Al Ajmi, A. A. S. (2015). The effect of written corrective feedback on Omani students’ accuracy in the use of English prepositions. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.1p.61
Google Scholar

Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 227–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00027-8
Google Scholar

Berg, B. L. (2004). Qualitative research methods (5th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Google Scholar

Berthold, M. (2011). Reliability of Quick Placement Tests: How much faith can we place on quick paper or internet-based placement tests. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(6), 674–698.
Google Scholar

Beşkardeşler, S., & Kocaman, O. (2019). The effects of written corrective feedback types on the prepositions of place and time in EFL context. Journal of Multidisciplinary studies in Education, 3(1), 1–13.
Google Scholar

Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw..2007.11.004
Google Scholar

Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. Routledge.
Google Scholar

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 409–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089924
Google Scholar

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009a). The relative effectiveness of different types of direct written corrective feedback. System, 37(2), 322–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.12.006
Google Scholar

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009b). The value of focused approach to written corrective feedback. ELT Journal, 63, 204–211. http://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn043
Google Scholar

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31, 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp016
Google Scholar

Bitchener, J., & Storch, N. (2016). Written corrective feedback for L2 development. Multilingual Matters.
Google Scholar

Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001
Google Scholar

Braine, G. (2001). A study of English as a foreign language (EFL) writers on a local-area network (LAN) and in traditional classes. Computers and Composition, 18(3), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/s8755-4615(01)00056-1
Google Scholar

Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. Longman.
Google Scholar

Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1060-3743(03)00038-9
Google Scholar

Corlet, D., Sharples, D., Bull, S., & Chan, T. (2005). Evaluation of a mobile learning organiser for university students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00124.x
Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (1991). Grammaticality judgments and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 161–186.
Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023
Google Scholar

Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima. H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36, 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.001
Google Scholar

Farrokhi, F., & Sattarpour, S. (2012). The effects of written corrective feedback on improvement of grammatical accuracy of high-proficient L2 learners. World Journal of Education, 2. https:/doi.org/10.5430/wje.v2n2p49
Google Scholar

Ferris, D. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short-and long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and Issues (pp. 31–104). Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Ferris, D. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA: Intersections and practical applications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990490
Google Scholar

Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80110-6
Google Scholar

Frear, D. (2012). The effect of written corrective feedback and revision on intermediate Chinese learners’ acquisition of English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Google Scholar

Frear, D., & Chiu, Y. H. (2015). The effect of focused and unfocused indirect written corrective feedback on EFL learners’ accuracy in new pieces of writing. System, 53, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.06.006
Google Scholar

Gass. S. M., & Lewis, K. (2007). Perceptions of interactional feedback: Differences between heritage language learners and non-heritage language learners. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 79–99). Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Garcıa Laborda, J., Magal Royo, T., Litzler, M. F., & Gimenez Lopez, J. L. (2014). Mobile phones for Spain’s university entrance examination language test. Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 17–30.
Google Scholar

Ghorbani, N., & Ebadi, S. (2020). Exploring learners’ grammatical development in mobile assisted language learning, Cogent Education, 7(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1704599
Google Scholar

Han, Z. (2002). A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 543–572. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588240
Google Scholar

Hill, N. E., & Taylor, L. C. (2004). Parental school involvement and children’s academic achievement pragmatics and issues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(4), 161–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00298.x
Google Scholar

Hsu, L. (2013). English as a foreign language learners’ perception of mobile assisted language learning: A cross-national study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(3), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.649485
Google Scholar

Hsu, L. (2016). Examining EFL teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and the adoption of mobile-assisted language learning: A partial least square approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(8), 1287–1297. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1278024
Google Scholar

Ishida, M. (2004). Effects of recasts on the acquisition of the aspectual form of –te i (ru) by learners of Japanese as a foreign language. Language Learning, 54, 311–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00257.x
Google Scholar

Iwashita, N. (2003). Negative feedback and positive evidence in task-based interaction: Differential effects of L2 development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263103000019
Google Scholar

Jusa, G., & Kuang, C. H. (2016). The effect of direct corrective feedback on the correct usage of the preposition of time. Journal of Advanced Research in Social and Behavioural Sciences, 3(1), 109–122.
Google Scholar

Karim, K., & Endely, M. J. (2019). Should feedback be direct or indirect? Comparing the effectiveness of different types of WCF on L1 Arabic writers’ use of English prepositions. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 13, 68–84.
Google Scholar

Keshavarz, M. H. (2015). Contrastive analysis, error analysis, and interlanguage. Rahnama.
Google Scholar

Ko, M. H. (2019). Students’ reactions to using smartphones and social media for vocabulary feedback. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(8), 920–944. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1541360
Google Scholar

