Adams, E. (2010). The joys and challenges of semi-structured interviewing. Community Practitioner, 83 (7), 18–21. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/20701187/
Google Scholar
Akerlof, K. L., Allegra, A., Nelson, S., Gonnella, C., Washbourne, C., & Tyler, C. (2022). Global perspectives on scientists’ roles in legislative policymaking. Policy Sciences, 55 , 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-022-09457-3
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-022-09457-3
Google Scholar
Basaran, T., & Olsson, C. (2018). Becoming International: On Symbolic Capital, Conversion and Privilege. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 46(2), 96–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829817739636
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829817739636
Google Scholar
Baynham, M. (2011). Stance, positioning, and alignment in narratives of professional experience. Language in Society, 40, 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0047404510000898
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404510000898
Google Scholar
Beach, D., Pedersen, R. B. (2013). Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.2556282
Google Scholar
Beach, D., Pedersen, R. B. (2018). Selecting Appropriate Cases When Tracing Causal Mechanisms. Sociological Methods & Research, 47(4), 837–871. https://doi. org/10.1177/0049124115622510
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124115622510
Google Scholar
Bennett, A., Checkel, J. T., Jacobs, A. M., Schimmelfennig, F., Waldner, D., Evangelista, M., … Pouliot, V. (2015). Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytical Tool. (A. Bennett & J. T. Checkel, Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Berling, T. V., & Bueger, C. (2013). Practical reflexivity and political science: Strategies for relating scholarship and political practice. PS – Political Science and Politics, 46 (1), 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096512001278
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096512001278
Google Scholar
Berling, T. V., & Bueger, C. (2017). Expertise in the age of post-factual politics: An outline of reflexive strategies. Geoforum, 84 , 332–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. geoforum.2017.05.008
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.05.008
Google Scholar
Berndtson, E. (2016). Political Scientist as a Historian. Serendipities – Journal for the Sociology and History of the Social Sciences, 1 (1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.7146/ serendipities.v1i1.122865
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/serendipities.v1i1.122865
Google Scholar
Boedeltje, F., & van Houtum, H. (2011). Brussels is Speaking: The Adverse Speech Geo‑Politics of the European Union Towards its Neighbours. Geopolitics, 16(1), 130–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2010.493791
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2010.493791
Google Scholar
Bortolini, M., & Cossu, A. (2020). In the field but not of the field: Clifford Geertz, Robert Bellah, and the practices of interdisciplinarity. European Journal of Social Theory, 23 (3), 328–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431018823140
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431018823140
Google Scholar
Bouabid, H., & Martin, B. R. (2009). Evaluation of Moroccan research using a bibliometric-based approach: investigation of the validity of the h-index. Scientometrics, 78, 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2005-4
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2005-4
Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507
Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503621749
Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar
Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2018). Doing Interviews (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529716665
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529716665
Google Scholar
Bueger, C. (2011). The clash of practice: Political controversy and the United Nations Peacebuilding Commission. Evidence and Policy, 7(2), 171–191. https://doi. org/10.1332/174426411X579216
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/174426411X579216
Google Scholar
Bueger, C. (2014a). From Expert Communities to Epistemic Arrangements: Situating Expertise in International Relations. In M. Mayer, M. Carpes, & R. Knoblich (Eds.), The Global Politics of Science and Technology – Vol. 1. Concepts from International Relations and Other Disciplines (pp. 39–54). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55007-2
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55007-2_2
Google Scholar
Bueger, C. (2014b). Pathways to practice: Praxiography and international politics. European Political Science Review, 6 (3), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1755773913000167
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773913000167
Google Scholar
Bueger, C., & Gardinger, F. (2018). International Practice Theory (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73350-0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73350-0_4
Google Scholar
Carrozza, C., Cruz, A. R., Nogueira, C., Pinto, H., & Uyarra, E. (2020). European knowledge and entrepreneurial ecosystems: Networks within climate change and adaptation research. Thunderbird International Business Review, 62, 579–591. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22167
