Choice, workplace flexibility and care needs in the digital age: a comparison between the German and Italian legal approaches
Abstract
The aim of this paper is twofold: to highlight the potential and limitations of the new right to request flexible working arrangements for caring purposes, as established in Directive no. 2019/1158, and to consider, through an overview of the EU law, whether and to what extent this right can be interpreted in a manner that truly favours the interests of workers with care-related responsibilities over those of employers. The paper analyses some examples of approaches taken regarding the implementation of the right to request flexible working arrangements in two different jurisdictions, such as Germany and Italy, and compares the transposing choices made in the two different legal contexts. The author argues, also in light of this investigation, that the potential of the duty to provide flexible working arrangements could be, to a certain
extent, enhanced through the application of the prohibition of indirect discrimination, from which a sort of duty of accommodation could be inferred. The duty to provide flexible working arrangements could constitute the procedural tool to apply and enhance the proportionality test and reasonable accommodation.
Keywords
Working time; flexible working arrangements; care needs; Italy; Germany
References
Aimo, M., D. Izzi: Disability and workers’ well-being in collective agreements: practices and potential. In: T. Treu, G. Casale (eds): Transformations of Work: Challenges for the National of Labour Law and Social Security. XXII World Congress of the International Society for Labour and Social Security Law, Wolters Kluwer 2019, p. 41.
Alessi, C.: Flessibilità del lavoro e potere organizzativo. Giappichelli 2012, p. 69.
Alessi, C., O. Bonardi, L. Calafà, M. D’Onghia: Per una trasposizione responsabile della dir. 2019/1158/UE relativa all’equilibrio tra attività professionale e vita familiare per i genitori e i prestatori di assistenza. “Rivista giuridica del lavoro” 2022, p. 111.
Alessi, C.: La flessibilità del lavoro per la conciliazione nella direttiva 2019/1158/UE e nel d.lgs. 30 giugno 2022 n. 105. “Quaderno di DLM n. 14 dal titolo” ‘Diritto di conciliazione. Prospettive e limiti della trasposizione della dir. 2019/1158/UE’. Editoriale scientifica 2023.
Alexy, R.: Constitutional Rights, Balancing, and Rationality. “Ratio Juris” 2003, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 131–40.
Bano, F.: “Tempo scelto” e diritto del lavoro: definizioni e problemi. In: B. Veneziani, V. Bavaro (eds): Le dimensioni giuridiche dei tempi di lavoro. Cacucci 2009, p. 237.
Barbera, M., S. Borelli: Principio di uguaglianza e divieti di discriminazione. “WP CSDLE “Massimo D’Antona”. IT – 451/2022”.
Bayreuther, F.: Arbeitszeiterfassung auf richterrechtlicher Basis. “Neue Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht” 2023, pp. 6–7.
Benkert, D.: Pflicht zur Arbeitszeiterfassung – was bedeutet dies für Arbeitgeber? “Neue Juristische Wochenschrift-Spezial” 2023, pp. 50–51.
Bonardi, O.: Il diritto di assistere. L’implementazione nazionale delle previsioni a favore dei caregivers della direttiva 2019/1158 in materia di conciliazione. In: Quaderno di DLM n. 14, cit.
Brose, W.: Die Reform des PflegeZG. Eine halbherzige Umsetzung der Vereinbarkeitsrichtlinie 2019/1158/EU. “ZESAR” 2023, p. 313.
Busby, N.: A Right to Care? Unpaid Care Work in European Employment Law. Oxford University Press 2011, p. 182.
Cairoli, S.: Tempi e luoghi di lavoro nell’era del capitalismo cognitivo e dell’impresa digitale. Jovene 2020.
Calvellini, G.: La funzione del part-time: tempi della persona e vincoli di sistema. Esi 2020.
Calvellini, G.: Work–life balance e diritto antidiscriminatorio, oggi. In: G. Calvellini, A. Loffredo (eds): Il tempo di lavoro tra scelta e imposizione. Editoriale scientifica 2023, p. 73.
Caracciolo di Torella, E.: An emerging right to care in the EU: a “New Start to Support Work–Life Balance for Parents and Carers”. ERA Forum 2017.
Caracciolo di Torella, E., M. Masselot: Caring Responsibilities in European Law and Policy – Who Cares? Abingdon 2020.
Casillo, R.: Permessi e agevolazioni per i lavoratori caregivers familiari (art. 3, comma 1, lett. B,d.lgs. n. 105/2022). In: D. Garofalo, M. Tiraboschi, A. Filì,
A. Trojsi (eds): Trasparenza e attività di cura nei contratti di lavoro. Commentario ai decreti legislativi n. 104 e n. 105 del 2022, p. 568.
