AbuSeileek, A., & Abualsha’r, A. (2014). Using peer computer-mediated corrective feedback to support EFL learners’ writing. Language Learning & Technology, 18(1), 76–95. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/february2014/abuseileekabualshar.pdf
Google Scholar

Allen, D., & Katayama, A. (2016). Relative second language proficiency and the giving and receiving of written peer feedback. System, 56(1), 96–106.
Google Scholar

Anson, C. M. (2006). Can’t touch this: Reflections on the servitude of computers as readers. Machine scoring of student essays. In P. Freitag Ericsson & R. Haswell (Eds.), Machine scoring of student essays (pp. 38–56). Logan, Utah: Utah State University Press.
Google Scholar

Bijami, M., Kashef, S. H., & Nejad, M. S. (2013). Peer feedback in learning English writing: Advantages and disadvantages. Journal of Studies in Education, 3(4), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v3i4.4314
Google Scholar

Caulk, N. (1994). Comparing teacher and student responses to written work. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 181–188.
Google Scholar

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.
Google Scholar

Chen, C. E., & Cheng, W. (2008). Beyond the design of automated writing evaluation: Pedagogical practices and perceived learning effectiveness in EFL writing classes. Language Learning and Technology, 12(2), 94–112.
Google Scholar

Cheng, G. (2017). The impact of online automated feedback on students’ reflective journal writing in an EFL course. The Internet and Higher Education, 34, 18–27.
Google Scholar

Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2005). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers & Education, 48, 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.004
Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Google Scholar

Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., McCarthey, S., Vojak, C., & Kline, S. (2011). Technology-mediated writing assessments: Principles and processes. Computers and Composition, 28, 79–96.
Google Scholar

Dikli, S., & Bleyle, S. (2014). Automated Essay Scoring feedback for second language writers: How does it compare to instructor feedback? Assessing Writing, 22, 1–17.
Google Scholar

Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: a review. Studies in Higher Education, 24, 331–350.
Google Scholar

Ellis, M. J. (2011). Peer feedback on writing: Is on-line actually better than on-paper? Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 5(1), A88–A99.
Google Scholar

Ferris, D. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA: Intersections and practical applications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 191–201.
Google Scholar

Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20, 304–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007
Google Scholar

Goldstein, L. M. (2004). Questions and answers about teacher written commentary and student revision: Teachers and students working together. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), 63–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.006
Google Scholar

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Google Scholar

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39, 83–101.
Google Scholar

Ion, G., Barrera-Corominas, A., & Tomàs-Folch, M. (2016). Written peer-feedback to enhance students’ current and future learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in High Education, 13(15). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0017-y
Google Scholar

Keh, C. L. (1990). Feedback in the writing process: a model and methods for implementation. ELT Journal, 44(4), 294–304.
Google Scholar

Kramer, M. G., Leggett, G., & Mead, D. (1995). Prentice hall handbook for writers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar

Kulkarni, C., Bernstein, M. S., & Klemmer, S. (2015). Peer studio: Rapid peer feedback emphasizes revision and improves performance. Behavior, 2(1), 14–18.
Google Scholar

Kurt, G., & Atay, D. (2007). The effects of peer feedback on the writing anxiety of prospective Turkish teachers of EFL. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 3(1), 12–23. http://eku.comu.edu.tr/index/3/1/gkurt_datay.pdf
Google Scholar

Li, J, Link, S., & Hegelheimer, V. (2015). Rethinking the role of automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback in ESL writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 1–18.
Google Scholar

Lin, W.-H., & Yang, S. C. (2011). Exploring students’ perceptions of integrating Wiki technology and peer feedback into English writing courses. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(2), 88–103. http://education.waikato.ac.nz/research/files/etpc/files/2011v10n2dial1.pdf
Google Scholar

Liu, M., & Chai, Y. (2009). Attitudes towards peer review and reaction to peer feedback in Chinese EFL writing classrooms. TESL Reporter, 40(1), 33–50.
Google Scholar

Liu, N. F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279–290.
Google Scholar

Lu, R., & Bol, L. (2007). A Comparison of anonymous versus identifiable e-Peer review on college student writing performance and the extent of critical feedback. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(2), 100–115.
Google Scholar

Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002.
Google Scholar

Miao, Y., Badger, R., & Zhen, Y. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179–200.
Google Scholar

Min, H. T. (2006). The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 118–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003.
Google Scholar

Nobles, S., & Paganucci, L. (2015). Do digital writing tools deliver? Student perceptions of writing quality using digital tools and online writing environments. Computers and Composition, 38, 16–31.
Google Scholar

Philips, S. M. (2007). Automated essay scoring: A literature review (SAEE research series #30). Kelowna, BC: Society for the Advancement of Excellence Education.
Google Scholar

Rollinson, P. (1998). Peer response and revision in an ESL writing group: A case study. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Unpublished PhD thesis.
Google Scholar

Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci003.
Google Scholar

Shermis, M. D., & Burstein, J. (Eds.). (2003). Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Google Scholar

Shintani, N. (2015). The effects of computer-mediated synchronous and asynchronous direct corrective feedback on writing: A case study. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.993400.
Google Scholar

Stanley, J. (1992). Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 217–233.
Google Scholar

Sterna, L. A., & Solomo, A. (2006). Effective faculty feedback: The road less traveled. Assessing Writing, 11, 22–41.
Google Scholar

Stevenson, M., & Phakiti, A. (2014). The effects of computer-generated feedback on the quality of writing. Assessing Writing, 19, 51–65.
Google Scholar

Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–276. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1170598
Google Scholar

Ullmann, T. D. (2019). Automated analysis of reflection in writing: Validating machine learning approaches. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 29, 217–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-019-00174-2
Google Scholar

Vardi, I. (2009). The relationship between feedback and change in tertiary student writing in the disciplines. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(3), 350–361. http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe
Google Scholar

Wang, W. (2014). Students’ perceptions of rubric-referenced peer feedback on EFL writing: A longitudinal inquiry. Assessing Writing, 19, 80–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.008
Google Scholar

Warschauer, M., & Ware, J. (2006). Automated writing evaluation: Defining the classroom research agenda. Language Teaching Research, 10(2), 1–24.
Google Scholar

Winne, P. H., & Butler, D. L. (1994). Student cognition in learning from teaching. In T. Husen & T. Postlewaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (2nd ed.) (pp. 5738–5745). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
Google Scholar

Wyrick, J. (2008). Steps to writing well. Beijing: Peking University Press.
Google Scholar

Xie, Y., Ke, F., & Sharma, P. (2008). The effect of peer feedback for blogging on college students’ reflective learning processes. Internet and Higher Education, 11, 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.11.001.
Google Scholar

Yu, S. & Lee, I. (2015). Understanding EFL students’ participation in group peer feedback of L2 writing: A case study from an activity theory perspective. Language Teaching Research, 19(5), 572–593.
Google Scholar