https://doi.org/10.31261/NEO.2021.33.14
The text deals with one of the challenges of linguistics, which is to effectively combine description and explanation in linguistics.
It is necessary that linguistic theories are not only capable of adequately describing their object of study within their framework, but they must also have a suitable explanatory power.
Linguistics centred around the explanation of the why of the system is called here ‘explanatory’ or ‘non-autonomous’, in contrast to ‘descriptive’ or ‘autonomous’ linguistics, which is focused on the description of the system, the distinction being based on the difference in the objects of study, the goals and the descriptive and explanatory possibilities of the theories.
From the point of view presented here, a comprehensive study of language has three main components: a general theory of what language is, a resulting theory and description, which is a function of this theory, of how language is organised, functions and has evolved in the human brain, and an explanation of the properties of language found.
The explanatory value of a general linguistic theory is a function of various elements, among others, the quantity of the primitive elements of the theory adopted and the effectiveness of Ockham’s razor principle of simplicity. It is also a function of the quality of those elements which can be drawn not only from within the system, but also from outside the system becoming in this situation logically prior to the object under study.
In science, in linguistics, one naturally needs two types of approach, two types of linguistics, descriptive/autonomous and explanatory/non-autonomous, one must first describe reality in order to explain it. But it is also certain that since the aim of science is to explain in order to reach that higher level of scientificity above pure description, it is necessary that this aim be realized in different linguistic theories within different research programs, uniting descriptivist and explanatory approaches.
Télécharger les fichiers
Règles de citation
Cité par / Partager
Références
Ameka, F., Dench, A., & Evans, N. (Eds.). (2008). Catching Language. Berlin — New York, De Gruyter Mouton.
Google Scholar
Auroux, S. (2013). Le mode d’existence de la « langue ». La linguistique, 49, 11—33.
Google Scholar
Bachelard, G. (1949/1966). Le Rationalisme appliqué (3e éd.). Paris, Presses universitaires de France.
Google Scholar
Banyś, W. (2018). Nouveaux anciens paradigmes : Approche orientée objets. Classes d’objets, Psychologie écologique et Linguistique. Neopilologica, 30, 25—41.
Google Scholar
Banyś, W. (à par.). Entre l’empirisme et le rationalisme en linguistique : distributionnalisme, théories logiques, représentations, computations. In F. Neveu, M. Fasciolo & G. Gross (Éds), Décrire une langue : objectifs et méthodes. Paris, Classiques Garnier.
Google Scholar
Bateman, J., et al. (2019). Systemic functional linguistics and computation new directions, new challenges. In S. A. Thompson et al. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics (p. 561—586 ). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (Eds.). (1989a). The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Precessing. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1989b). Functionalism and the Competition Model. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Precessing (p. 3—73). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Bechtel, W., Graham, G. (Eds.). (2017). A Companion to Cognitive Science. Oxford, Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Belletti, A. (Ed.). (2004). Structures and Beyond (Vol. 3: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1914). An Introduction to the Study of Language. New York, Holt.
Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York, Holt.
Google Scholar
Blumenthal-Dramé, A. (2016). What corpus-based Cognitive Linguistics can and cannot expect from neurolinguistics. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(4), 493—505.
Google Scholar
Bogusławski, A. (2011). Głos w dyskusji panelowej na temat głównych nurtów metodologicznych językoznawstwa (Zjazd Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego, Wrocław, wrzesień 2010). Bulletin De La Société Polonaise De Linguistique, LXVII, 87—91.
Google Scholar
Bouchard, D. (2002). Adjectives, Number and Interfaces. Why Languages Vary. Amsterdam — Boston — London — New York, Elsevier.
Google Scholar
Bouchard, D. (2005). Exaption and linguistic explanation. Lingua, 115(12), 1685—1696.
Google Scholar
Bouchard, D. (2013). The nature and origin of language. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Bouchard, D. (2019). La linguistique en toute simplicité/Linguistics, simply. Revue Canadienne De Linguistique/Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 64(2), 360—405.
Google Scholar
Broekhuis, H., & Vogel, R. (Eds.). (2006). Optimality Theory and Minimalism: a Possible Convergence? Linguistics in Potsdam, 25.