Google Scholar
Cassi , L., Corrocher, N., Malerba, F., & Vonortas, N. (2008). Research Networks as Infrastructure for Knowledge Diffusion in European Regions. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17(7–8), 663–676. https://doi. org/10.1080/10438590701785603
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590701785603
Google Scholar
Cetina, K. K. (1992). The Couch, the Cathedral, and the Laboratory: On the Relationship between Experiment and Laboratory in Science. In Science as Practice and Culture (pp. 112–138). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi. org/10.7208/9780226668208-005
Google Scholar
Champagne, P., & Christin, O. (2012). Pierre Bourdieu : Une initiation. Lyon: Presses universitaires de Lyon. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pul.5160
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pul.5109
Google Scholar
Chessa, A., Morescalchi, A., Pammolli, F., Penner, O., Petersen, A. M., & Riccaboni, M. (2013). Is Europe Evolving Toward an Integrated Research Area? Science, 339, 650–651. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227970
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227970
Google Scholar
Chrysomallidis, C. (2018). EU Research and Technology Policy: Balancing Between the National and the EU Dimension. In N. Karampekios, I. Oikonomou, & E. G. Carayannis (Eds.), The Emergence of EU Defence Research Policy: From Innovation to Militarization (pp. 57–73). Cham: Springer. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-319-68807-7
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68807-7_4
Google Scholar
Cooper, H., Patall, E., & Lindsay, J. (2009). Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis. In L. Bickman & D. J. Rog (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods (pp. 344–370). Los Angeles, London: SAGE. https://doi. org/10.4135/9781483348858
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348858.n11
Google Scholar
Criekemans, D. (2021). Geopolitical Schools of Thought: A Concise Overview from 1890 till 2020, and Beyond. In D. Criekemans (Ed.), Geopolitics and International Relations (pp. 97–155). Brill | Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004432086
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004432086_005
Google Scholar
Cuevas-Garcia, C. (2021). Constructing (Inter)Disciplinary Identities: Biographical Narrative and the Reproduction of Academic Selves and Communities. In K. Kastenhofer & S. Molyneux-Hodgson (Eds.), Community and Identity in Contemporary Technosciences (pp. 247–262). Cham: Springer. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-030-61728-8
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61728-8_12
Google Scholar
Curbatov, O., & Pavlidis, P. (2016). La Diplomatie Académique: vers un patrimoine culturel immatériel des communautés universitaires. Illustration holistique et inclusive de la diplomatie scientifique, culturelle et universitaire. In Culture and Education in the Develpment of the Human Capital in Arctic (pp. 1–13). Yakutsk: Arctic State Institute of Culture and Arts: HAL Open Science. Retrieved from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01496155
Google Scholar
Dandashly, A., Dijkstra, H., Marafona, M., Noutcheva, G., Paikin, Z., Blockmans, S., … Suslov, A. (2021). Multipolarity and EU Foreign and Security Policy: Divergent Approaches to Conflict and Crisis Response (JOINT Research Papers No. 6). Retrieved from https://www.jointproject.eu/2021/12/06/multipolarity-and-eu-fo reign-and-security-policy-divergent-approaches-to-conflict-and-crisis-response/
Google Scholar
Davies, S. R. (2021). Atmospheres of science: Experiencing scientific mobility. Social Studies of Science, 51 (2), 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720953520
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720953520
Google Scholar
De Fina, A. (2011). Researcher and informant roles in narrative interactions: Constructions of belonging and foreign‑ness. Language in Society, 40 , 27–38. https:// doi.org/10.1017/S0047404510000862
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404510000862
Google Scholar
De Fina, A., & Perrino, S. (2011). Introduction: Interviews vs. natural contexts: A false dilemma. Language in Society, 40, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0047404510000849
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404510000849
Google Scholar
Demetriou, C. (2012). Processual Comparative Sociology: Building on the Approach of Charles Tilly. Sociological Theory, 30(1), 51–65. https://doi. org/10.1177/0735275112437172
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112437172
Google Scholar
Directorate‑General for Research and Innovation (DG RTD) (2026). EU Strengthens Science Diplomacy and Research Security to Support Global Research Coopera tion. https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/news/all-research-and-innova tion-news/eu-strengthens-science-diplomacy-and-research-security-support-global ‑research‑cooperation‑2026‑02‑27_en
Google Scholar
Duran, M. (2021). Regional Diplomacy: Re-Territorialisation as a Piece in the Neo-Medieval Puzzle? In D. Criekemans (Ed.), Geopolitics and International Relations (pp. 322–344). Brill | Nijhoff.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004432086_012
