https://doi.org/10.31261/WSS.2023.07.04
The Anthropocene artwork is situated at the art/science interface because the Anthropocene is itself a scientific construction. Since the Anthropocene is based on effects of technological development that are by no means intentional, it cannot be contained by ethical imperatives. Rather, it is the result of an epistemology that fails to recognize actants as objects. Therefore, Bruno Latour calls for an aesthetics that propagates feedback effects. Such an epistemically centered art should limit itself to the multiplication of the possible and give up its autonomy. This doctrine is contradicted by Latour himself, insofar as the ensemble of actants, together with the celestial body Gaia populated by life in the Critical Zones, is an unknown and hardly scientifically penetrated phenomenon. Thus, a border of non-knowledge runs through ecological art, which is located in the middle of a transformation movement.
Download files
Citation rules
No. 7 (2023)
Published: 2023-12-18
10.321261/WSS