Google Scholar
Bromberger, S. (1966). Why-Questions. In R. G. Colodny (Ed.), Mind and Cosmos: Essays in Contemporary Science and Philosophy (p. 86—111). Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press.
Google Scholar
Bromberger, S. (1992). On What we Know We Don’t Know. Explanation, Theory, Linguistics, and How Questions Shape Them. Chicago — London, University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Cariou, J. (2019). Histoire des démarches scientifiques : De l’Antiquité au monde contemporain. Paris, Éditions Matériologiques.
Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1964). Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. In J. Fodor & J. Katz (Eds.), The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language (p. 50—118). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1966a). Cartesian Linguistics. New York, Harper & Row Publishers.
Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1966b). Explanatory Models in Linguistics. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, 44(C), 528—550.
Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on Language. New York, Pantheon.
Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1977). Essays on Form and Interpretation. New York — Amsterdam — London — North Holland, Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. New York, Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1993). Language and Thought. Wakefield RI, Moyer Bell.
Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2001). Beyond Explanatory Adequacy. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 20, 104—131. Cambridge (Massachusetts), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. (Reprinted in A. Belletti (Ed.) (2004)).
Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2004a). The Generative Enterprise Revisited. Discussions with Riny Huybregts, Henk van Riemsdijk, Naoki Fukui and Mihoko Zushi. Berlin — New York, De Gruyter Mouton.
Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2004b). Explanation in Linguistics. In N. Chomsky, The Generative Enterprise Revisited. Discussions with Riny Huybregts, Henk van Riemsdijk, Naoki Fukui and Mihoko Zushi (p. 53—62). Berlin — New York, De Gruyter Mouton.
Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2009a). Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2009b). Description and explanation in linguistics. In N. Chomsky, Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought (p. 93—97). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., & Miller, G. A. (1963). Introduction to the Formal Analysis of Natural Languages. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology (Vol. 2, p. 269—321). New York, Wiley.
Google Scholar
Church, K., & Liberman, M. (2021). The Future of Computational Linguistics: On Beyond Alchemy. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4, 1—18.
Google Scholar
Colodny, R. G. (Ed.). (1966). Mind and Cosmos: Essays in Contemporary Science and Philosophy. Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press.
Google Scholar
Croft, W. (1995). Autonomy and Functionalist Linguistics. Language, 71(3), 490—532.
Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2016). Typology and the future of Cognitive Linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(4), 587—602.
Google Scholar
Culioli, A. (1987a). Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation. Opérations et représentations (T. 1). Paris, Ophrys (repris de Sens et place des connaissances dans la société. Centre de Meudon-Bellevue, CNRS).
Google Scholar
Culioli, A. (1987b). La linguistique : de l’empirique au formel. In A. Culioli (1987), Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation. Opérations et représentations (T. 1, p. 9—46). Paris, Ophrys (repris de Sens et place des connaissances dans la société. Centre de Meudon-Bellevue, CNRS).
Google Scholar
Culioli, A., & Desclés, J.-P. (avec la collab. de R. Kabore & D.-E. Kouloughli). (1981). Systèmes de représentations linguistiques et métalinguistiques (Les catégories grammaticales et le problème de la description de langues peu étudiées). Unesdoc, Digital Library. Systèmes de représentations linguistiques et métalinguistiques : les catégories grammaticales et le problème de la description de langues peu étudiées — UNESCO Digital Library.
Google Scholar
Culioli, A., & Desclés, J-P. (1982). Traitement formel des langues naturelles, Partie I : Mise en place des concepts à partir d’exemples ; Partie II : Dérivations d’exemples, Mathématiques et sciences humaines (numéro spécial I et II). Linguistique et mathématiques, 77/78.
Google Scholar
Dale, R. (2008). What’s the future for computational linguistics? Computational Linguistics, 34(4), 621—624.
Google Scholar
Danielewiczowa, M. (2017). Argumenty i modyfikatory — głos w dyskusji [Arguments and adjuncts — contribution to the discussion]. Linguistica Copernicana, 14, 55—70.
Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, E. (2016). Cognitive Linguistics’ seven deadly sins. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(4), 479—491.
Google Scholar
Desclés, J.-P. (1990). Langages applicatifs, langues naturelles et cognition. Paris, Hermès.
Google Scholar
Desclés, J.-P. (2016). Les mathématiques de la grammaire d’opérateurs de Zellig Harris. In C. Martinot et al. (Éds.), Perspectives harrissienes (p. 83—105). Paris, Cellule de recherche en Linguistique.
Google Scholar
Desclés, J.-P. (2021). La linguistique peut-elle sortir de son état pré-galiléen ? Neophilologica, 33.
Google Scholar
Devitt, M. (2008). Explanation and reality in linguistics. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 8(23), 203—231.
Google Scholar
Divjak, D., Levshina, N., & Klavan, J. (2016). Cognitive Linguistics: Looking back, looking forward. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(4), 447—463.
Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (1997). The Rise and Fall of Languages. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Dryer, M. (2008). Descriptive theories, explanatory theories, and Basic Linguistic Theory. In F. K. Ameka, A. Dench & N. Evans (Eds.), Catching Language (p. 207—234). Berlin — New York, De Gruyter Mouton.
Google Scholar
Fillmore, Ch. J. (1972). On generativity. In P. Stanley (Ed.), Goals of linguistic theory (p. 1—19). New York, Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs.
Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1985). Some notes on what linguistics is about. In J. Katz (Ed.), The Philosophy of Linguistics (p. 146—160). New York — Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Fodor, J., & Katz, J. (Eds.). (1964). The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar
François, J. (2003). La faculté de langage : travaux récents d’inspiration fonctionaliste sur son architecture, ses universaux, son émergence et sa transmission. Corela, 1(1), 1—24. http://journals.openedition.org/corela/641
Google Scholar
François, F. (2013). Sur le dialogue et l’interprétation, un point de vue. La linguistique, 49, 135—161.
Google Scholar
François, J. (2014). L’émergence et l’évolution du langage humain du point de vue des neurosciences. Corela, 12(2), 1—24. http://journals.openedition.org/corela/3629
Google Scholar
François, J. (2018). De la généalogie des langues à la génétique du langage : une documentation interdisciplinaire raisonnée. Louvain, Peeters.
Google Scholar
Gallego, A. J., & Martin, R. (2020). Language, Syntax, and the Natural Sciences. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Gao, Y., & Webster, J. J. (2020). New directions of systemic functional linguistics. Journal of World Languages, 6(1-2), 1—4.
Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D., & Cuyckens, H. (Eds.). (2007). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford — New York, Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Givón, T. (2013). Beyond structuralism: Should we set a priori limits on our curiosity? Studies in Language, 37(2), 413—423.
Google Scholar
Givón, T. (2016). Beyond structuralism: Exorcizing Saussure’s ghost. Studies in Language, 40, 681—704.
Google Scholar
Granger, G.-G. (1994). Formes, opérations, objets. Paris, Vrin.
Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. (Ed.). (1963a). Universals of Language. Cambridge (Massachusetts), MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. (1963b). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of Language (p. 73—113). Cambridge (Massachusetts), MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Grohmann, K. K. (2005). Review of Seuren (2004). Linguist List, 16.
Google Scholar
Gross, G. (2012). Manuel d’analyse linguistique. Villeneuve-d’Ascq, Presses universitaires du Septentrion.
Google Scholar
Gross, G. (2021). Des perspectives rigoureuses pour la linguistique. Neophilologica, 33.
Google Scholar
Gross, M. (1968). L’emploi des modèles en linguistique. Langages, 9, 3—8.
Google Scholar
Gross, M. (1975). Méthodes en syntaxe. Paris, Hermann.
Google Scholar
Hacken, P. ten (2006). The Nature, Use and Origin of Explanatory Adequacy. In H. Broekhuis & R. Vogel (Eds.), Optimality Theory and Minimalism: a Possible Convergence? Linguistics in Potsdam, 25, 9—32.
Google Scholar
Hacken, P. ten (2007). Chomskyan Linguistics and its Competitors. London — Oakville, Equinox.
