The aim of the paper is to present prince Myshkin’s highly complex, almost labyrinthine
personality. Reading addresses and undermines all the homogenizing interpretations
(e.g. Lev Shestov’s notoriously malevolent reading of Myshkin) that aim
at discovering “one” truth about this character, be it positive or negative, and thus
fail to acknowledge its contradictory elements. I also intend to show that the prince
can be seen as much more of a “Shestovian,” tragic and divided figure as one could
initially think. Shestov’s philosophical thought inspires the investigations, first as
a starting point for the analysis of Myshkin criticisms in scholarly literature, then as
a polemical reference, and finally as a basis for formulating a lead thesis. I am led
to conclude that building Myshkin’s character, being as it is, largely inconsistent,
insecure, and errant in his moral evaluations of other people, Dostoevsky opposed
any attempts at exhausting, finalizing the identity of the other human being in the
abstract net of rational interpretations. At the same time Dostoevsky most powerfully
brought to light that which is most fragile, intimate and therefore prone to misunderstanding
or a hasty critique — the tragedy of an individual life.
Pobierz pliki
Zasady cytowania
Nr 1 (2017)
Opublikowane: 2017-04-15
Język Polski
Русский
English