https://doi.org/10.31261/PPPM.2018.22.02
The European Union holds no competence to enact substantive family law, however is entitled to exercise competences in the field of private international law sensu largo (rules on conflict-of-laws and international civil procedure). In the treaties this branch of law is referred to as “measures of judicial cooperation in civil matters” (Art. 81 TFEU). Such a cooperation not generally interfere with the fundamental legal principles of the forum (member state). One of the classic solutions, included in the general part of this branch of law, is the public policy clause (orde public clause, Vorbehaltsklausel). Despite of the limited scope of European Union’s competences, the recent development of European law raises issues related to the juridical expression of the identity of marriage. The presented detailed study of some recent legislative procedures shows that it could be otherwise. The possible affecting the understanding and identity of marriage in a Member State by EU Regulations No 2016/1103 and 2016/1104 are subject to the article. Arguments presented inter alia by the Polish parliament and governments in recent years during the legislative processes aiming to adopt the discussed regulations at the EU level, have to be supported. It seems, that the abovementioned remarks concerning the consequences of the regulations on matrimonial property matters and registered partnerships, which were subject to enhanced cooperation in several member states, could be also important for these states. Some of them can be not aware of all future practical consequences of the discussed new EU regulations. In particular the attention shall be paid to the practical effect of “importing” of foreign legal concepts and judgments, that govern the institutionalization of couples. Secondly, what can be astonishing, foreign law governing the details of contract applies not only within parties to contract but also with third parties in above mentioned situations, where the couple is not habitually resident abroad. The greatest concerns are raised by provisions, that — despite the lack of EU’s competences in field of family law — in practice not only amend private international law, but also cause unwelcome changes to substantive rules governing marriage (including rules perceived as fundamental ones in the state — e.g. marriage perceived in a common scope as the union between one man and one woman). The measures of judicial cooperation in civil matters should not result in obligation to recognize foreign redefined legal concept of marriage, because this would mean circumventing of the conferred powers principle (Art. 4 of Treaty on European Union). The motto of the European Union: In varietate concordia (United in diversity) is also worth recalling. Its essence should generally argue for a more cautious approach by the EU institutions and groups of scientists interfering with substantial family law matters of Members States.
Download files
Citation rules
Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
Vol. 22 (2018)
Published: 2018-06-30
10.31261/PPGOS

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.