Google Scholar
Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of discovery: An inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Hanson, N. R. (1971a). What I Do Not Believe, and Other Essays. Dordrecht, D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Google Scholar
Hanson, N. R. (1971b). Observation and Explanation: A Guide to Philosophy of Science. In N. R. Hanson, What I Do Not Believe, and Other Essays (p. 81—121). Dordrecht, D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Google Scholar
Harris, Z. S. (1951). Methods in Structural Linguistics. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G. (1965a). Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York, Free Press.
Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G. (1965b). Aspects of Scientific Explanation. In C. G. Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science (p. 331—496). New York, Free Press.
Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G., & Oppenheim, P. (1965 [1948]). Studies in the Logic of Explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15(2), 135—175. (Reprinted in C. G. Hempel (1965a), 245—290).
Google Scholar
Hockett, Ch. F. (1968). The State of the Art. The Hague — Paris, Mouton.
Google Scholar
Hoffmann, S., Rayson, P., & Leech, G. (2015). English Corpus Linguistics: Looking back, Moving forward. In English Corpus Linguistics: Looking back, Moving forward (p. 1—5). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401207478
Google Scholar
Holmberg, A. (2000). Am I Unscientific? A Reply To Lappin, Levine, and Johnson. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 18, 837—842.
Google Scholar
Hornstein, N., & Lightfoot, D. (1985). Explanation in Linguistics. The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie, 47(2), 338—338. https://philpapers.org/rec/HOREIL
Google Scholar
Itkonen, E. (1978). Grammatical Theory And Metascience. A Critical Investigation Into The Methodological And Philosophical Foundations Of ‘Autonomous’ Linguistics. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Google Scholar
Itkonen, E. (1983). Causality in Linguistic Theory. London, Croom Helm.
Google Scholar
Itkonen, E. (2013–14). On Explanation in Linguistics. Energeia, 5, 10—40.
Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1989). What is a concept, that a person can grasp it? Mind and Language, 4, 68—102.
Google Scholar
Johnson, D. E., & Lappin, S. (1997). A Critique of the Minimalist Program. Linguistics and Philosophy, 20, 273—333.
Google Scholar
Katz, J. (Ed.). (1985). The Philosophy of Linguistics. New York — Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Kertész, A. (2010). From ‘scientific revolution’ to ‘unscientific revolution’: an analysis of approaches to the history of generative linguistics. Language Sciences, 32, 507—527.
Google Scholar
Kertész, A., & Rákosi, C. (Eds.). (2008). New Approaches to Linguistic Evidence. Pilot Studies. Lang, Frankfurt am Main.
Google Scholar
Kiss, A. A. (Ed.). (2015). Syntax − Theory and Analysis An International Handbook (Vol. 1). Berlin — Munich — Boston, Walter de Gruyter GmbH.
Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K. (2004). Linguistics and Revolution. With Particular Reference to the ‘Chomskyan Revolution’. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics, 106, 3—62.
Google Scholar
Kuhn, Th. (1970). La structure des révolutions scientifiques. Paris, Flammarion.
Google Scholar
Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research Programmes. Philosophical Papers (Vol. I). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1989). The Way We Were; or; The Real Truth About Generative Semantics: A Memoir. Journal of Pragmatics, 13(6), 939—988.
Google Scholar
Langacker, R. (2016). Working toward a synthesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(4), 465—477.
Google Scholar
Langendoen, D. T. (1998). Linguistic Theory. In W. Bechte & G. Graham (Eds.), A Companion to Cognitive Science (p. 235—245). Oxford, Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Lappin, S., Levine, R. D., & Johnson, D. E. (2000a). The Structure of Unscientific Revolutions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 18, 665—671.
Google Scholar
Lappin, S., Levine, R. D., & Johnson, D. E. (2000b). The Revolution Confused: A Response to Our Critics. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 18, 873—890.
Google Scholar
Lappin, S., Levine, R. D., & Johnson, D. E. (2001). The Revolution Maximally Confused. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 19, 901—919.
Google Scholar
Largeault, J. (2021). Description et explication. Encyclopædia Universalis. https://www.universalis.fr/encyclopedie/description-et-explication/
Google Scholar
Laudan, L. (1978). Progress and Its Problems. Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley — Los Angeles, University of California Press.