Google Scholar
Eagleton-Pierce, M. (2011). Advancing a Reflexive International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 39(3), 805–823. https://doi. org/10.1177/0305829811402709
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811402709
Google Scholar
Eggeling, K. A. (2021). At Work With Practice Theory, or How to See International Politics in an Empty Chair. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 50(1), 149–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298211055217
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298211055217
Google Scholar
Eriksen, E. O. (2020). Banishing dominance in Europe: The case for regional cosmopolitanism. European Journal of International Relations, 26 (3), 742–766. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1354066119882067
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066119882067
Google Scholar
Ester, P., & Nispen, P. Van. (2013). Foreign Policy and The Cultural Factor – A Research and Education Agenda (MEDAC Publications in Mediterranean IR and Diplomacy). Retrieved from https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/bitstream/123456789/46418/1/Foreign_policy_and_the_cultural_factor_a_research_ and_education_agenda_2013.pdf
Google Scholar
Felt, U. (2017). Under the Shadow of Time: Where Indicators and Academic Values Meet. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 3 , 53–63. https://doi. org/10.17351/ests2017.109
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2017.109
Google Scholar
Galletta, A. (2013). Mastering the Semi-Structured Interview and Beyond. Qualitative Studies in Psychology . New York, London: New York University Press. https:// doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814732939.001.0001
Google Scholar
Georgakakis, D. (2009). The Historical and Political Sociology of the European Union: A Uniquely French Methodological Approach. French Politics, 8(2), 111–115. https://doi.org/10.1057/fp.2010.10
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/fp.2010.10
Google Scholar
Georgakakis, D., & de Lassale, M. (2007). Genèse et structure d’un capital institutionnel européen: Les très hauts fonctionnaires de la Commission européenne. Le Seuil, 1 (166–167), 38–53. Retrieved from https://www.cairn.info/revue-actes de‑la‑recherche‑en‑sciences‑sociales‑2007‑1‑page‑38.htm
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/arss.166.0039
Google Scholar
Georgakakis, D., & de Lassale, M. (2008). Where Have All the Lawyers Gone? Structure and Transformations of the Top European Commission Officials’ Legal Training (EUI Working Papers No. 38). Florence: European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies. Retrieved from https://cadmus. eui.eu/handle/1814/10032
Google Scholar
Grigorescu, F. (2017). MEDIGENE Program Rewarded With the European Stars Award 2017. Acta Endocrinologica, 13(4), 512–513. https://doi.org/10.4183/ aeb.2017.512
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4183/aeb.2017.512
Google Scholar
Gstöhl, S. (2014). The European Union’s Different Neighbourhood Models. In
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315686707
Google Scholar
E. O. Eriksen & J. E. Fossum (Eds.), The European Union’s Non-Members: Independence under hegemony? (pp. 17–35). London: Routledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781315751030
Google Scholar
Gu, Z. (2025). Two separated worlds: On the preference of influence in life science and biomedical research. Journal of Infometrics, 19 (2), 101641, 1–21. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.joi.2025.101641
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2025.101641
Google Scholar
Guzzini, S. (2017). Power and cause. Journal of International Relations and Development, 20 , 737–759. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-016-0002-z
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-016-0002-z
Google Scholar
Guzzini, S. (2020). Power in Communitarian Evolution (DIIS Working Paper No. 04). DIIS Working Paper. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies. Retrieved from https://pure.diis.dk/ws/files/3593478/Guzzini_DIIS_ WP_2020_04._Power_in_communitarian_evolution_.pdf
Google Scholar
Hadfield, A. (2021). EU foreign affairs and the future: multilevel opportunities vs multilayered risks. In C. Damro, E. Heins, & D. Scott (Eds.), European Futures: Challenges and Crossroads for the European Union of 2050 (pp. 148–163). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003009733
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003009733
Google Scholar
Hamati-Ataya, I. (2011). The “Problem of Values” and International Relations scholarship: From applied reflexivity to Reflexivism. International Studies Review, 13, 259–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2011.01024.x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2011.01024.x
Google Scholar
Hamati-Ataya, I. (2012). Reflectivity, reflexivity, reflexivism: IR’s “reflexive turn” – and beyond. European Journal of International Relations, 19 (4), 669–694. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1354066112437770
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066112437770
Google Scholar
Hamati-Ataya, I. (2018a). Bourdieu-in-the-Making: On the State and the Craft of Reflexive Sociology. European Political Science, 17 , 296–303. https://doi.org/10.1057/ eps.2015.96
