Corpus-Assisted Analysis of Discourses on EFL Teaching Approaches

Marianna Lőrincz

doi:10.31261/TAPSLA.17700

Published: 2025-11-04

2025

Corpus-Assisted Analysis of Discourses on EFL Teaching Approaches

Marianna Lőrincz

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.31261/TAPSLA.17700

Abstract

This study explicates the lexico-semantic features of the discourses constructed by EFL student teachers regarding language teaching approaches and methods. Utilizing corpus linguistics methods, the research explores a specialized corpus comprised of reflective essays produced by forty-one EFL student teachers in the context of Ukrainian teacher education. Techniques such as keyword analysis, n-grams, collocations, and KWIK (key word in context) were sequentially applied to complement the data. The keyword profile of the corpus enabled the extraction of the main semantic fields, including approaches and methods, education and instructional processes, agents, linguistic aspects, language skills, and techniques. The n-grams analysis further detailed that the participants were familiar with a repertoire of approaches and methods. Evidence garnered from collocations and concordance analyses substantiated that the respondents self-identified with current language teaching approaches and believed in the utility of principled eclecticism. Nevertheless, a minor segment of respondents gave precedence to traditional language teaching. Despite a lexically rich representation of the semantic field of EFL approaches and methods, the related semantic field of techniques was underrepresented in the corpus, indicating challenges associated with the procedures underlying specific approaches in the instructional process. This highlights the need for guided training in the application of contemporary language teaching principles.

Keywords:

corpus linguistics , discourse, English as a Foreign Language (EFL) , approach , method , semantic field

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Lőrincz, M. (2025). Corpus-Assisted Analysis of Discourses on EFL Teaching Approaches. Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.31261/TAPSLA.17700

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The Copyright Holders of the submitted texts are the Authors. The Reader is granted the rights to use the material available in the TAPSLA websites and pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution - Share Alike (CC BY-SA 4.0). The user is free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

1. License

The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.

2. Author’s Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.

If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".

ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).

3. User Rights

Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.

4. Co-Authorship

If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.

I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.

References

Alharbi, S. H. (2017). Principled eclecticism: Approach and application in teaching writing to ESL/EFL students. English Language Teaching, 10(2), 33–39.
Google Scholar

Andon, N., & Leung, C. (2014). The role of approaches and methods in second language teacher education. In S. B. Said & L. J. Zhang (Eds.), Language teachers and teaching: Global perspectives, local initiatives (pp. 59). (Routledge Research in Education). Routledge.
Google Scholar

Arikan, A. (2006). Postmethod condition and its implications for English language teacher education. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 2(1), 1–11.
Google Scholar

Bacus, R. C. (2021). Teachers’ beliefs, praxes, and post-method pedagogy in English language teaching. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(1), 86–102. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.1.5
Google Scholar

Baker, P. (2012). Acceptable bias? Using corpus linguistics methods with critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 9(3), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.688297
Google Scholar

Baker, P. (2023). Using corpora in discourse analysis (2nd edition.). Bloomsbury.
Google Scholar

Basturkmen, H. (2012). Review of research into the correspondence between language teachers’ stated beliefs and practices. System, 40, 282–295.
Google Scholar

Bastidas, J. A. (2022). Are language teaching methods really dead as some TESOL gurus have proclaimed? Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 24(2), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v24n2.96952
Google Scholar

Bell, D. M. (2007). Do teachers think that methods are dead? ELT Journal, 61(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm006
Google Scholar

Berger, J.-L., Girardet, C., Vaudroz, C., & Crahay, M. (2018). Teaching experience, teachers’ beliefs, and self-reported classroom management practices: A coherent network. Sage Open, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017754119
Google Scholar

Brezina, V. (2018). Statistics in corpus linguistics: A practical guide. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316410899
Google Scholar

Brezina, V., McEnery, T., & Wattam, S. (2015). Collocations in context: a new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(2), 139–173. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.2.01bre
Google Scholar