Google Scholar
Lazard, G. (1999). La linguistique est-elle une science ? Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, 94(1), 67—112.
Google Scholar
Lazard, G. (2006). La quête des invariants. La linguistique est-elle une science ? Paris, Honoré Champion.
Google Scholar
Lazard, G. (2012). The case for pure linguistics. Studies in Language, 36, 241—259.
Google Scholar
Lazard, G. (2013a). Réflexions séculaires. La linguistique, 49, 49—65.
Google Scholar
Lazard, G. (2013b). La linguistique aujourd’hui : Observations mutuelles. La linguistique, 49, 163—168.
Google Scholar
Lazard, G. (2015). Thèses pour la linguistique pure. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris. https://poj.peeters-leuven.be/content.php?id=3132115&url=article.php
Google Scholar
Lerner, A. J., Simon, C., & Sarah-Jane, L. (Eds). (2020). Current Controversies in the Philosophy of Cognitive Science. New York — London, Routledge.
Google Scholar
Luce, R. D., Bush, R. R., & Galanter, E. (Eds.). (1963). Handbook of Mathematical Psychology. New York, Wiley.
Google Scholar
Mahmoudian, M. (2013a). Linguistique et sciences du langage. La linguistique, 49, 67—96.
Google Scholar
Mahmoudian, M. (2013b). Questions et suggestions : en réaction aux contributions au thème « la linguistique aujourd’hui ». La linguistique, 49, 169—189.
Google Scholar
Marmaridou, S., et al. (Eds.). (2005a). Reviewing Linguistic Thought: Converging Trends for the 21st Century. Berlin — New York, De Gruyter Mouton.
Google Scholar
Marmaridou, S., et al. (2005b). Reviewing linguistic thought: Converging trends for the 21st century. In S. Marmaridou et al. (Eds.), Reviewing Linguistic Thought: Converging Trends for the 21st Century (p. 1—13). Berlin — New York, De Gruyter Mouton.
Google Scholar
Martin, Ph. (1975). Analyse phonologique de la phrase française. Linguistics, 146, 35—68.
Google Scholar
Martin, Ph. (2013). La linguistique aujourd’hui : Commentaires. La linguistique, 49, 191—194.
Google Scholar
Martinot, C., et al. (Eds.). (2016). Perspectives harrisiennes. Paris. Cellule de recherche en Linguistique.
Google Scholar
Milner, J.-C. (1989). Introduction à une science du langage. Paris, Seuil.
Google Scholar
Müller, S. (2016). Grammatical theory: From transformational grammar to constraint-based approaches. Berlin, Language Science Press.
Google Scholar
Neveu, F., Fasciolo, M., & Gross, G. (Eds.). (à par.). Décrire une langue : objectifs et méthodes. Paris, Garnier.
Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J. (1986). Has there been a ‘Chomskyan Revolution’ in Linguistics? Language, 62, 1—19.
Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J. (1991). Functional explanation in linguistics and the origins of language. Language & Communication, 11(1-2), 3—28.
Google Scholar
Niiniluoto, I. (2019). Scientific Progress. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/scientific-progress/
Google Scholar
Odijk, J. (2019). Past and future of linguistics in the Netherlands. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 36, 43—48.
Google Scholar
Palmarini, M. (1998). Foreword. In J. Uriagereka, Rhyme and Reason. An Introduction to Minimalist Syntax (p. 21—36). Cambridge (Massachusetts) — London (England), MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Panaccio, C. (1979). L’explication en grammaire transformationnelle. Dialogue, 18(3), 307—341.
Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1950). Introduction à l’épistémologie génétique (T. II : La Pensée physique). Paris, Presses universitaires de France.
Google Scholar
Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (2000). The Metric of Open-Mindedness. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 18(4), 859—862.
Google Scholar
Pietroski, P., & Hornstein, N. (2020). Universal Grammar. In A. J. Lerner, C. Simon & L. Sarah-Jane (Eds.), Current Controversies in the Philosophy of Cognitive Science (p. 11—28). New York — London, Routledge.
