Stan obecny i perspektywy przyjęcia przez Serbię nowego prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego

Ewelina Kochowska

doi:10.31261/PPPM.2023.32.04

Opublikowane: 2023-05-29

Tom 32 (2023)

Stan obecny i perspektywy przyjęcia przez Serbię nowego prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego

Ewelina Kochowska

Dział: Studia

https://doi.org/10.31261/PPPM.2023.32.04

Abstrakt

The Yugoslav Act of 1982 on resolving conflict of laws with regulations of other countries is still in force in the Republic of Serbia. The law drafted over 40 years ago was considered as innovative at the time of its adoption. At present, the Serbian academic community signals the need to update the current provisions of private international law, both in the spirit of approximation with the law of the European Union and in the need to better embed this law in the present legal order of the Republic of Serbia. The draft of a new act on private international law, prepared in 2014, was not adopted yet, although it was not formally rejected as such in Serbian legislative procedures (as of April 13, 2023) either. Though not formally binding, the draft law has been cited in recent years in the Serbian law journals, being an important point of reference for considerations on questions related to private international law in Serbia. It must be admitted that the progressive Serbian academic community turned out to be an active inspirer, creator and is now also a tireless advocate of changes in the field of private international law in Serbia.
Serbia, which has been an EU candidate since 2013, has no particular obligation to introduce specific solutions in the field of private international law into its national law neither before nor after accession. EU law in the field of private international law is contained in regulations that will be automatically and directly applicable in Serbia when it becomes a member of the European Union. This is a dilemma whether to adopt the provisions which, in principle, will have to be repealed after the accession. At the same time, there are several benefits of approximating the law before the accession, including accustoming legal practitioners in Serbia to apply solutions similar to those in the EU, and increasing legal certainty by applying similar solutions of private international law in transactions between entities from Serbia and the European Union (regardless of the accession prospects).
The author describes and summarizes the current state of regulations in Serbian private international law and analyses the main changes proposed in the draft law of 2014. The article also presents agreements binding Serbia in the field of private international law, including the still binding 1960 Polish-Serbian agreement.

Słowa kluczowe:

Serbia , former Yugoslavia , private international law , change of law , succession of international agreements

Pobierz pliki

PDF

Zasady cytowania

Kochowska, E. (2023). Stan obecny i perspektywy przyjęcia przez Serbię nowego prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego. Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego, 32, 95–122. https://doi.org/10.31261/PPPM.2023.32.04

Cited by / Share

Bibliografia

Alihodžić J., Meškić Z., Duraković A., Accepting EU private international law standards into the legal system of Bosnia and Herzegovina: what can be done while waiting for Godot?, „Lexonomica” 2019, Vol. 11, No. 2.
Google Scholar

Čolović V., Klauzula odstupanja u međunarodnom privatnom pravu, „Stranipravni zivot” 2019, No 63 (3).
Google Scholar

Čolović V.Ž., Kvalifikacija kolizione norme, „Strani pravni život” 2018, No 3.
Google Scholar

Čolović V.Ž., Norme neposredne primene i javni poredak, „Strani pravni život” 2022, No 3.
Google Scholar

Đorđević S., Merodavno pravo za ugovor o distribuciji u međunarodnom privatnom pravu Srbije, Zbornik radova „Usluge i prava korisnika”, Kragujevac, 2020.
Google Scholar

Đorđević S., Određivanje merodavnog prava za ugovorno zastupanje, Zbornik radova „Usluge i vladavina prava”, Kragujevac, 2021.
Google Scholar

Đorđević S., Postupanje javnog beležnika prilikom zaključenja sporazuma o zakonskom izdržavanju sa elementom inostranosti — nekoliko napomena iz ugla međunarodnog privatnog prava, „Revija Kopaoničke Škole Prirodnog Prava” 2022, No 2.
Google Scholar

Đorđević S., Postupanje javnog beležnika prilikom zaključenja ugovora koji za predmet ima sticanje stvarnog prava na nepokretnosti koja se nalazi u inostranstvu — nekoliko napomena iz ugla međunarodnog privatnog prava, „Revija Kopaoničke Škole Prirodnog Prava” 2020, No 2.
Google Scholar

Đorđević S., Primena međunarodnog privatnog prava u javnobeležničkoj praksi (kratka uputstva i objašnjenja), strona notariatu serbskiego (Javnobeležnička komora Srbije): https://beleznik.org/public/documents/upload/uputstvo_za_primenu_mpp_u_jb_praksi.pdf [Dostęp: 13.04.2023 r.].
Google Scholar

Đorđević S., Some remarks on prevention and resolution of positive jurisdiction conflicts between Croatian (member state) and Serbian courts in crossborder succession cases — from Croatian (EU) and Serbian point of view, „Pravni Vjesnik” 2020, No 36 (2).
Google Scholar

