The common law approaches to identity theft: Implications for Hungarian law reform


Abstract

The incidence of identity theft is escalating, especially in international contexts. Owing to the advancement of information technology, crimes associated with this issue are borderless and can manifest anywhere. The objective of this study is to scrutinize the regulatory frameworks concerning identity theft in foreign jurisdictions. The essay not only considers theoretical aspects but also practical and criminological dimensions of the issue in question. As an outcome of the examination of these regulatory models, it is hoped that proposals de lege ferenda (‘regarding future law’) can be articulated for the Hungarian legislature.
The initial segment of the article grapples with defining the phenomenon. There is no universally accepted definition of identity theft. Various terms are employed in foreign literature to describe the very phenomenon, including “identity theft” and “identity fraud.” Subsequent to the conceptual introduction, the study surveys the potential forms of identity theft.
In the subsequent sections of the article, the regulatory models of identity theft in common law jurisdictions are analyzed. The regulatory frameworks of the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia are subject to examination.
In the concluding section of the study, recommendations for future legislation (de lege ferenda) are proposed.


Keywords

identity theft; cybercrime; criminal law; jurisprudence

Alisdair A. G.: Cybercrime. New York 2015.

Biegelman M. T.: Identity theft handbook: Detection, prevention and security. New Jersey 2009.

Borges G., Schwenk J., Stuckenberg C., Wegener C.: Identitätsdiebstahl und identitätsmissbrauch im Internet. Rechtliche und technische Aspekte. Heidelberg–Dordrecht–London–New York 2011.

Borges G. et al.: Identity theft and fraud legislation in Canada. “Canadian Law Journal” 2011, vol. 4, no. 120, pp. 341–343

Busch C.: Biometrie und Identitätsdiebstahl. “Datenschutz und Datensicherheit – DuD” 2009, no. 5, pp. 317–317.

Eszteri D., Máté I. Z.: Identitáslopás a virtuális világban. “Belügyi Szemle” 2017, no. 3, pp. 79–107.

Farina K. A.: entry Cyber Crime: Identity Theft. In: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Eds. N. J. Smelser, P. B. Baltes, 2015, pp. 633–637.

Gál I. L.: Új biztonságpolitikai kihívás a XXI. században: a terrorizmus finanszírozása. “Szakmai Szemle: A katonai Nemzetbiztonsági Szolgálat Tudományos-Szakmai Folyóirata” 2012, no. 1, pp. 5–15.

Haig Z.: Az információs hadviselés kialakulása, katonai értelmezése. “Hadtudomány, a Magyar Hadtudományi Társaság Folyóirata” 2011, nos. 1–2, pp. 12–28.

Hámori B.: Bizalom, jóhírnév és identitás az elektronikus piacokon. “Közgazdasági Szemle” 2004, no. 9, pp. 832–848.

Holm E.: The darknet: New passageway to identity theft. “International Journal of Information Security and Cybercrime” 2017, no. 6(1), pp. 41–50.

Kahn C. M., Roberds W.: Credit and identity theft “Journal of Monetary Economics” 2008, no. 55, pp. 251–264.

Kőhalmi L.: A gazdasági és a szervezett bűnözés. In: Bevezetés a bűnügyi tudományokba. Ed. E. Váradi. Miskolc 2007, pp. 141–155.

Lawson P., Lawford J.: Identity theft: The need for better consumer protection. Public Interest Advocacy Centre 2003.

Manap N. A., Rahim A. A., Taji H.: Cyberspace identity theft: The conceptual framework. “Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences” 2015, no. 4, pp. 595–605.

Samaha J.: Criminal law. Belmont 2008.

Savirimuthu A., Savirimuthu J.: Identity theft and systems theory: The fraud act 2006 in perspective. “SCRIPTed: Journal of Law, Technology and Society” 2007, no. 4(4), pp. 436–461.

Schwartau W.: Information warfare. Kindle e-book edition. New York 2010.

Sorbán K.: Az informatikai bűncselekmények elleni fellépés nemzetközi dimenziói “Themis” 2015, no. 1, pp. 343–375.

Tóth D.: “Személyiséglopás az interneten.” Büntetőjogi Szemle 2020, no. 1, pp. 113–119.

Winterdyk J., Thompson N.: Identity theft: Another thing to worry about. “Law Now” 2008, no. 4, pp. 30–34.

Download

Published : 2023-03-26


TóthD., & GátiB. (2023). The common law approaches to identity theft: Implications for Hungarian law reform. Problemy Prawa Karnego, 7(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.31261/PPK.2023.07.01.06

Dávid Tóth  toth.david@ajk.pte.hu
University of Pécs  Hungary
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2179-7587
Balázs Gáti 
, University of Pécs  Hungary
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8801-6585




Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.

1. License

The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.

2. Author’s Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.

If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".

ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).

3. User Rights

Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.

4. Co-Authorship

If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.

I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.