Google Scholar
Ping, C. (1987). Description vs. explanation: a binary view of Western goals in linguistics. Foreign Language Teaching and Research. https://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-WJYY198701000.htm
Google Scholar
Pottier, B. (2012). Images et modèles en linguistique. Paris, Honoré Champion.
Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1992). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London — New York, Routledge.
Google Scholar
Przepiórkowski, A. (2017a). On the argument–adjunct distinction in the Polish Semantic Syntax tradition. Cognitive Studies/Études Cognitives, 17, 1—10.
Google Scholar
Przepiórkowski, A. (2017b). Argumenty i modyfikatory w gramatyce i w słowniku [Arguments and adjuncts in the grammar and in the lexicon]. Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Google Scholar
Pullum, G. K. (2020). Waiting for Universal Grammar. In A. J. Lerner, C. Simon & L. Sarah-Jane (Eds.), Current Controversies in the Philosophy of Cognitive Science (p. 29—44). New York — London, Routledge.
Google Scholar
Reuland, E. (2000). Revolution, Discovery, And An Elementary Principle Of Logic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 18, 843—848.
Google Scholar
Rey, G. (2020). Representation of Language. Philosophical Issues in a Chomskyan Linguistics. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (2016). The Concept of Explanatory Adequacy. In I. Roberts (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Universal Grammar. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Roberts, I. (2001). Who Has Confused What? More On Lappin, Levine And Johnson. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 19, 887—890.
Google Scholar
Roberts, I. (Ed.). (2016). The Oxford Handbook of Universal Grammar. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Salmon, W. C. (1984). Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
Salmon, W. C. (1997). Causality and Explanation: A Reply to Two Critiques. Philosophy of Science, 64(3), 461—477.
Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1921). Language. An Introduction To The Study Of Speech. New York, Harcourt, Brace and Company.
Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de (1967). Cours de Linguistique générale. Paris, Éditions Payot & Rivages.
Google Scholar
Scholz, B. C., Pelletier, F. J., & Pullum, G. K. (2020). Philosophy of Linguistics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. E. N. Zalta (Ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/linguistics/
Google Scholar
Sériot, P. (2013a). La langue pense-t-elle pour nous ? La linguistique, 49, 115—131.
Google Scholar
Sériot, P. (2013b). La linguistique aujourd’hui : Réactions. La linguistique, 49, 195—204.
Google Scholar
Seuren, P. A. M. (2004). Chomsky’s Minimalism. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Shuy, R. W. (2015). Applied Linguistics Past and Future. Applied Linguistics, 36(4), 434—443.
Google Scholar
Stanley, P. (Ed.). (1972). Goals of linguistic theory. New York, Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs.
Google Scholar
Suppe, F. (Ed.). (1977). The Structure of Scientific Theories (2nd ed.). Urbana, University of Illinois Press.
Google Scholar
Śmigielska, B. (2021). Modèles sémantico-syntaxiques des prédicats dans la conception de la grammaire à base sémantique de Stanisław Karolak — quelques problèmes et solutions. Neophilologica, 33.
Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R. (2007). Cognitive Linguistics and Autonomous Linguistics. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (p. 566—588). Oxford — New York, Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Thompson, G., et al. (Eds.). (2019). The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Thompson, S. A. (1991). On addressing functional explanation in linguistics. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1991-23780-001
Google Scholar
Uriagereka, J. (1998). Rhyme and Reason. An Introduction to Minimalist Syntax. Cambridge (Massachusetts) — London (England), MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Verhagen, A. (2008). Intersubjectivity and explanation in linguistics: A reply to Hinzen and van Lambalgen. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(1), 125—143.
Google Scholar
Winston, M. E. (1978). Explanation in Linguistics: A Critique of Generative Grammar. https://search.proquest.com/openview/25eafa34a1b120a08acf00b90f5deb01/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Google Scholar
Woodward, J., & Ross, L. (2021). Scientific Explanation. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy E. N. Zalta (Ed.) https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/scientific-explanation/
Google Scholar
Vol. 33 (2021)
Publié: 2022-01-05
10.31261/NEO
Français (France)
English