Kohnke, L. (2020). Exploring learner perception, experience and motivation of using a mobile app in L2 vocabulary acquisition. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcallt.2020010102
Google Scholar

Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309–365.
Google Scholar

Lindbom-Ylanne, S., & Pihlajamaki, H. (2003). Can a collaborative network environment enhance essay writing process? British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 17–30.
Google Scholar

Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and L2 development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 37–63.
Google Scholar

Liu, Y. (2008). The effects of error feedback in second language writing. Arizona Working Papers in SLA and Teaching, 15, 65–79.
Google Scholar

Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x
Google Scholar

Loewen, S. (2004). Uptake in incidental focus on form in meaning-focused ESL lessons. Language Learning, 54(1), 153–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00251.x
Google Scholar

Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444812000365
Google Scholar

Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 407–452). Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2006). Responses to recasts: Repetitions, primed production, and linguistic development. Language Learning, 56, 693–720. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00393.x
Google Scholar

McQuiggan, S., Kosturko, L., Sabourin, J., & McQuiggan, J. (2015). Mobile learning: A handbook for developers, educators, and learners. John Wiley Sons, Inc.
Google Scholar

Miller, P. C. (2003). The effectiveness of corrective feedback: A meta-analysis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA.
Google Scholar

Motallebzadeh, K., & Nematizadeh, S. (2011). Does gender play a role in the assessment of oral proficiency?. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n4p165
Google Scholar

Nassaji. (2018). Errors versus mistakes. In H. Nassaji (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching, Grammar Teaching Volume. Wiley-Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Nassaji. (2018). Errors versus mistakes. In H. Nassaji (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching, Grammar Teaching Volume. Wiley-Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Nassaji, H., & Swain, M. (2000). A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness, 9(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410008667135
Google Scholar

Nassaji, H. (2015). The interactional dimension in instructed second language learning. Bloomsbury.
Google Scholar

Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science, 37(4), 375–401.
Google Scholar

O’Bannon, B. W., & Thomas, K. (2014). Teacher perceptions of using mobile phones in the classroom: Age matters!. Computers & Computers Education, 74, 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.006
Google Scholar

Qian, K., Owen, N., & Bax, S. (2018). Researching mobile-assisted Chinese-character learning strategies among adult distance learners. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2018.1418633
Google Scholar

Rassaei, E. (2019). Computer-mediated text-based and audio-based corrective feedback, perceptual style and L2 development. System, 82, 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.03.004
Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. W. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Sheen, Y. (2007). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 301–322). Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Sheen, Y. (2008). Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning. Language Learning, 58(4), 835–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00480.x
Google Scholar

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189.
Google Scholar

Stefanou, C., & Revesz, A. (2015). Direct written corrective feedback, learners differences, and the acquisition of second language article use for generic and specific plural reference. The Modern Language Journal, 99, 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12212
Google Scholar

Stockwell, G. (2013). Technology and motivation in English language teaching and learning. In E. Ushioda (Ed.), International perspectives on motivation (pp. 156–175). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137000873
Google Scholar

Storch, N. (2010). Critical feedback on written corrective feedback research. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119181
Google Scholar

Swain, M., & Suzuki, W. (2008). Interaction, output, and communicative language learning. In B. Spolsky & F. M. Hult (Eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics (pp. 557–568). Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Tarighat, S., & Khodabakhsh, S. (2016). Mobile-assisted language assessment: Assessing speaking. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 409–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.014
Google Scholar

Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x
Google Scholar

Truscott, J., & Hsu, A. Y. P (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.05.003
Google Scholar

Van Beuningen, C. G., De Jong, N. H., & Kuiken, F. (2012). Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language Learning, 62(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00674.x
Google Scholar

Vigil, N., & Oller, J. (1976). Rule fossilization: A tentative model. Language Learning, 26, 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1976.tb00278.x
Google Scholar

Wistner, B., Sakai, H., & Abe, M. (2009). An analysis of the Oxford Placement Test and the Michigan English Placement Test as L2 proficiency tests. Bulletin of the Faculty of Letters,58(2), 33–44.
Google Scholar

Xodabande, I. (2017). The effectiveness of social media network telegram in teaching English language pronunciation to Iranian EFL learners. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2017.1347081
Google Scholar

Xu, Q., & Peng, H. (2017). Investigating mobile-assisted oral feedback in teaching Chinese as a second language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3–4), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1297836
Google Scholar

Yousefi, M. & Nassaji, H. (2019). A meta-analysis of the effects of instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pragmatics and the role of moderator variables. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 170(2), 278–309. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.19012.you
Google Scholar

Zhao, Y., & Ellis, R. (2020). The relative effects of implicit and explicit corrective feedback on the acquisition of 3rd person -s by Chinese university students: A classroom-based study. Language Teaching Research, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820903343
Google Scholar