Prawo publiczne w międzynarodowym arbitrażu handlowym z udziałem państwa

Anita Garnuszek

doi:10.31261/PPPM.2017.20.04

Published: 2017-06-29

Vol. 20 (2017)

Public law in international commercial arbitration with state participation

Anita Garnuszek

Section: Studies

https://doi.org/10.31261/PPPM.2017.20.04

Abstract

The paper deals with the issue of application of public law in international commercial arbitration involving states. The main purpose of the author was to determine whether arbitrators may apply or take into account both public law rules of the legis contractus and of the third state. The author considered a possibility of application of public national and international law. Another purpose of the paper was to analyse whether acts of state should be treated as legal norms or facts. At the beginning the author paid attention on the distinction between the process of application and taking into account of public law. Subsequently, analysis focused on a possibility of application of public law being part of legis contractus. Afterwards, the author deliberated whether public law rules of a third state may be applied as overriding mandatory rules. Lastly, it was considered whether public law and especially acts of state could be qualified as facts. The author came to the conclusion that under certain circumstances arbitrators may apply or take into account both public law rules being part of legis contractus and those of third states’ legal systems and of public international law.

Keywords:

public law , international commercial arbitration , states in international arbitration , private international law

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Garnuszek, A. (2017). Public law in international commercial arbitration with state participation. Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego (“Problems of Private International law”), 20, 95–114. https://doi.org/10.31261/PPPM.2017.20.04

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.

1. License

The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.

2. Author’s Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.

If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".

ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).

3. User Rights

Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.

4. Co-Authorship

If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.

I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.

References

Azeredo da Silveira, M.: Trade sanctions and international sales: an inquiry into international arbitration and commercial litigation. Alphen aan den Rijn 2014.
Google Scholar

Barraclough, A., Waincymer, J.: Mandatory rules of law in international commercial arbitration. „Melbourne Journal of International Law” 2005, no. 6.
Google Scholar

Bermann, G.A.: International arbitration and private international law. General course on private international law. In: Recueil de Cours. No. 381. The Hague 2015.
Google Scholar

Bermann, G.A.: Mandatory rules of law in international arbitration. In: Conflict of laws in international arbitration. Eds. F. Ferrari, S. K röll. Munich 2011.
Google Scholar

Bjorklund, A.K.: Mandatory rules of law and investment arbitration. „The American Review of International Arbitration” 2007, no. 18.
Google Scholar

Blessing, M.: Mandatory rules of law versus party autonomy in international arbitration. „Journal of International Arbitration” 1997, no. 14.
Google Scholar

Böckstiegel, K.‑H.: The legal rules applicable in international commercial arbitration involving states or state‑controlled enterprises. In: International arbitration: 60 years of ICC arbitration: a look at the future. Paris, ICC Court of Arbitration, 1984.
Google Scholar

Brekoulakis, S.: Arbitrability and conflict of jurisdictions: the (diminishing) relevance of lex fori and lex loci arbitri. In: Conflict of laws in international arbitration. Eds. F. Ferrari, S. Kröll. Munich 2011.
Google Scholar

Crawford, J.R.: Brownlie’s Principles of International Law. Ed. 8. Oxford 2012.
Google Scholar

Czachórski, W.: Zobowiązania. Zarys wykładu. Wyd. 10. Warszawa 2007.
Google Scholar

Derains, Y.: Public policy and the law applicable to the dispute in international arbitration. In: Comparative arbitration practice and public policy in arbitration. ICCA Congress Series. No. 3. Ed. P. Sanders. Deventer–Boston 1987.
Google Scholar

Dogmatyka prawna. W: Leksykon współczesnej teorii i filozofii prawa. Red. J. Zajadło. Warszawa 2007.
Google Scholar

Dz.U. 1964, nr 43, poz. 296 z poźn. zm.
Google Scholar

Hochstrasser, D.: Choice of law and „foreig” mandatory rules in international arbitration. „Journal of International Arbitration” 1994, no. 11.
Google Scholar