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2015.96
Google Scholar
Hamati-Ataya, I. (2018b). The ‘vocation’ redux: A post-Weberian perspective from the sociology of knowledge. Current Sociology, 66 (7), 995–1012. https://doi. org/10.1177/0011392118756472
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392118756472
Google Scholar
Heilbron, J., Boncourt, T., & Timans, R. (2018). The European Research Area in the Social and Human Sciences: Between National Closure and American Hegemony. In J. Heilbron, G. Sorá, & T. Boncourt (Eds.), The Social and Human Sciences in Global Power Relations (pp. 153–181). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-319-73299-2
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73299-2_6
Google Scholar
Hesjedal, M. B., Åm, H., Sørensen, K. H., & Strand, R. (2020). Transforming Scientists’ Understanding of Science–Society Relations. Stimulating Double-Loop Learning when Teaching RRI. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 1633–1653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00208-2
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00208-2
Google Scholar
Hoenig, B. (2017). Competing for Status: Dynamics of Scientific Disciplines in the European Transnational Field. Serendipities – Journal for the Sociology and History of the Social Sciences, 2 (1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.25364/11.2:2017.1.6
Google Scholar
Jeon, J. (2019). Rethinking Scientific Habitus: Toward a Theory of Embodiment, Institutions, and Stratification of Science. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 5 , 160–172. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2019.303
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2019.303
Google Scholar
Kaiser, W. (2017). One narrative or several? Politics, cultural elites, and citizens in constructing a ‘New Narrative for Europe.’ National Identities, 19(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2016.1265491
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2016.1265491
Google Scholar
Kaiser, W., & McMahon, R. (2017). Narrating European integration: transnational actors and stories. National Identities, 19 (2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/14 608944.2016.1274722
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2016.1274722
Google Scholar
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72 (12), 2954–2965. https://doi. org/10.1111/jan.13031
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
Google Scholar
Karawan, I. A. (2002). Identity and Foreign Policy: The Case of Egypt. In S. Telhami & M. Barnett (Eds.), Identity and Foreign Policy in the Middle East (pp. 155–168). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Google Scholar
Kausch, K. (2021). Collateral Damage: How EU Internal Policies Shape Crises and Conflict Abroad (JOINT Research Papers No. 5). Retrieved from https://www. jointproject.eu/2021/12/06/collateral-damage-how-eu-internal-policies-shape crises-and-conflict-abroad/
Google Scholar
Knappe, H. (2021). Representation as practice: agency and relationality in transnational civil society. Journal of International Relations and Development, 24, 430–454. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-020-00197-6
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-020-00197-6
Google Scholar
Kontar, Y. Y., Ismail-Zadeh, A., Berkman, P. A., Duda, P. I., Gluckman, S. P., Kelman, I., & Murray, V. (2021). Knowledge exchange through science diplomacy to assist disaster risk reduction. Progress in Disaster Science, 11(100188), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100188
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100188
Google Scholar
Kustermans, J. (2016). Parsing the Practice Turn: Practice, Practical Knowledge, Practices. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44 (2), 175–196. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0305829815613045
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829815613045
Google Scholar
Kvale, S. (2006). Dominance Through Interviews and Dialogues. Qualitative Inquiry, 12 (3), 480–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406286235
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406286235
Google Scholar
Kwiek, M. (2016). The European research elite: a cross-national study of highly productive academics in 11 countries. Higher Education, 71 , 379–397. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10734-015-9910-x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9910-x
Google Scholar
Laffan, B. (2021). The future of Europe: alternative scenarious. In C. Damro, E. Heins, & D. Scott (Eds.), European Futures: Challenges and Crossroads for the European Union of 2050 (pp. 202–217). London: Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003009733-16
Google Scholar
Lebaron, F., & Le Roux, B. (2013). Géométrie du champ. Actes de La Recherche En Sciences Sociales, 5 (200), 106–109. https://doi.org/10.3917/arss.200.0106
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/arss.200.0106
Google Scholar
Levallois, A., Dandashly, A., Maphalala, N., & Ünver, A. (2021). Regional Fragmentation and EU Foreign and Security Policy (JOINT Research Papers No. 3). Retrieved from https://www.jointproject.eu/2021/11/09/paper-regional-fragmenta tion-and-eu-foreign-and-security-policy-by-agnes-levallois/
Google Scholar
