Low-Cognitive-Load Games as Attentional Support: A Scoping Review for Gen Z Learners

Juraj Kovalčík; Magdaléna Švecová; Michal Kabát; Martin Paučin

doi:10.31261/IJREL.2025.11.2.04

Опубліковано: 2025-12-31

2025

Low-Cognitive-Load Games as Attentional Support: A Scoping Review for Gen Z Learners

Juraj Kovalčík

, Magdaléna Švecová

, Michal Kabát

, Martin Paučin

Розділ: Articles

https://doi.org/10.31261/IJREL.2025.11.2.04

Анотація

In an era of constant digital multitasking, Generation Z learners struggle to maintain attention and memory during study and lecture-based learning. Although heavy social media use and technology-driven distractions are linked to poorer academic outcomes, emerging evidence suggests that low-cognitive-load digital activities – such as casual games, electronic fidgets, and brief micro-breaks – may help sustain engagement. This scoping review maps research published between 2010 and 2025 on digital micro-breaks, fidgeting tools, and other low-demand activities in learning and work contexts. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, 33 studies across 31 articles were identified through database searching and citation chaining. Evidence shows that short, low-effort, volitional activities can restore attentional resources, reduce fatigue, and improve affect without harming concurrent task performance, especially when compared with more demanding or externally imposed digital interruptions. Micro-break and recovery studies highlight the benefits of brief restorative activities, while research on digital fidgets points to the self-regulatory value of rhythmic, repetitive interactions. Broader work on parallel digital activity emphasises that timing, context, and volition critically shape outcomes. Overall, findings suggest that purposefully designed low-cognitive-load games or tools may act as attentional supports, helping learners resist more disruptive cyberloafing. However, the literature remains fragmented, with inconsistent results for memory and limited research directly focused on educational settings. Future work should trial experimental prototypes of “mindless” mobile games for Gen Z learners, examining task type, timing, and individual differences to determine whether such interventions can enhance learning while mitigating distraction.

Завантажити файли

PDF (English)

Правила цитування

Kovalčík, J., Švecová, M., Kabát, M., & Paučin, M. (2025). Low-Cognitive-Load Games as Attentional Support: A Scoping Review for Gen Z Learners. International Journal of Research in E-Learning, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.31261/IJREL.2025.11.2.04

Цитовано в / Поділитися

Ліцензія

TЦя робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.

1. License

The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.

2. Author’s Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.

If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".

ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).

3. User Rights

Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.

4. Co-Authorship

If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.

I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.

Посилання

Adams, A. T., Costa, J., Jung, M. F., & Choudhury, T. (2015). Mindless computing: Designing technologies to subtly influence behavior. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, 719–730. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2805843
Google Scholar

Albulescu, P., Macsinga, I., Rusu, A., Sulea, C., Bodnaru, A., & Tulbure, B. T. (2022). ‘Give me a break!’ A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of micro-breaks for increasing well-being and performance. PLOS ONE, 17(8), e0272460. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272460
Google Scholar

Alharthi, S. A., Alsaedi, O., Toups Dugas, P. O., Tanenbaum, T. J., & Hammer, J. (2018). Playing to Wait: A Taxonomy of Idle Games. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174195
Google Scholar

Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570 32000119616
Google Scholar

Barton, A. C., Sheen, J., & Byrne, L. K. (2020). Immediate Attention Enhancement and Restoration From Interactive and Immersive Technologies: A Scoping Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2050. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02050
Google Scholar

Brosnan, B., Meredith-Jones, K. A., Haszard, J. J., Wickham, S.-R., Galland, B. C., Russell-Camp, T., & Taylor, R. W. (2025). From dusk to dawn: Examining how adolescents engage with digital media using objective measures of screen time in a repeated measures study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 22(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-024-01698-0
Google Scholar

Burney, V., & Sharp, R. A. (2025). Effectiveness and Acceptability of Micro‐Breaks to Increase Engagement in Postgraduate Lectures. Behavioral Interventions, 40(4), e70029. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.70029
Google Scholar

Da Câmara, S. B. (2022). Developing and Utilizing a Smart, Instrumented Fidget To Better Understand Fidgeting and its Relationship with Cognitively Demanding Activities [Doctoral dissertation]. University of California.
Google Scholar

Da Câmara, S. B., Agrawal, R., & Isbister, K. (2018). Identifying Children’s Fidget Object Preferences: Toward Exploring the Impacts of Fidgeting and Fidget-Friendly Tangibles. Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196790
Google Scholar

De Franches, G. R., & Gulbay, E. (2025). Improving student wellbeing and learning through serious games and active breaks. EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY, 1, 299–309. https://doi.org/10.3280/ess1-2025oa19741
Google Scholar

Dianita, O., Kitayama, K., Ueda, K., Ishii, H., Shimoda, H., & Obayashi, F. (2024). Systematic micro-breaks affect concentration during cognitive comparison tasks: Quantitative and qualitative measurements. Advances in Computational Intelligence, 4(3), 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43674-024-00074-6
Google Scholar