Brown, H. D. (2002). English language teaching in the “Post-Method” era: Towards better diagnosis, treatment, and assessment. In J. C. Richards, & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching (pp. 9–18). Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Cammarata, L. (Ed.). (2016). Content-based foreign language teaching: Curriculum and pedagogy for developing advanced thinking and literacy skills (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203850497
Google Scholar

Cehan, A. (2014). In the wake of method. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 7(4), 23–30.
Google Scholar

Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed.). Heinle & Heinle.
Google Scholar

Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D., & Snow, M. A. (Eds.). (2014). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (4th ed.). National Geographic Learning/Heinle CENGAGE Learning.
Google Scholar

Chen, X. L., Zou, D., Xie, H. R., & Su, F. (2021). Twenty-five years of computer-assisted language learning: A topic modeling analysis. Language Learning & Technology, 25(3), 151–185. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/73454
Google Scholar

Clarke, M. (2008). Language teacher identities: Co-constructing discourse and community. Multilingual Matters.
Google Scholar

Curtis, A. (2017). Methods and methodologies for language teaching: The centrality of context. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Google Scholar

Cushing-Leubner, J., & Bigelow, M. (2014). Principled eclecticism and the holistic approach to language teaching and learning. In S. Çelik (Ed.), Approaches and principles in English as a foreign language (EFL) education (pp. 254–263). Egiten.
Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z. (2013). Communicative language teaching in the twenty-first century: The ‘Principled Communicative Approach’. In J. Arnold & T. Murphey (Eds.), Meaningful interaction: Earl Stevick’s influence on language teaching (pp. 161–171). Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Droździał-Szelest, K. (2013). Methods in language teaching: Do we still need them? In K. Droździał-Szelest & M. Pawlak (Eds.), Psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic perspectives on second language learning and teaching: Studies in honor of Waldemar Marton (pp. 177–197). Springer.
Google Scholar

Farrell, T. S., & Bennis, K. (2013). Reflecting on ESL teacher beliefs and classroom practices: A case study. RELC Journal, 44(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688213488463
Google Scholar

Farrell, T.S., & Guz, M. (2019). ‘If I wanted to survive I had to use it’: The power of teacher beliefs on classroom practices. TESL-EJ, 22(4), 1–17.
Google Scholar

Flowerdew, L. (2013). Corpus-based discourse analysis. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 174–188). Routledge.
Google Scholar

Friginal, E., & Hardy, J. A. (Eds.). (2020). The Routledge handbook of corpus approaches to discourse analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429259982
Google Scholar

Gabrielatos, C. (2018). Keyness analysis: Nature, metrics and techniques. In C. Taylor & A. Marchi (Eds.), Corpus approaches to discourse: A critical review (pp. 225–258). Routledge.
Google Scholar

Gilakjani, A. P., & Sabouri, N. B. (2017). Teachers' beliefs in English language teaching and learning: A review of the literature. English Language Teaching, 10(4), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n4p78
Google Scholar

Hall, G. (2019). Locating methods in ELT education: perspectives and possibilities. In S. Walsh & S. Mann (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English Language Teacher Education (pp. 285–298). Routledge.
Google Scholar

Kumaravadivelu, B. (1994). The postmethod condition: (e)merging strategies for second/foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 27–48.
Google Scholar

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Levrints/ Lőrincz, M. (2022). Foreign language teachers’ knowledge base and the influence of teaching experience. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 47(4), 90–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2022v47n4.6
Google Scholar

Lőrincz, M. (2022). English language teachers’ knowledge base: An exploration of beliefs. The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 12(2), 101–117. https://www.jltl.com.tr/index.php/jltl/article/view/428
Google Scholar

Lőrincz, M. (2023). EFL student teachers’ beliefs about language teaching approaches and instructional practices. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching [e-FLT], 20(2), 167–192. https://doi.org/10.56040/mlrc2024
Google Scholar

Lőrincz, M. (2025). Introducing English lexicology: In the beginning was the word…. Ferenc Rakoczi II Transcarpathian Hungarian College of Higher Education.
Google Scholar