Đurđević S., O potrebi izmene dvostranih ugovora o pravnoj pomoći u građanskim stvarima na snazi između Republike Srbije i država članica Evropske unije, „Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu” 2016, No 74.
Google Scholar

Jessel-Holst Ch., The Reform of Private International Law Acts in South East Europe, with Particular Regard to the West Balkan Region, „18 Annals Fac. L.U. Zenica” 2016, Vol. 133.
Google Scholar

Jovanović M., Inostrane registrovane istopolne zajednice života pred kolizionim pravilima srpskog meðunarodnog privatnog prava: crno-beli odraz slike duginih boja?, w: Zbornik „Liber amicorum Gašo Knežević” 2016.
Google Scholar

Krešić M., Yugoslav private law between the two World Wars, in: Modernisierung durch Transfer zwischen den Weltkriegen, Hrsg. T. Giaro, Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main, 2007.
Google Scholar

Lapajne S., Izenačenje mednarodnega privatnega in procesnega prava v slovanskih državah, „Slovenski pravnik” 1933, Nr 11/12.
Google Scholar

Matić Z., The Yugoslav Act Concerning Private International Law, „Netherlands International Law Review” 1983, Vol. 30, Issue 02.
Google Scholar

Nikolić A., Posledice nemogućnosti utvrđivanja sadržine merodavnog stranog prava u sudskim postupcima sa elementom inostranosti — de lege lata i de lege ferenda, w: Identitetski preobražaj Srbije, Prilozi projektu 2017 — kolektivna monografija, red. R. Vasić, B. Čučković, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Belgrad, 2018.
Google Scholar

Petrović M., Ugovor o ortakluku iz ugla međunarodnog privatnog prava srbije, „Revija Kopaoničke Škole Prirodnog Prava” 2022, No 2.
Google Scholar

Ristić B., Uloga klauzule javnog poretka kod ugovora sa međunarodnim elementom, „Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Novi Sad” 2018, No 52 (3).
Google Scholar

Šarčević P., The New Yugoslav Private International Law Act, „The American Journal of Comparative Law” 1985, Vol. 33, No. 2.
Google Scholar

Šaula V., Public policy and its role in contemporary circumstances, „Godišnjak pravnog fakulteta” 2019, Vol. 1 No. 41.
Google Scholar

Šaula V., Reform of private international law in countries successors of the former Yugoslavia: new legal challenges v. legal tradition, „Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Novi Sad” 2019, No 53 (4).
Google Scholar

Stančić M., Nasledna prava supružnika iz istopolnog braka zaključenog u inostranstvu i primena supstitucije „Revija Za Evropsko Pravo” 2016, Nr 18 (2—3).
Google Scholar

Stanivuković M., Živković M., Međunarodno privatno pravo: opšti deo, wyd. 7, Belgrad, 2021.
Google Scholar

Stanivuković M., Deset razloga zašto bi trebalo menjati Zakon o rešavanju sukoba zakona sa zakonima drugih zemalja (1982), „BRANIČ Journal of Legal Theory and Practice of the Bar Association of Serbia” 2020, No. 4.
Google Scholar

Stanivuković M., Lično ime deteta u srpskom međunarodnom privatnom pravu, „Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Novi Sad” 2017, vol. 51, br. 1.
Google Scholar

Stanivuković M., Reform of conflict rules for contracts in Serbia and the European Union law model, s. 439—457, https://cupdf.com/document/reform-of-conflict-rules-for-contracts-in-serbia-and-reform-of-conflict-rules-for.html?page=1 [Dostęp: 13.04.2023 r.].
Google Scholar

Stojšić-Dabetić J., Prinudne norme neposredne primene u međunarodnom privatnom pravu, „Pravo — teorija i praksa” 2018, Vol. 35, No 4—6.
Google Scholar

Živković M., Marjanović S., Nekoliko pitanja u vezi s primjenom međunarodnih ugovora u međunarodnom privatnom pravu republike srbije, „Pravni Vjesnik” 2019, Vol. 35, no 3/4.
Google Scholar

Živković M., Primena kolizione norme međunarodnog privatnog prava na pravo države sa nejedinstvenim pravnim područjem, „Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu” 1982, No 22.
Google Scholar

Živković M., Validity Of The Hague Conventions In The Field Of International Private Law In The Legal System Of The Federal Republic Of Yugoslavia, „Facta Universitatis. Law and Politics” 2001, No 5.
Google Scholar

Živković M., O potrebi pristupanja naše zemlje pojedinim haškim konvencijama iz oblasti međunarodnog privatnog prava, „Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu” 2004, No 45.
Google Scholar

Živković M., O primeni haškog protokola o merodavnom pravu za obaveze izdržavanja u međunarodnom privatnom pravu republike srbije, 2013, No 65.
Google Scholar

Tom 32 (2023)
Opublikowane: 2023-07-26

ISSN: 1896-7604

eISSN: 2353-9852

10.31261/PPGOS

Wydawca

Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego | University of Silesia Press

Prześlij tekst