Hochstrasser, D.: Public and mandatory law in international arbitration. In: Towards a uniform international arbitration law? Ed. E. Gaillard. Huntington–New York 2005.
Google Scholar

Hoffmann, B. von: Internationally mandatory rules of law before arbitral tribunals: a general outline. In: Acts of state and arbitration. Ed. K.‑H. Böckstiegel. Köln 1997.
Google Scholar

ICC Arbitration Rules z dnia 1 marca 2017 r., https://iccwbo.org/dispute‑resolution‑services/arbitration/rules‑of‑arbitration/.
Google Scholar

Institute de Droit International: Resolution on Arbitration between States, State Enterprises, or State Entities, and Foreign Enterprises, 1989. ICSID Review 1990, no. 5, art. 2.
Google Scholar

Kessedjian, C.: Mandatory rules of law in international arbitration: what are mandatory rules? „The American Review of International Arbitration” 2007, vol. 18.
Google Scholar

Kozłowski, A.: Prawo międzynarodowe jako prawo właściwe w arbitrażu międzynarodowym – zarys koncepcji. W: Arbitraż w prawie międzynarodowym. Red. C. M ik. Warszawa 2014.
Google Scholar

Lazareff, S.: Mandatory extraterritorial application of national law. „Arbitration International” 1995, no. 11.
Google Scholar

Lew, J.D.M., Mistelis, L.A., Kröll, S.M.: Comparative International Commercial Arbitration. Alphen aan den Rijn 2003.
Google Scholar

Lew, J.D.M.: Relevance of conflict of law rules in the practice of arbitration. In: Planning efficient arbitration proceedings: the law applicable in international arbitration. ICCA Congress Series. No. 7. Ed. A.J. van den Berg. The Hague—Cambridge 1996.
Google Scholar

Maniruzzaman, A.F.M.: International arbitrator and mandatory public law rules in the context of state contracts: an overview. „Journal of International Arbitration” 1990, no. 7.
Google Scholar

Mataczyński, M.: Przepisy wymuszające swoje zastosowanie w prawie prywatnym międzynarodowym. Kraków 2005.
Google Scholar

Matray, L.: Embargo and prohibition of performance. In: Acts of state and arbitration. Ed. K.‑H. Böckstiegel. Köln 1997.
Google Scholar

Mayer, P.: Les lois de police. In: Droit international privé: travaux du Comité Français de Droit International Privé, hors‑série. „Journée du Cinquantenaire” 1988.
Google Scholar

Mayer, P.: Mandatory rules of law in international arbitration. „Arbitration International” 1986, no. 2.
Google Scholar

Pazdan, M.: Prawo prywatne międzynarodowe. Wyd. 15. Warszawa 2012.
Google Scholar

Petrochilos, G.: Procedural law in international arbitration. Oxford 2004.
Google Scholar

Pilich, M.: Państwo jako uczestnik międzynarodowego obrotu cywilnoprawnego (zagadnienia wybrane). W: Rozprawy z prawa prywatnego. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana Profesorowi Wojciechowi Popiołkowi. Red. M. Pazdan, M. Jagielska, E. Rott‑Pietrzyk, M. Szpunar. Warszawa 2017.
Google Scholar

Poczobut, J.: Stosowanie krajowego prawa publicznego w międzynarodowym arbitrażu handlowym. W: Arbitraż i mediacja. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana doktorowi Andrzejowi Tynelowi. Red. M. Łaszczuk i in. Warszawa 2012.
Google Scholar

Popiołek, W.: Znaczenie przepisów „prawa publicznego” różnych systemów prawnych dla stosunków umownych handlu zagranicznego. „Problemy Prawne Handlu Zagranicznego” 1988, T. 12.
Google Scholar

Radicati di Brozolo, L.G.: Mandatory rules and international arbitration. „The American Review of International Arbitration” 2012, no. 23.
Google Scholar

Radwański, Z.: Problemy metodologiczne dogmatyki prawa cywilnego. W: Zagadnienia metodologiczne prawoznawstwa. Materiały z sesji naukowej, Łódź 27–28 marca 1980 r. Red. J. Wróblewski. Wrocław 1982.
Google Scholar