Lucarevschi, C. R. (2016). The role of storytelling on language learning: A literature review. Working Papers of the Linguistics Circle of the University of Victoria, 26(1), 24–44.
Google Scholar

Nagy, I. K. (2019). In between language teaching methods: Do we need (to know about) methods at all? Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, 11(3), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.2478/ausp-2019-0030
Google Scholar

Nartey, M., & Mwinlaaru, I. N. (2019). Towards a decade of synergising corpus linguistics and critical discourse analysis: a meta-analysis. Corpora, 14(2), 203–235.
Google Scholar

Partington, A., Duguid, A., & Taylor, C. (2013). Patterns and meanings in discourse: theory and practice in corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS). (Studies in corpus linguistics; No. 55). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Google Scholar

Plonsky, L., & Kim, Y. (2016). Task-based learner production: A substantive and methodological review. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190516000015
Google Scholar

Prabhu, N. S. (1990). There is no best method – why? TESOL Quarterly, 24(2), 161–176.
Google Scholar

Rahimi, M., & Naderi, F. (2014). The relationship between EFL teachers’ attitudes towards CLT and perceived difficulties of implementing CLT in language classes. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 3(3), 237–245. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.3p.237
Google Scholar

Richards, J. C. (2001). Beyond methods. In C. Candlin & N. Mercer (Eds.) English language teaching in its social context: A reader (pp. 167–179). Psychology Press.
Google Scholar

Richards, J. C. (2005). Communicative language teaching today. SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
Google Scholar

Richards, J. C. (2011). Competence and performance in language teaching. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024778.007
Google Scholar

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Riemer, N. (Ed.). (2016). The Routledge handbook of semantics. Routledge.
Google Scholar

Saville-Troike, M., & Barto, K. (2016). Introducing second language acquisition (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Scheffler, P. (2012). Theories pass. Learners and teachers remain. Applied Linguistics, 33(5), 603–607. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams062
Google Scholar

Scheffler, P. (2013). Learners’ perceptions of grammar-translation as consciousness-raising. Language Awareness, 22(3), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2012.703673
Google Scholar

Scholl, J. (2017). Reconceptualizing post-method pedagogy. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 15(3), 96–101.
Google Scholar

Swaffar, J. K., Arens, K. & Morgan, M. (1982). Teacher classroom practices: Redefining method as task hierarchy. The Modern Language Journal, 66(1), 24–33.
Google Scholar

Tarnopolsky, O. (2018). Principled pragmatism, or well-grounded eclecticism: a new paradigm in teaching English as a foreign language at Ukrainian tertiary schools? Advanced Education, 10, 5–11. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.133270
Google Scholar

Thornbury, S. (2017). Scott Thornbury’s 30 language teaching methods. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Sun, C., Wei, L., & Young, R.F. (2020). Measuring teacher cognition: Comparing Chinese EFL teachers’ implicit and explicit attitudes toward English language teaching methods. Language Teaching Research, 26(3), 382–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820903010
Google Scholar

Tang, E. L., Lee, J. C., & Chun, C. K. (2012). Development of teaching beliefs and the focus of change in the process of pre-service ESL teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(5). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2012v37n5.8
Google Scholar

Ur, P. (2013). Language-teaching method revisited. ELT Journal, 67(4), 468–474. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct041
Google Scholar

Ur, P. (2014). Where do we go from here? Method and pedagogy in language teaching. ExELL, 2(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1515/exell-2016-0001
Google Scholar

Wesely, P. M., Vyn, R., & Neubauer, D. (2021). Teacher beliefs about instructional approaches: Interrogating the notion of teaching methods. Language Teaching Research, 28(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168821992180136216882199218
Google Scholar

2025
Published: 2022-05-31

ISSN: 2450-5455

eISSN: 2451-2125

10.31261/tapsla

Publisher

Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego | University of Silesia Press

Licence CC

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Submit

Corpus-Assisted Analysis of Discourses on EFL Teaching Approaches

Abstract

Keywords:

Marianna Lőrincz

Information