U.S. 558 (2003), Scalia, dissenting.
Google Scholar
Abortion oraz Roe v. Wade. In: The Supreme Court A to Z. Ed. K. Jost. Washington D.C. 1998.
Google Scholar
Abraham H.J.: Justices, Presidents, Senators, Revised: The History of U.S. Supreme Court Appointments from Washington to Bush II. Lanham 2007.
Google Scholar
Baker v. Carr. 369 U.S. 186 (1962).
Google Scholar
Baker v. Wade. 478 U.S. 1022 (1986).
Google Scholar
Ball C.A.: From the Closet to the Court: Five LGBT Rights Lawsuits That Have Changed Our Nation. Boston 2010.
Google Scholar
Bickel A.M.: The Least Dangerous Branch. Supreme Court At the Bar of Politics. Indianapolis 1962.
Google Scholar
Boutilier v. Immigration and Naturalization Service. 387 U.S. 118 (1967).
Google Scholar
Bowers v. Hardwick. 478 U.S. 186 (1986).
Google Scholar
Brown v. Board of Education. 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
Google Scholar
Buchanan v. Bachelor. 405 U.S. 930 (1972).
Google Scholar
Bush v. Gore. 531 U.S. 98 (2000).
Google Scholar
Bush v. Gore: Question of Legitimacy. Ed. B. Ackerman. New York 2002.
Google Scholar
Carpenter D.: Flagrant Conduct. The Story of Lawrence v. Texas. How a Bedroom Arrest Decriminalized Gay Americans. New York 2012.
Google Scholar
Chcą walczyć ze ślubami homoseksualnymi. Karolina Północna znalazła już sposób. TVN24.pl 2 lipca 2015, http://www.tvn24.pl/wiadomosci‑ze‑swiata,2/malzenstwahomoseksualne‑w‑usa‑poludnie‑chce‑z‑nimi‑walczyc,556525.html (dostęp: 3.07.2015).
Google Scholar
Chemerinsky E.: Federal Judges Embrace LGBT Equality. „Contemporary Society” 2010, Vol. 44.
Google Scholar
Chokshi N.: Seven Attorneys‑General Won’t Defend Their Own State’s Gay‑MarriageBans. „Washington Post” 20.02.2014, http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/wp/2014/02/20/six‑attorneys‑general‑wont‑defend‑their‑own‑states‑gay‑marriage‑bans/ (dostęp: 3.07.2015).
Google Scholar
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. 558 U.S. 310 (2010).
Google Scholar
Collins P.: Friends of the Supreme Court: Interest Groups and Judicial Decision Making. New York 2008.
Google Scholar
Collins R.M.: Transforming America. Politics and Culture in the Reagan Years. New York 2007.
Google Scholar
Cooper v. Aaron. 358 U.S. 1 (1958).
Google Scholar
Defense of Marriage Act. Publ. L. 104—199, 1996.
Google Scholar
Doe v. Commonwealth’s Attorney for City of Richmond. 425 U.S. 901 (1976).
Google Scholar
Doyle W.: An American Insurrection: James Meredith and the Battle of Oxford, Mississippi, 1962. New York 2003.
Google Scholar
Dred Scott v. Sandford. 60 U.S. 393 (1957).
Google Scholar
Dudgeon v. United Kingdom. European Court of Human Rights, Series A, No. 45, 23 września 1981.
Google Scholar
Eskridge W.: Dishonorable Passions: Sodomy Laws in America, 1861—2003. New York 2008.
Google Scholar
Fellman D.: The Nationalization of American Civil Liberties. In: Essays on the Constitution of the United States. Eds. H.J. Abraham, M.J. Harmon. New York 1978.
Google Scholar
Fisher L.: The Supreme Court and Congress. Rival Interpretations. Washington D.C. 2008.
Google Scholar
Freedman S.: Continuity and Change: A Task of Reconciliation. „University of British Columbia Law Review” 1973, Vol. 8.
Google Scholar
Freyer T.A.: Little Rock on Trial: Cooper v. Aaron and School Desegregation. Lanham 2007.
Google Scholar
Fried C.: Saying What the Law Is: The Constitution in the Supreme Court. New York 2004.
Google Scholar
Griswold v. Connecticut. 381 U.S. 479 (1965).
Google Scholar
Hansford T.G., Spriggs J.F.: The Politics of Precedent on the United States Supreme Court. Princeton 2006.
Google Scholar
Hobson C.F.: The Marshall Court, 1801—1835: Law, Politics, and the Emergence of the Federal Judiciary. In: The United States Supreme Court: The Pursuit of Justice. Ed. Ch. Tomlins. Boston 2005.
Google Scholar
Hollingsworth v. Perry. 570 U.S. 12—144 (2013).
Google Scholar
House Republican Reaction to Supreme Court Ruling on Same‑Sex Marriage.C‑SPAN 27 czerwca 2013, http://www.c‑span.org/video/?313596‑1/house‑republican-reaction‑supreme‑court‑ruling‑samesex‑marriage(dostęp: 3.07.2015).
Google Scholar
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/ricksantorum‑statement‑gay‑marriage (dostęp: 3.07.2015).
Google Scholar
http://theweek.com/speedreads/563138/mikehuckabee‑gay‑marriage‑ruling‑not‑acquiesce‑imperial‑court (dostęp: 3.07.2015).
Google Scholar
https://soundcloud.com/buzzfeedandrew/cruz‑on‑hannity (dostęp: 3.07.2015).
Google Scholar
Jacobs A.: Wasn’t Built in a Day: The Subtle Transformation in Judicial Argument Over Gay Rights. „Wisconsin Law Review” 1996.