Lopez-Vega, H., & Ramis-Pujol, J. (2011). Connecting the Mediterranean system of innovation: A functional perspective. EuroMed Journal of Business, 6(1), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/14502191111130307
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14502191111130307
Google Scholar
Maricut, A. (2017). Different narratives, one area without internal frontiers: why EU institutions cannot agree on the refugee crisis. National Identities, 19(2), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2016.1256982
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2016.1256982
Google Scholar
Massaro, M., Dumay, J., & Bagnoli, C. (2019). Transparency and the rhetorical use of citations to Robert Yin in case study research. Meditari Accountancy Research, 27 (1), 44–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-08-2017-0202
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-08-2017-0202
Google Scholar
Matthies, H., & Torka, M. (2019). Academic Habitus and Institutional Change: Comparing Two Generations of German Scholars. Minerva, 57 (3), 345–371. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11024-019-09370-9
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09370-9
Google Scholar
Maxwell, J. A. (2009). Designing a Qualitative Study. In L. Bickman & D. J. Rog (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods (2nd ed., pp. 214–253). Los Angeles, London: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348858.n7 Mbabia, O. (2014). Structural Power Toward Weak States: France, Not China, Matters in Francophone Africa. Austral: Brazilian Journal of Strategy and International Relations, 3 (5), 11–39. https://doi.org/10.22456/2238-6912.46649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/2238-6912.46649
Google Scholar
McCourt, D. M. (2012). What’s at stake in the historical turn? Theory, practice and phronēsis in international relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 41 (1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829812445232
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829812445232
Google Scholar
McKean, D., & Szewczyk, B. M. (2021). Partners of First Resort: America, Europe, and the Future of the West. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9780815753476
Google Scholar
McMahon, R. (2017). Progress, democracy, efficiency: normative narratives in political science EU studies. National Identities, 19 (2), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.10 80/14608944.2016.1156078
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2016.1156078
Google Scholar
Melkers, J., & Kiopa, A. (2010). The Social Capital of Global Ties in Science: The Added Value of International Collaboration. Review of Policy Research, 27(4), 389–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12008
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00448.x
Google Scholar
Michel, H. (2022). La transparence dans le champ de l’eurocratie : un instrument politique au service de la bureaucratie (1992‑2022). Revue Française d’administration Publique, 1 (181), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfap.181.0169
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/rfap.181.0169
Google Scholar
Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2013). Science Diplomacy for France. Report 2013. Paris. Retrieved from https://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/science-diplomacy-for france‑2013_cle83c9d2.pdf
Google Scholar
Modan, G., & Shuman, A. (2011). Positioning the interviewer: Strategic uses of embedded orientation in interview narratives. Language in Society, 40, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404510000850
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404510000850
Google Scholar
Moghadam-Saman, S. (2021). Intersectoral Engagements of Doctoral Candidates: Regime Discrepancy between Academic Territories. Higher Education Governance & Policy, 2 (2), 82–97. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/hegp/ issue/67725/983601
Google Scholar
Mogherini, F. (2016). The Mediterranean and the Global Strategy (MEDAC Pub lications in Mediterranean IR and Diplomacy). Retrieved from https://www. um.edu.mt/library/oar/bitstream/123456789/46546/1/The_Mediterranean_and_ the_global_strategy_2016.pdf
Google Scholar
Motadel, D. (2021). Globaliser l’Europe. Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 76(4), 645–667. https://doi.org/10.1017/ahss.2022.3
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ahss.2022.3
Google Scholar
Mula, J., Rodríguez, C. L., Domingo Segovia, J., & Cruz-González, C. (2021). Early Career Researchers’ Identity: A Qualitative Review. Higher Education Quarterly, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12348
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12348
Google Scholar
Murakami, Y. (2019). Knowledge Acquisition Through Personal Networks: Influences of Geographical Distance and Tie Strength. In Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Knowledge Management, ECKM 2019 (pp. 764–772). Kidmo re End: Academic Conferences International Limited. https://doi.org/10.34190/ KM.19.062
Google Scholar
Neumann, I. B. (2002). Returning Practice to the Linguistic Turn: The Case of Diplomacy. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 31 (3), 627–651. https://doi. org/10.1177/03058298020310031201
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310031201
Google Scholar
