progress in pattern recognition, image analysis, computer vision, and applications (Vol. 8258). Springer.
Moosmüller, S. (1987). Soziophonetische Variation im gegenwärtigen Wiener Deutsch: Eine empirische Untersuchung. Franz Steiner.
Moosmüller, S., & Ringen, C. (2004). Voice and aspiration in Austrian German plosives. Folia Linguistica, 38, 43–62.
Moosmüller, S., Schmid, C., & Brandstätter, J. (2015). Standard Austrian German. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 45(3), 339–348.
Morris, P. A. (2018). Rate effects on Southern American English VOT. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, 3(60), 1–10.
Mortensen, J., & Tøndering, J. (2013). The effect of vowel height on voice onset time in stop consonants in CV sequences in spontaneous Danish. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Fonetik 2013, Linköping, Sweden.
Ohala, J. J. (1983). The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. In P. F. MacNeilage (Ed.), The production of speech (pp. 73–95). Springer.
Phillips, B. (1984). Word frequency and the actuation of sound change. Language, 60(2), 320–342.
Phillips, B. (2006). Word frequency and lexical diffusion. Palgrave Macmillan.
Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition, and contrast. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency effects and the emergence of lexical structure (pp. 137–157). John Benjamins.
Port, R. (1983). Isochrony in speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73, 66.
Quinn, G. P., & Keough, M. J. (2002). Experimental designs and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press.
RStudio Team (2020). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA. http://www.rstudio.com/.
Romani, C., Galuzzi, C., Guariglia, C., & Goslin, J. (2017). Comparing phoneme frequency, age of acquisition, and loss in aphasia: Implications for phonological universals. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 34(7–8), 449–471.
Salem, N., & Hussein, S. (2019). Data dimensional reduction and principal components analysis. Procedia Computer Science, 163, 292–299.
Schoonmaker-Gates, E. (2015). On voice-onset time as a cue to foreign accent in Spanish: Native and nonnative perceptions. Hispania, 98(4), 779–791.
Schuppler, B., Hagmueller, M., Morales-Cordovilla, J. A., & Pressentheiner, H. (2014). GRASS: The Graz Corpus of Read and Spontaneous Speech. Paper presented at the 9th edition of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Schweitzer, K., Walsh, M., Calhoun, S., Schuetze, H., Moebius, B., Schweitzer, A., & Dogil, G. (2015). Exploring the relationship between intonation and the lexicon: Evidence for lexicalised storage of intonation. Speech communication, 66, 65–81.
Shin, J. Y. (2008). Phoneme and syllable frequencies of Korean based on the analysis of spontaneous speech data (Seongin jayu balhwa jaryo bunseogeul batangeuro han hangueoui eumso mit eumjeol gwallyeon bindo). Eoneocheonggakjangaeyeongu, 13(2), 193–215.
Shin, J. Y., Kiaer, J., & Cha, J. (2013). The sounds of Korean. Cambridge University Press.
Siebs, T., de Boor, H., Moser, H., & Winkler, C. (1969). Siebs deutsche Aussprache: Reine und gemäßigte Hochlautung mit Aussprachewörterbuch. de Gruyter.
Silva, D. J. (2004). Phonological mapping as dynamic: The evolving contrastive relationship between English and Korean. Linguistic Research, 21, 57–74.
Silva, D. J. (2006). Variation in voice onset time for Korean stops. Korean Linguistics, 13, 1–16.
Skarnitzl, R., & Rumlová, J. (2019). Phonetic aspects of strongly-accented Czech speakers of English. Phonetica Pragensia, 2, 109–128. https://doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2019.21
Sonderegger, M. (2015). Trajectories of voice onet time in spontaneous speech on reality TC. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences.
Stoehr, A., Benders, T., van Hell, J. G., & Fikkert, P. (2017). Second language attainment and first language attrition: The case of VOT in. immersed Dutch-German late bilinguals. Second Language Research, 33(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658317704261
Storkel, H. L. (2001). Learning new words: Phonotactic probability in language development. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 1321–1337.
Storkel, H. L., Armbruster, J., & Hogan, T. P. (2006). Differentiating phonotatic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 1175–1192.
Storkel, H. L., & Maekawa, J. (2005). A comparison of homonym and novel word learning: The role of phonotactic probability and word frequency. Journal of Child Language, 32, 827–853.
Storkel, H. L., & Rogers, M. A. (2000). The effect of probabilistic phonotactics on lexical acquisition. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 14, 407–425.
Todd, S., Pierrehumbert, J. B., & Hay, J. B. (2019). Word frequency effects in sound change as a consequence of perceptual asymmetries: An exemplar-based model. Cognition, 185, 1–20.
Vitevitch, M. S. (1997). The neighborhood characteristic of malapropisms. Language and Speech, 40, 211–228.
Vitevitch, M. S., Armbruster, J., & Chu, S. (2004). Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: Effects of phonotactic probability and onset density. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1–16.
Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1998). When words compete: Levels of processing in perception of spoken words. Psychological Science, 9, 325–329.
Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 40, 374–408.
Vitevitch, M. S., & Sommers, M. (2003). The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production. Memory & Cognition, 31, 491–504.
Vogel, A. P., Maruff, P., Snyder, P. J., & Mundt, J. C. (2009). Standardization of pitch range setting in voice acoustic analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 318–324.
Watt, D., & Yurkova, J. (2007). Voice onset time and the Scottish vowel length rule in Aberdeen English. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1521–1524.
Weber, A., & Cutler, A. (2006). First-language phonotactics in second-language listening. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(1), 597–607.
Whiteside, S. P., Hanson, A., & Cowell, P. E. (2004). Hormones and temporal components of speech: Sex differences and effects of menstrual cyclicity on speech. Neuroscience Letters, 367(1), 44–47.
Witzel, N., Witzel, J., & Choi, Y. (2013). The locus of the masked onset priming effect: Evidence from Korean. The Mental Lexicon, 8, 339–352.
Charles University in Prague Czechia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2362-2422
University College of Teacher Education Vienna/Krems Austria
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0948-9546
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Holders of the submitted texts are the Authors. The Reader is granted the rights to use the material available in the TAPSLA websites and pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution - Share Alike (CC BY-SA 4.0). The user is free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