Cester, C.: Lavoro e tempo libero nell’esperienza giuridica. “Quaderni di diritto del lavoro e delle relazioni industriali” 1995, vol. 17, p. 10.
Chieregato, C.: A Work–Life Balance for All? Assessing the Inclusiveness of EU Directive 2019/1158. “International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations” 2020, p. 59.
Collins, H.: Justices for Foxes: Fundamental Rights and Justification of Indirect Discrimination. In: H. Collins, T. Khaitan (eds): Foundations of Indirect Discrimination Law. Hart Publishing 2018, p. 249.
Conaghan, J.: The Family-friendly Workplace in Labour Law Discourse: Some Reflections on London Underground Ltd v Edwards. In: H. Collins, P. Davies, R. Rideout (eds): Legal Regulation of the Employment Relation. Oxford University Press 2001, p. 161. Contouris, N.: Defining and Regulating Work Relations for the Future of Work. International Labour Organisation 2019.
Dagnino, E.: Dalla fisica all’algoritmo: una prospettiva di analisi giuslavoristica. Adapt, University Press 2019.
De Luca Tamajo, R.: Il tempo di lavoro e (il rapporto individuale di lavoro), in A.a.V.v., Il tempo dilavoro. Atti delle giornate di studio di diritto del lavoro AIDLaSS. Giuffré 1987, p. 9.
De Simone, G.: Discriminazione. In: M. Novella, P. Tullini (eds): Lavoro digitale. Giappichelli 2022, p. 127.
Del Punta, R.: Leggendo “The Idea of Justice”, di Amartya Sen. “Giornale di diritto del lavoro e di relazioni industriali” 138/2013, p. 197.
Del Punta, R.: Labour Law and the Capability Approach. “Int. Journal Comp. Lab. Law and Industrial Relations” 2016, p. 383.
European Economic and Social Committee: Teleworking and gender equality – conditions so that teleworking does not exacerbate the unequal distribution of unpaid care and domestic work between women and men and for it to be an engine for promoting gender equality, 2021.
Ferrante, V.: Lavoro a tempo parziale. “Enciclopedia giuridica Treccani” 2008, p. 1.
Fredman, S.: Discrimination Law. Oxford University Press 2012.
Fredman, S.: Women at Work: the Broken Promise of Flexicurity. “Industrial Law Journal” 2004, p. 299.
Genin, E.: Proposal for a theoretical framework for the analysis of time porosity. “Int. Journal Comp. Lab. Law and Industrial Relations” 2016, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 280–300.
Graue, B.: Auswirkungen der Richtlinie 2019/1158/EU zur Vereinbarkeit von Beruf und Privatleben für Eltern und pflegende Angehörige auf das deutsche Arbeitsrecht. “ZESAR” 2020, pp. 62–71.
Hiessl, C.: Caring for Balance? Legal Approaches to those who Struggle to Juggle Work and Adult Care. “International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations” 2020, p. 107 (111).
Ichino, P.: Le conseguenze dell’innovazione tecnologica sul diritto del lavoro. “Rivista italiana di diritto del lavoro” 2017, vol. 4, p. 525.
Inapp plus report: Lavoro e formazione: L’Italia di fronte alle sfide del futuro. November 2022.
International Labour Office: Working Time and Work-Life Balance Around The World. 2022.
James, G.: The Work and Families Act 2006: Legislation to Improve Choice and flexibility? “Industrial Law Journal” 2006, pp. 272–278.
Janda, C., H. Hermann: Die assoziierte Benachteiligung im Arbeitsrecht. “ZESAR” 2023, vol. 11–12, p. 455.
Klein, T.: Flexible Arbeitsregelungen zur Förderung der Vereinbarkeit von Familien und Berufsleben und die Grenzen des Arbeitszeitrechts. “Neue Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht” 2021, p. 474.
Leccese, V.: La misurazione dell’orario di lavoro e le sue sfide. “Labour & Law Issues” 2022.
Leccese, V.: Lavoro agile e misurazione della durata dell’orario per finalità di tutela della salute, nota a Cge 14 maggio 2019 – C-55/18. “Rivista giuridica del lavoro” 2020, p. 428.
Malzani, F.: Il lavoro agile tra opportunità e nuovi rischi per il lavoratore. “Diritti Lavori Mercati” 2018, p. 21.
Militello, M.: Conciliare vita e lavoro. Strategie e tecniche di regolazione. Giappichelli 2021.
Mitchell, G.: A Right to Care: Putting Care Ethics at the Heart of UK Reconciliation Legislation. “Ind. Law Journal” 2020, vol. 49, no. 2, p. 199.
Occhino, A. (ed.): Il lavoro e i suoi luoghi. Giuffré 2018.
Perulli, A., V. Speziale: Dieci tesi sul diritto del lavoro. Il Mulino 2022.