Rezolucja Rady Bezpieczeństwa ONZ nr 661 z dnia 6 sierpnia 1990 r. S/RES/661(1990).
Google Scholar

Rozporządzenie Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (WE) nr 593/2008 z dnia 17 czerwca 2008 r. w sprawie prawa właściwego dla zobowiązań umownych (Rzym I). Dz.Urz. UE L 177/6.
Google Scholar

Rozporządzenie Rady (EWG) nr 2340/90 z dnia 8 sierpnia 1990 r. w sprawie zakazu wymiany handlowej z Irakiem i Kuwejtem. Dz.Urz. UE L 213.
Google Scholar

Rozporządzenie Rady (UE) nr 833/2014 z dnia 31 lipca 2014 r. dotyczące środków ograniczających w związku z działaniami Rosji destabilizującymi sytuację na Ukrainie. Dz.Urz. UE L 229/1.
Google Scholar

Rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów z dnia 21 grudnia 1981 r. w sprawie ograniczenia importu inwestycyjnych towarów przemysłowych. Dz.U. 1981, nr 32, poz. 184.
Google Scholar

Sheppard, A.: Mandatory rules in international commercial arbitration – an English law perspective. „The American Review of International Arbitration” 2007, no. 18.
Google Scholar

Sznajder‑Peroń, K.: Zagadnienia związane z pojmowaniem i stosowaniem prawa właściwego. W: „System Prawa Prywatnego”. T. 20A: Prawo prywatne międzynarodowe. Red. M. Pazdan. Warszawa 2014.
Google Scholar

Tomaszewski, M.: Komentarz do art. 8. W: Prawo prywatne międzynarodowe. Komentarz. Red. J. Poczobut. Warszawa 2017.
Google Scholar

Ustawa z dnia 4 lutego 2011 r. Prawo prywatne międzynarodowe. Dz.U. 2011, nr 80, poz. 432.
Google Scholar

van Houtte, H.: Trade sanctions and arbitration. „International Business Law” 1997, no. 25.
Google Scholar

Voser, N.: Mandatory rules of law as a limitation on the law applicable in international commercial arbitration. „The American Review of International Arbitration” 1996, no. 7.
Google Scholar

Wyrok arbitrażowy CAM z dnia 20 lipca 1992 r. w sprawie nr 1491 Subcontractor v. Main Contractor. „Yearbook Commercial Arbitration” [Ed. A.J. van den Berg]. 1993, vol. 18.
Google Scholar

Wyrok częściowy trybunału arbitrażowego z dnia 9 września 1983 r., F.R. German Engineering Company v. Polish buyer. „Yearbook Commercial Arbitration” [Ed. A.J. van den Berg], 1987, no. 12.
Google Scholar

Wyrok Izby Lordów z dnia 6 lipca 1978 r. Czarnikow Ltd. v. Rolimpex, 1978, 17 ILM 1384.
Google Scholar

Wyrok Trybunału Arbitrażowego ICC w sprawie nr 2138. „Journal du Droit International” 1975.
Google Scholar

Wyrok Trybunału Arbitrażowego ICC w sprawie nr 2139. „Journal du Droit International” 1975.
Google Scholar

Wyrok Trybunału Arbitrażowego ICC w sprawie nr 2216. „Journal du Droit International” 1975.
Google Scholar

Zachariasiewicz, M.A.: Przepisy wymuszające swoje zastosowanie. W: „System Prawa Prywatnego”. T. 20A: Prawo prywatne międzynarodowe. Red. M. Pazdan. Warszawa 2014.
Google Scholar

Ziembiński, Z.: Metodologiczne zagadnienia prawoznawstwa. Warszawa 1974.
Google Scholar

Vol. 20 (2017)
Published: 2017-06-30

ISSN: 1896-7604

eISSN: 2353-9852

10.31261/PPGOS

Publisher

Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego | University of Silesia Press

Licence CC

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Submit