Novak, S. (2014). Single Representative, Single Voice: Magical Thinking and the Representation of the EU on the World Stage. Global Policy, 5 (s1), 68–75. https:// doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12147
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12147
Google Scholar
PARISS Collective. (2020). The Art of Writing Social Sciences: Disrupting the Current Politics of Style. Political Anthropological Research on International Social Sciences, 1 (1), 9–38. https://doi.org/10.1163/25903276-bja10008
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/25903276-bja10008
Google Scholar
Perchoc, P. (2016). The European Neighbourhood Policy. In-Depth Analysis (Vol. PE 595.865). European Parliament, Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services. https://doi.org/10.2861/97957
Google Scholar
Perret, S. (2025). Violent Ends for Violent Devices? Non-Knowledge and the ‘Unreflexive’ Practices of EU’s Border Security Design. Geopolitics, 30(3), 1125–1149. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2024.2368626
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2024.2368626
Google Scholar
Poopuu, B., & van den Berg, K. (2021). Becoming Fluent in Fieldwork: (Un)learning What Is Good/Ethical/Responsible Fieldwork. Political Anthropological Research on International Social Sciences, 2 (2), 236–260. https://doi.org/10.1163/25903276 bja10028
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/25903276-bja10028
Google Scholar
Powell, J. J. W., & Baker, D. P. (2021). Lone Genius or Swarm Intelligence? Myths about Germany’s Sponsorship of Research Institutes. International Higher Education , (107), 30–31. Retrieved from https://www.internationalhighereducation. net/de/handbuch/gliederung/?articleID=3254#/Beitragsdetailansicht/860/3254/ Lone-Genius-or-Swarm-Intelligence%3F-Myths-about-Germany’s-Sponsorship of‑Research‑Institutes
Google Scholar
Renard, T. (2016). Partnerships for effective multilateralism? Assessing the compatibility between EU bilateralism, (inter-)regionalism and multilateralism. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 29 (1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2 015.1060691
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2015.1060691
Google Scholar
Richmond, O. P., Kappler, S., & Björkdahl, A. (2015). The ‘Field’ in the Age of Intervention: Power, Legitimacy, and Authority Versus the ‘Local.’ Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44 (1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829815594871
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829815594871
Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Navarro, A., & Brito, R. (2018). Technological research in the EU is less efficient than the world average. EU research policy risks Europeans’ future. Journal of Informetrics, 12 (3), 718–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.06.009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.06.009
Google Scholar
Saideman, S. (2002). Conclusion: Thinking Theoretically about Identity and Foreign Policy. In S. Telhami & M. Barnett (Eds.), Identity and Foreign Policy in the Middle East (pp. 169–200). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Google Scholar
Salmons, J. E. (2015). Doing Qualitative Research Online. Los Angeles: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473921955.n11
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473921955
Google Scholar
Schögler, R., & König, T. (2017). Thematic Research Funding in the European Union: What is Expected from Social Scientific Knowledge-making? Serendipities. Journal for the Sociology and History of the Social Sciences, 2 (1), 107–130. https:// doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1067203
Google Scholar
Schönbauer, S. M. (2021). A Passion For Science: Addressing the Role of Emotions in Identities of Biologists. In K. Kastenhofer & S. Molyneux-Hodgson (Eds.), Community and Identity in Contemporary Technosciences (pp. 283–301). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61728-8
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61728-8_14
Google Scholar
Šime, Z. (2021). European Union Science Diplomacy in the Southern Neighbourhood: Mapping the Field and Plurality of Resilience-Builders (EU Diplomacy Paper No. 8). Bruges: College of Europe. Retrieved from https://www.coleurope. eu/study/eu-international-relations-and-diplomacy-studies/research-publications/ eu-diplomacy-papers .
Google Scholar
Šime, Z. (2023a). Morocco and Tunisia on the Shores of Mare Nostrum: Positive Differentiation Across the Mediterranean and Segmentation in the EU Research Policy. Studia Europejskie – Studies in European Affairs , 27(3), 179–202. https:// doi.org/10.33067/SE.3.2023.10 .
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33067/SE.3.2023.10
Google Scholar
Šime, Z. (2023b). The EU and Its Southern Neighbourhood Policy: Resilience in the Era of Science Diplomacy. Nordicum-Mediterraneum, 18 (1), 1–31. https://nome. unak.is/wordpress/volume-18-no-1-2023/article-double-blind-peer-review-volume -18-no-1-2023/the-eu-and-its-southern-neighborhood-policy-resilience-in-the-era of-science-diplomacy/ .
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33112/nm.18.1.4
Google Scholar
Šime, Z. (2024a). European Science Diplomacy in the Southern Neighbourhood: Insights from Morocco and Tunisia. Politologija, 116(4), 8–58. https://doi. org/10.15388/Polit.2024.116.1 .