Dianita, O., Nomura, K., Higashimaki, T., Abe, R., Ueda, K., Ishii, H., Shimoda, H., & Obayashi, F. (2025). Systematic visual stimuli micro-refresh Evaluation on cognitive work performance. Displays, 90, 103116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2025.103116
Google Scholar

Eichenlaub, J. A. (2022). Constructing Fidgeting: Integrating Extended Cognition, Mind Wandering, and Mindless Interaction in Pursuit of a Productive Mood State [Master’s thesis]. Delft University of Technology.
Google Scholar

Eichenlaub, J. A., Huisman, G., & Xue, H. (2023). Exploring Extended Mind-Wandering Through an Interactive Haptic Fidget Object. Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 2657–2671. https://doi.org/10.1145/3563657.3596084
Google Scholar

Ellis, Y., Daniels, B., & Andres, J. (2010). The effect of multitasking on the grade performance of business students. Research in Higher Education Journal, 8(1), 1–10.
Google Scholar

Gellmers, J., & Yan, N. (2023). Digital Leisure Engagement and Positive Outcomes in the Workplace: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2), 1014. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021014
Google Scholar

Graben, K., Doering, B. K., & Barke, A. (2022a). Playing smartphone games while studying: An experimental study on reading interruptions by a smartphone game. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3965–3980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10764-0
Google Scholar

Graben, K., Doering, B. K., & Barke, A. (2022b). Receiving push-notifications from smartphone games reduces students learning performance in a brief lecture: An experimental study. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 5, 100170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100170
Google Scholar

Grobelny, J., Glinka, M., & Chirkowska-Smolak, T. (2024). The impact of hedonic social media use during microbreaks on employee resources recovery. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 21603. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-72825-x
Google Scholar

Ji, C., & Isbister, K. (2022). AR Fidget: Augmented Reality Experiences that Support Emotion Regulation through Fidgeting. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519874
Google Scholar

Jiang, H., Siponen, M., & Tsohou, A. (2023). Personal use of technology at work: A literature review and a theoretical model for understanding how it affects employee job performance. European Journal of Information Systems, 32(2), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1963193
Google Scholar

Karlesky, M., & Isbister, K. (2014). Designing for the physical margins of digital workspaces: Fidget widgets in support of productivity and creativity. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2540930.2540978
Google Scholar

Karlesky, M., & Isbister, K. (2016). Understanding Fidget Widgets: Exploring the Design Space of Embodied Self-Regulation. Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2971557
Google Scholar

Kitayama, K., Dianita, O., Ueda, K., Ishii, H., Shimoda, H., & Obayashi, F. (2023). Micro-refresh to Restore Intellectual Concentration Decline during Office Work: An Attempt at Quantitative Effect Evaluation. Intelligent Human Systems Integration (IHSI 2023) Integrating People and Intelligent Systems. https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002824
Google Scholar

Kriescher, S. L., Hulac, D. M., Ryan, A. M., & King, B. L. (2023). Evaluating the Evidence for Fidget Toys in the Classroom. Intervention in School and Clinic, 59(1), 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512221130070
Google Scholar

Kuschpel, M. S., Liu, S., Schad, D. J., Heinzel, S., Heinz, A., & Rapp, M. A. (2015). Differential effects of wakeful rest, music and video game playing on working memory performance in the n-back task. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01683
Google Scholar

Liu, S., Kaufmann, C., Labadie, C., Ströhle, A., Kuschpel, M. S., Garbusow, M., Hummel, R., Schad, D. J., Rapp, M. A., Heinz, A., & Heinzel, S. (2019). Short-term effects of video gaming on brain response during working memory performance. PLOS ONE, 14(10), e0223666. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223666
Google Scholar

Liu, S., Kuschpel, M. S., Schad, D. J., Heinz, A., & Rapp, M. A. (2015). Differential Effects of Music and Video Gaming During Breaks on Auditory and Visual Learning. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(11), 647–653. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0140
Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Gao, Q., & Ma, L. (2021). Taking Micro-breaks at Work: Effects of Watching Funny Short-Form Videos on Subjective Experience, Physiological Stress, and Task Performance. In P.-L. P. Rau (Ed.), Cross-Cultural Design. Applications in Arts, Learning, Well-being, and Social Development (Vol. 12772, pp. 183–200). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77077-8_15
Google Scholar

Lyubykh, Z., Gulseren, D., Premji, Z., Wingate, T. G., Deng, C., Bélanger, L. J., & Turner, N. (2022). Role of work breaks in well-being and performance: A systematic review and future research agenda. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 27(5), 470–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000337
Google Scholar

Nalliah, R. P., & Allareddy, V. (2014). Students distracted by electronic devices perform at the same level as those who are focused on the lecture. PeerJ, 2, e572. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.572
Google Scholar

Perrigino, M. B., Raveendhran, R., & Ryu, J. W. (2024). Technology Use for Nonwork Purposes at Work: A Behavior-Focused Integrative Review. Academy of Management Annals, 18(2), 403–434. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2022.0191
Google Scholar

Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
Google Scholar

Rosen, L. D., Mark Carrier, L., & Cheever, N. A. (2013). Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 948–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.001
Google Scholar

Ross, S. H., Sullivan, N., & Yoon, J. A. (2023). Virtual Fidgets: Opportunities and Design Principles for Bringing Fidgeting to Online Learning. Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3585729
Google Scholar

Rykard, K. S. (2020). Digital distractions: Using action research to explore students’ behaviors, motivations, and perceptions of cyberslacking in a suburban high school [Doctoral dissertation]. University of South Carolina.
Google Scholar

Sampasa-Kanyinga, H., Chaput, J.-P., & Hamilton, H. A. (2019). Social Media Use, School Connectedness, and Academic Performance Among Adolescents. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 40(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-019-00543-6
Google Scholar

Schoenen, E. C., Alsip, B. S., Martinez, J. C., Grekov, P., Aspiranti, K. B., & Hulac, D. M. (2025). A Meta-Analysis of Fidget Devices as Academic and Behavioral Interventions. School Psychology Review, 54(3), 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2024.2411576
Google Scholar

Schoenen, E. C., Martinez, J. C., Grekov, P., Aspiranti, K. B., & Hulac, D. (2024). Fidget Devices as Academic and Behavioral Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Single-case Design Studies. Education and Treatment of Children, 47(3), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-024-00133-0
Google Scholar

Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2016). Generation Z goes to college. Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar

Shorey, S., Chan, V., Rajendran, P., & Ang, E. (2021). Learning styles, preferences and needs of generation Z healthcare students: Scoping review. Nurse Education in Practice, 57, 103247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103247
Google Scholar

Skulmowski, A., & Xu, K. M. (2022). Understanding Cognitive Load in Digital and Online Learning: A New Perspective on Extraneous Cognitive Load. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09624-7
Google Scholar

Sonnentag, S., Cheng, B. H., & Parker, S. L. (2022). Recovery from Work: Advancing the Field Toward the Future. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 9(1), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-091355
Google Scholar

Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102219 3728205
Google Scholar

Szymkowiak, A., Melović, B., Dabić, M., Jeganathan, K., & Kundi, G. S. (2021). Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people. Technology in Society, 65, 101565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101565
Google Scholar

Tancredi, S., & Abrahamson, D. (2024). Stimming as Thinking: A Critical Reevaluation of Self-Stimulatory Behavior as an Epistemic Resource for Inclusive Education. Educational Psychology Review, 36(3), 75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09904-y
Google Scholar

Taylor, S., Ferguson, C., Peng, F., Schoeneich, M., & Picard, R. W. (2019). Use of In-Game Rewards to Motivate Daily Self-Report Compliance: Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(1), e11683. https://doi.org/10.2196/11683
Google Scholar

Torin, T. (2021). Exploring qualities in smart fidget devices for affective regulation support. [Degree project]. KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
Google Scholar

Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
Google Scholar

Uncapher, M. R., Lin, L., Rosen, L. D., Kirkorian, H. L., Baron, N. S., Bailey, K., Cantor, J., Strayer, D. L., Parsons, T. D., & Wagner, A. D. (2017). Media Multitasking and Cognitive, Psychological, Neural, and Learning Differences. Pediatrics, 140(Supplement_2), S62–S66. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1758D
Google Scholar

Van Der Schuur, W. A., Baumgartner, S. E., Sumter, S. R., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2015). The consequences of media multitasking for youth: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.035
Google Scholar

Vedechkina, M., & Borgonovi, F. (2021). A Review of Evidence on the Role of Digital Technology in Shaping Attention and Cognitive Control in Children. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 611155. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.611155
Google Scholar

Williams, A., Posadas, B., Prioleau, D., Laurenceau, I., & Gilbert, J. E. (2019). User Perceptions of Haptic Fidgets on Mobile Devices for Attention and Task Performance. In G. Di Bucchianico (Ed.), Advances in Design for Inclusion (Vol. 776, pp. 15–22). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94622-1_2
Google Scholar

Wood, E., Zivcakova, L., Gentile, P., Archer, K., De Pasquale, D., & Nosko, A. (2012). Examining the impact of off-task multi-tasking with technology on real-time classroom learning. Computers & Education, 58(1), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.029
Google Scholar

Wu, X., Chen, Q., & Li, Y. (2025). Cyberloafing has a recovery effect: Reducing ego depletion at a cost. Current Psychology, 44(10), 8374–8391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-07762-7
Google Scholar

Zhang, Z., & Qin, L. (2021). InterRings: Towards Understanding Design Micro-games to Fit Daily Work Routine. Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451733
Google Scholar

2025
Опубліковано: 2020-07-09

ISSN: 2451-2583

eISSN: 2543-6155

Видавець

Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego | University of Silesia Press

Ліцензія CC

TЦя робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Надіслати текст

Low-Cognitive-Load Games as Attentional Support: A Scoping Review for Gen Z Learners

Анотація

Juraj Kovalčík

Magdaléna Švecová

Michal Kabát

Martin Paučin

Інформація