Bailey, K. M., & Ochsner, R. (1983). A methodological review of the diary studies: Windmill tilting or social science? In K. M. Bailey, M. H. Long, & S. Peck (Eds.), Second language acquisition studies (pp. 188–198). Newbury House.
Google Scholar

Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353–394). Longman.
Google Scholar

Bartlett, R., & Milligan, C. (2015). What is Diary Method? Bloomsbury Academic. www.bloomsburycollections.com.
Google Scholar

Brown, A. L. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 453–482). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar

Brown, A. L. (1988). Metacognition: The development of selective attention strategies for learning from texts. In H. Singer & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 501–526). International Reading Association.
Google Scholar

Brown, A. L., Armbruster, B. B., & Baker, L. (1986). The role of metacognition in reading and studying. In J. Orasanu (Ed.), Reading comprehension: From theory to practice (pp. 49–73). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar

Brown, R., Pressley, M., Van Meter, P., & Schuder, T. (1996). A quasi-experimental validation of transactional strategy instruction with low-achieving second-grade students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 18–37.
Google Scholar

Carrell, P. L., Pharis, B. G., & Liberto, J. C. (1989). Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 23(4), 647–678.
Google Scholar

Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1986). A cognitive academic language learning approach: An ESL content-based curriculum. National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.
Google Scholar

Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1994). Language learner and learning strategies. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 371–392). Academic Press.
Google Scholar

Cross, D. R., & Paris, S. G. (1988). Developmental and instructional analyses of children’s metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.2.131
Google Scholar

Cubukcu, F. (2008). Enhancing vocabulary development and reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies. Issues in Educational Research, 18(1), 1–11.
Google Scholar

Dabarera, C., Renandya, W. A., & Zhang, L. J. (2014). The impact of metacognitive scaffolding and monitoring on reading comprehension. System, 42, 462–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.020
Google Scholar

Desoete, A., & Roeyers, H. (2003). Can off-line metacognition enhance mathematical problem solving? Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 188–200.
Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1933). How we think (2nd ed.). Heath. (Original work published 1910).
Google Scholar

Devine, J. (1988). A case study of two readers: Models of reading and reading performance. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 127–139). Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Flavell, J. H. (1978). Metacognitive development. In J. M. Scandura & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Structural / process theories of complex human behavior (pp. 213–245). Sijthoff and Noordoff.
Google Scholar

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.
Google Scholar

Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.), Children’s oral communication skills (pp. 35–60). Academic Press.
Google Scholar

Flavell, J. H. (1985). Cognitive development (2nd. ed.). Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar

Fung, I. Y. Y., Wilkinson, I. A. G., & Moore, D. W. (2003). L1-assisted reciprocal teaching to improve ESL students’ comprehension of English expository text. Learning and Instruction, 13(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00033-0
Google Scholar

Gabryś-Barker, D. (2016). Caring and sharing in the foreign language classroom: On a positive classroom climate. In D. Gabryś-Barker & D. Gałajda (Eds.), Positive psychology perspectives on foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 155–174). Springer. https://doi.org.10.1007/978-3-319-32954-3
Google Scholar

Garner, R. (1988). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Ablex.
Google Scholar

Geladari, A., & Konstantinos, M. (2010). A record of poor Bilingual Readers’ approaches to narrative texts and strategy use in L2. International Journal of Learning, 17, 151–164. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v17i07/47153
Google Scholar

Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. Longman.
Google Scholar

Guthrie, J. T., & Klauda, S. L. (2014). Effects of classroom practices on reading comprehension, engagement, and motivations for adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly, 49, 387–416. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.81
Google Scholar

Guthrie, J. T., & Klauda, S. L. (2016). Engagement and motivational processes in reading. In P. Afflerbach (Ed.), Handbook of individual differences in reading: Reader, text, and context (pp. 41–53). Routledge.
Google Scholar

Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2017). Literacy engagement and motivation: Rationale, research, teaching, and assessment. In D. Lapp & D. Fisher (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (pp. 57–84). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315650555-3
Google Scholar

Hennessey, M. G. (1999, March 28–31). Probing the dimensions of metacognition: Implications for conceptual change teaching-learning [Conference session]. The Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA.
Google Scholar

Hosenfeld, C. (1977). A preliminary investigation of the reading strategies of successful and nonsuccessful second language learners. System, 5(2), 110–123.
Google Scholar

Howell-Richardson, C., & Parkinson, B. (1988). Learner diaries: Possibilities and pitfalls. In P. Grunwell (Ed.), Applied linguistics in society (pp. 74–79). CILT/BAAL.
Google Scholar

Huey, E. B. (1968). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. MIT Press. (Original work published 1908).
Google Scholar