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/Polit.2024.116.1
Google Scholar
Šime, Z. (2024b). Project Archetypes of the European Research Area: Exploring the Occasional Engagement Patterns of the European Southern Neighbourhood. Latin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51799/2763-8685v4n1008
Google Scholar
American Journal of European Studies , 4(1), 210–257. https://doi.org/10.51799/2763‑8685v4n1008.
Google Scholar
Šime, Z. (2024c). Unravelling the Southern Neighbourhood Dynamics of the European Research Area: Tailored Positive External Differentiation and Segmentation. Studia Europaea Gnesnensia , 26, 85–107. https://doi.org/10.14746/seg.2024.26.4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/seg.2024.26.4
Google Scholar
Šime, Z. (2026). The EU Science Diplomacy Towards the Southern Neighbourhood: Reappraising the EU Structural Diplomacy. Norwegian Research Information Repository . https://nva.sikt.no/registration/019bb23e0147-61c9c8d2-c1d4-406b8555‑b9dd99ad6143 .
Google Scholar
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104 , 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jbusres.2019.07.039
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Google Scholar
Sørensen, K. H. (2021). STS as a Lens to Study Disciplines and Interdisciplinarity: A Comment on Sharon Traweek’s “I Prefer the Map.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society , 88–96. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2021.857
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2021.857
Google Scholar
Sørensen, K. H., & Traweek, S. (2022). Questing Excellence in Academia: A Tale of Two Universities. Routledge Studies in Science, Technology and Society. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429290633
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429290633
Google Scholar
Strydom, S. (2021). The Digital Scholar as Author: Choices in disseminating scholarly work. In W. Van Petegem, J. Bosman, M. De Klerk, & S. Strydom (Eds.), Evolving as a Digital Scholar: Teaching and Researching in a Digital World (pp. 33–52). Leuven: Leuven University Press. https://doi.org/10.11116/9789461663900
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv20zbkk0.6
Google Scholar
Sursock, A. (2021). European Higher Education: Looking Back, Looking Forward. International Higher Education , (107), 24–25. Retrieved from https://www.inter nationalhighereducation.net/en/handbuch/gliederung/?articleID=3251#/Beitrag sdetailansicht/860/3251
Google Scholar
Tampakis, K. (2016). The Science of Practice and the Practice of Science: Pierre Bourdieu and the History of Science. Sociology Compass, 10 (9), 813–822. https:// doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12402
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12402
Google Scholar
Teichler, U. (2021). Are Academics Driven by Managerialism? Governance and the Changing Role of Academics on the Way Towards a Knowledge Society. Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia, 46 , 13–26. https://doi.org/10.15388/ACTPAED.2021.46.1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/ActPaed.2021.46.1
Google Scholar
The Royal Society. (2025). Science Diplomacy in an Era of Disruption . https://royal society.org/about-us/what-we-do/international/science-diplomacy/
Google Scholar
Ulnicane, I. (2015). Why do international research collaborations last? Virtuous circle of feedback loops, continuity and renewal. Science and Public Policy, 42(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scu060
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scu060
Google Scholar
Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2010). Performance Management in the Public Sector. New York: Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203030806
Google Scholar
Wacquant, L. J. D. (2002). The Sociological Life of Pierre Bourdieu. International Sociology, 17 (4), 549–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580902017004005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580902017004005
Google Scholar
Wagner, A.‑C. (2018). Champ. In Les 100 mots de la sociologie (2nd ed., p. 50). Paris: Presses universitaires de France. Retrieved from https://journals.openedition.org/ sociologie/3206
Google Scholar
Wanzenböck, I., Lata, R., & Ince, D. (2020). Proposal success in horizon 2020: A study of the influence of consortium characteristics. Quantitative Science Studies, 1 (3), 1136–1158. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00067
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00067
Google Scholar
Wirtén, E. H. (2015). Making Marie Curie: Intellectual Property & Celebrity Culture in an Age of Information. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226235981.001.0001
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226235981.001.0001
Google Scholar
Wortham, S., Mortimer, K., Lee, K., Allard, E., & White, K. D. (2011). Interviews as interactional data. Language in Society, 40 , 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0047404510000874
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404510000874
Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. (2009). How to Do Better Case Studies. In L. Bickman & D. J. Rog (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods (2nd ed., pp. 254–282). Los Angeles, London: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348858
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348858.n8
Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.31261/spus.23205
English
Język Polski