Perulli, A., T. Treu: “In tutte le sue forme ed applicazioni”. Per un nuovo Statuto del lavoro. Giappichelli 2022.
Peruzzi, M.: Sicurezza e agilità: quale tutela per lo smart worker? “Diritto della sicurezza sul lavoro” 2017, p. 26.
Picker, C.: Rechtsanspruch auf Homeoffice? “Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht” 2019, p. 269.
Santagata de Castro, R.: Discriminazione diretta e indiretta. Una distinzione da ripensare? “Lavoro e diritto” 2022, p. 509.
Saraceno, C.: Childcare needs and childcare policies: A multidimensional issue. “Current Sociology” 2011, p. 78.
Saraceno, C.: Ancora 50 anni per l’uguaglianza alle donne solo il 77% dei diritti. “La stampa” 3 March 2023, p. 25.
Scarponi, S.: ‘Work life balance’ fra diritto Ue e diritto interno. “WP C.S.D.L.E. “Massimo D’Antona”. INT –156/2021”.
Sen, A.: Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press 1999.
Senatori, I., C. Spinelli: (Re-)Regulating Remote Work in the Post-pandemic scenario: Lessons from the Italian experience. “Italian Labour Law e-Journal” 2021, vol. 14, Issue 1.
Spinelli, C.: Disability, Reasonable Accommodation and Smart Working: a virtuous matching? In: T. Treu, G. Casale (eds): Transformations of work: challenges for the national systems of labour law and social security. Giappichelli 2018.
Spinelli, C.: Tecnologie digitali e lavoro agile. Cacucci 2018.
Sullivan, C.: Gender equality, work-life balance and the “right to disconnect”. “International Labour Review” 2022.
Supiot, A.: Alla ricerca della concordanza dei tempi (le disavventure europee del ”tempo di lavoro”). “Lavoro e diritto” 1997, p. 15.
Supiot, A.: Transformation of labour and future of labour law in Europe, Final Report 1998. European Union.
Tiraboschi, M.: Il lavoro agile tra legge e contrattazione collettiva: la tortuosa via italiana verso la modernizzazione del diritto del lavoro. “WP CSDLE “Massimo D’Antona”. IT – 335/2017”.
Treu, T.: Introduzione. In: A. Occhino (ed.): Il lavoro e i suoi luoghi. Vita e Pensiero 2018, XIII.
Tufo, M.: Il lavoro digitale a distanza. Editoriale scientifica 2021.
Ulber, D.: Entscheidungsanmerkung: Aufzeichnung der Arbeitszeit als neue Arbeitgeberpflicht. “Neue Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht” 2023, pp. 7–8.
Valente, R.: Forme atipiche di lavoro: una nuova frontiera? “Rivista giuridica del lavoro” 2021, p. 119.
Vettor, A.: La durata della prestazione lavorativa tra tempo di lavoro e tempo di non lavoro. “Labour & Law Issues” 2019, p. 26.
Vettor, A.: Lavoro e non lavoro nella transizione digitale: note per una “contabilità” rinnovata del tempo lavorativo. “Diritti Lavori Mercati” 2020, p. 172.
Waddington, L.: Reasonable Accommodation – Time to Extend the Duty to Accommodate Beyond Disability? “NJCM-Bulletin” 2011, p. 186.
Waddington, L., M. Bell: The right to request flexible working arrangements under the Work–Life Balance Directive – A comparative perspective. “European Labour Law Journal” 2021.
Wahl, T.: ArbZG-Anpassung: Arbeitszeitgesetz soll EU-Vorgaben erfüllen. “Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht” 2018, p. 72.
Weiss, M.: Challenges for Labour Law and Industrial Relationship. In: M. Weiss (ed.): A Legal Scholar Without Borders. Adapt 2023, p. 69.
Weldon-Johns, M.: EU work-family policies revisited: Finally challenging caring roles? “European Labour Law Journal” 2021, p. 310 (317).
Weske, H.: Frauen in der Arbeitswelt 4.0: Die digitale Revolution gleichberechtigt mitgestalten. “Neue Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht” 2019, p. 13.
Zagrebelsky, G.: Il diritto mite. Legge, diritti, giustizia. Einaudi 1997.
Zito, M.: Lavoro agile e durata dell’orario di lavoro. “Diritti Lavori Mercati” 2020, p. 4.
Zoppoli, A.: Prospettiva rimediale, fattispecie e sistema nel diritto del lavoro. Editoriale Scientifica 2022, p. 39.
Zoppoli, L.: I riders tra fattispecie e disciplina: dopo la sentenza della Cassazione n. 1663/2020. “Massimario della Giurisprudenza del lavoro” 2020, p. 265.
Uniwersytet Kampanii „Luigi Vanvitelli” Italy
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2334-6341
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