Kidd, R., & Marquardson, B. (1994). Secondary sourcebook for integrating ESL and content instruction using the Foresee Approach. Curriculum Support Document. Manitoba Education and Training Winnipeg, Manitoba.
Google Scholar

Koukourikou, M., Manoli, P., & Griva, E. (2018). Explicit collaborative reading strategy instruction: A pilot intervention in the EFL context. Research Papers in Language Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 195–210.
Google Scholar

Kusiak, M. (2001). The effect of metacognitive strategy training on reading comprehension and metacognitive knowledge. In S. Foster-Cohen & A. Niżegorodcew (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook, Vol. 1 (pp. 255–274). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Google Scholar

Markman, E. M. (1981). Comprehension monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.), Children’s oral communication skills. Academic Press.
Google Scholar

McDonough, J., & McDonough, S. (1997). Research methods for English language teachers. Arnold.
Google Scholar

McKay, S. L. (2009). Introspective techniques. In J. Heigham & R. A. Croker (Eds.), Qualitataive research in applied linguistics. A practical introduction (pp. 220–241). Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar

Nejad, B. S., & Mahmoodi-Shahrebabaki, M. (2015). Effects of metacognitive strategy instruction on the reading comprehension of English language learners through Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach (CALLA). International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, 3(2), 133–164.
Google Scholar

Oxford, R. L., & Leaver, B. L. (1996). A synthesis of strategy instruction for language learners. In R. L. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 227–246). Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
Google Scholar

Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1986). Interactive teaching to promote independent learning from text. Reading Teacher, 39(8), 771–777.
Google Scholar

Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293–316.
Google Scholar

Paris, S. G., & Lindauer, B.K. (1982). The development of cognitive skills during childhood. In B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 333–349). Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar

Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15–51). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar

Pavlenko, A. (2007). Autobiographic narratives as data in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 28, 289–322.
Google Scholar

Pressley, M. (2001). Comprehension instruction: What makes sense now, what might make sense soon. Reading Online, 5(2). http://www.readingonline.org/articles/art_index.asp?HREF=/articles/handbook/pressley/index.html
Google Scholar

Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P. B., Gaskins, I., Schuder, T., Bergman, J. L., Almasi, J., & Brown, J. R. (1992). Beyond direct explanation: Transactional instruction of reading comprehension strategies. The Elementary School Journal, 92(5), 511–553.
Google Scholar

Rastegar, M., Mehrabi Kermani, E., & Khabir, M. (2017). The relationship between metacognitive reading strategies use and reading comprehension achievement of EFL learners. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 7, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2017.72006
Google Scholar

Salataci, R., & Akyel, A. (2002). Possible effects of strategy instruction on L1 and L2 reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14(1), 1–17. http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/April2002/salatci/salatci.html
Google Scholar

Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Papers and Publications. Paper 40. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/edpsychpapers/40
Google Scholar

Stauffer, R. G. (1969). Directing reading maturity as a cognitive process. Harper and Row.
Google Scholar

Taboada Barber, A., & Klauda, S. L. (2020). How reading motivation and engagement enable reading achievement: Policy implications policy insights. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732219893385
Google Scholar

Thorndike, E. L. (1917). Reading as reasoning: A study of mistakes in paragraph reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 8, 323–332.
Google Scholar

Yang, X., & Zhang, W. (2002). The correlation between metacognition and EFL reading comprehension of Chinese college students. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 34, 213–218.
Google Scholar

Wigfield, A., Mason-Singh, A., Ho, A. N., & Guthrie, J. T. (2014). Intervening to improve children’s reading motivation and comprehension: Concept-oriented reading instruction. In S. A. Karabenick & T. C. Urdan (Eds.), Motivational interventions (Advances in motivation and achievement, Volume 18) (pp. 37–70). Emerald Group.
Google Scholar

Wilczyńska, W., & Michońska-Stadnik, A. (2010). Metodologia badań w glottodydaktyce. Wprowadzenie. Avalon.
Google Scholar

Veenman, M. V. J. (2005). The assessment of metacognitive skills: What can be learned from multimethod designs? In C. Artelt & B. Moschner (Eds.), Lernstrategien und Metakognition: Implikationen für Forschung und Praxis (pp. 75–97). Waxmann.
Google Scholar

Zhang, L. J. (2002). Exploring EFL reading as a metacognitive experience: Reader awareness and reading performance. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 12, 65–90.
Google Scholar

Zhang, L., & Seepho, S. (2013). Metacognitive strategy use and academic reading achievement: Insights from a Chinese context. Electronic Journal of Foreign Languages Teaching, 10, 54–69.
Google Scholar