https://doi.org/10.31261/fp.20874
For the present article, the statement that the foundation, or rather legitimisation, of Popper’s philosophy (both his epistemology, which the present work is devoted to, and his other fields of research) is a defence of rationality (no matter whether we talk of the rationality of acting, thinking, science, or of something still different) is of crucial importance also because the process of cognition, according to Popper, is subject to rational principles. It is to the formulation of these principles, and to the proving of their existence that Popper devotes a large part of his work. The author thinks it is possible to treat his methodology of science, and the conception of the three worlds which provides an answer to the question of the relationship between body and mind and an evolutionary theory of science, as attempts to support his thesis that, in spite of man’s tendency to make mistakes, cognition is a rational process. The author of the present article demonstrates no. only that Popper strove to justify his faith in rationality; but also that his subsequent theories, perhaps with the exception of his social views, were produced as a result of the philosopher’s becoming aware that his achievements so far had failed to accomplish the desired purpose. Thus we should accept Popper s remark that his conception of the three worlds should not be treated too seriously. The conception in question is a peculiar declaration of the philosopher’s convictions, but it does not seem possible, without a fundamental restructuring of the conception itself, to use it, with significant results, for the task of solving the problems that so many scientists and philosophers grapple with. The statement that scientific theories exist as objectively as the objects of the physical world does not imply anything more than is implied by the acceptance of the thesis that scientific theories and science as such are products of the human consciousness the activity of which does not follow any rules. The purpose of science and the purpose of philosophy are, as a matter of fact, human purposes, and it is of little importance whether, in pursuing those purposes, we conjure, by means of special terminology, another world different from that of our daily experience, or we satisfy ourselves with the naive ontology based on common sense.
Download files
Citation rules
Cited by / Share
Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
Vol. 20 (2002)
Published: 2002-12-31
10.31261/fp
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
English
Język Polski