Google Scholar
Kerch K.I.: The Right to Privacy. In: The Bill of Rights in Modern America. Revised and Expanded. Eds. D.J. Bodenhamer, J.W. Ely, jr. Bloomington 2008.
Google Scholar
King v. Burwell. 576 U.S. 14—114 (2015).
Google Scholar
Klarman M.J.: From the Closet to the Altar. Courts, Backlash, and the Struggle for Same-Sex Marriage. New York 2013.
Google Scholar
Laidler P.: Sąd Najwyższy Stanów Zjednoczonych Ameryki: od prawa do polityki. Kraków 2011.
Google Scholar
Lawrence and Garner v. Texas. 539 U.S. 558 (2003).
Google Scholar
Lis-Staranowicz D.: Legitymizacja sądowej kontroli konstytucyjności prawa w Stanach Zjednoczonych Ameryki. Olsztyn 2012.
Google Scholar
Lochner v. New York. 198 U.S. 45 (1905).
Google Scholar
Longley K., Mayer J.D., Schaller M., Sloan J.W.: Deconstructing Reagan. Conservative Mythology and America’s Fortieth President. New York 2007.
Google Scholar
Loving v. Virginia. 388 U.S. 1 (1967).
Google Scholar
Ludwikowska A.M.: System prawa amerykańskiego. Toruń 2000.
Google Scholar
MacKeever R.J.: The U.S. Supreme Court: A Political and Legal Analysis. Manchester 1997.
Google Scholar
Małajny R.M.: Trzy teorie podzielonej władzy. Katowice 2003.
Google Scholar
Manual Enterprises v. Day. 370 U.S. 478 (1962).
Google Scholar
Marbury v. Madison. 5 U.S. 137 (1803).
Google Scholar
McLoughlin E.C.: Most States to Abide By Supreme Court’s Same‑Sex Marriage, But…, CNN.com 30 czerwca 2015, http://edition.cnn.com/2015/06/29/us/same‑sexmarriage‑state‑by‑state/ (dostęp: 3.07.2015).
Google Scholar
Milkis S.M.: Political Parties and COnstitutional Government. Remaking American Democracy. Baltimore 1999.
Google Scholar
Miller D.H.: Freedom to Differ. The Shaping of the Gay and Lesbian Struggle for Civil Rights. New York 1998.
Google Scholar
Obergefell v. Hodges. 576 U.S. 14—556 (2015).
Google Scholar
One, Inc. v. Olesen. 355 U.S. 371 (1958).
Google Scholar
Palko v. Connecticut. 302 U.S. 319 (1937).
Google Scholar
Plessy v. Ferguson. 163 U.S. 537 (1896).
Google Scholar
Polsby N.W., Mayer W.G.: Idological Cohesion in the American Two‑Party System. In: On Parties. Essays Honoring Austin Ranney. Eds. N.W. Polsby, R.E. Wolfinger. Berkeley 1999.
Google Scholar
Prop. 8 and DOMA: the Road to Gay Marriage. „Los Angeles Times 21.04.2014, http://www.latimes.com/local/la‑me‑gay‑marriage‑sg‑storygallery.html (dostęp: 3.07.2015).
Google Scholar
Racial Integrity Act SB 219 (1924).
Google Scholar
Remarks by the President on the Supreme Court Decision on Marriage Equality. 26 czerwca 2015, https://www.whitehouse.gov/the‑press‑office/2015/06/26/remarks‑presidentsupreme‑court‑decision‑marriage‑equality (dostęp: 3.07.2015).
Google Scholar
Roe v. Wade. 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
Google Scholar
Romer v. Evans. 517 U.S. 620 (1996).
Google Scholar
Rossinow D.: The Reagan Era. A History of the 1908s. New York 2015.
Google Scholar
Samples J.: The Fallacy of Campaign Finance Reform. Chicago 2006.
Google Scholar
Schudson M.: America’s Ignorant Voters. In: Principles and Practice of American Politics. Classic and Contemporary Readings. Eds. S. Kernell, S.S. Smith. Washington D.C. 2007.
Google Scholar
Schwartz H.: Packing the Courts. The Conservative Campaign to Rewrite the Constitution. New York 1988.
Google Scholar
Segal J., Spaeth H.J., Benesh S.: The Supreme Court in American Legal System. New York 2005.
Google Scholar
Semm P.T., Sanchez-Weston C.: Waiting for Change: Obama and the LGBT Community. In: Grading 44th President. A Report Card on Barack Obama’s First Term as a Progressive Leader. Eds. L. Esposito, L.L. Finley. Santa Barbara 2012.
Google Scholar
Skrzypiński D.: Odpowiedzialność sędziów w świetle zjawiska judykalizacji polityki. „Wrocławskie Studia Politologiczne” 2014, nr 17.
Google Scholar
Smith M.M., Powell L.: Dark Money, Super PACs, and the 2012 Election. Lexington 2013.
Google Scholar
Spaetha H., Segala J.: The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York 1993.
Google Scholar
Stein M.: Sexual Injustice: Supreme Court Decisions from Griswold to Roe. Chapel Hill 2005.
Google Scholar
Stone A.L.: Gay Rights at the Ballot Box. Minneapolis 2012.
Google Scholar
Stookey J., Watson G.: Shaping America: The Politics of Supreme Court Appointments. New York 1995.
Google Scholar
Tribe L.: Lawrence v. Texas: The Fundamental Right that Dare Not Speak its Name. „Harvard Law Review” 2004, Vol. 117.
Google Scholar
Tushnet M.: Taking the Constitutiona Away from the Courts. New York 2000.
Google Scholar
United States v. Windsor. 570 U.S. 12—307 (2013).
Google Scholar
Wieciech T.: Anglosaska formuła politycznego konstytucjonalizmu. Kraków 2015.
Google Scholar