Amoo, Olukunle Oladipupo, Atadoga, Akoh , Abrahams , Temitayo Oluwaseun, Farayola, Oluwatoyin Ajoke, Osasona, Femi and Ayinla, Benjamin Samson. " The legal landscape of cybercrime: A review of contemporary issues in the criminal justice system.” World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, vol. 21, no. 2 (2011): 205-217.
Google Scholar
Tosza, Stanislaw, “ Gathering Electronic Evidence for Administrative Investigations. Exploring an Under-the-Radar Area“, eucrim, no. 0 (2024): 1-19.
Google Scholar
Berkeley Protocol on Digital Open Source Investigations. New York and Geneva: the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) and the Human Rights Center at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, 2022. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/2024-01/OHCHR_BerkeleyProtocol.pdf
Google Scholar
Bernard, Janja. “Problematika pregona računalniškega kriminala in uporabe digitalnih dokazov z vidika državnega tožilstva,” In Digitalna forenzika v kazenskih postopkih, edited by Liljana Selinšek, 65-86. Ljubljana: GV Založba, 2008.
Google Scholar
Council of Europe, “Explanatory Report to the Convention on Cybercrime.” European Treaty Series – No. 185. November 23, 2001. https://rm.coe.int/16800cce5b
Google Scholar
Currie, Robert J. “ Cross-Border Evidence Gathering in Transnational Criminal Investigation: Is the Microsoft Ireland Case the ‘Next Frontier’?”. Canadian Yearbook of international Law, vol. 54 (2017): 63-97.
Google Scholar
White, Elizabeth. “Closing cases with open-source: Facilitating the use of user -generated open-source evidence in international criminal investigations through the creation of a standing investigative mechanism,” Leiden Journal of International Law, vol. 37, no. 1 (2024): 228-250, accessed April 19, 2024. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/leiden-journal-of-internationallaw/article/closing-cases-with-opensource-facilitating-the-use-of-usergenerated-opensource-evidence-in-international-criminal-investigations-throughthe-creation-of-a-standing-investigative.
Google Scholar
Erbežnik, Anže, “ A new EU system on cross-border gathering of e-evidence - analysis and open questions,” Digitas, no. 98 (2023): 47-72.
Google Scholar
Eurojust, “ Trans-Border Access to Stored Computer Data under Article 32 of the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime and Extraterritorial Powers.” January 23, 2024. https://www.eurojust.europa.eu/sites/default/files/assets/trans-borderaccess-to-stored-computer-data-under-article-32-of-the-budapest-convention-on-cybercrime-and-extraterritorial-powers-23-01-2024.pdf
Google Scholar
European Court of Human Rights, “Guide on Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights”. Accessed April 9, 2024. https://ks.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr-ks/guide_art_8_eng
Google Scholar
Evan Norris and Morgan J Cohen, “How US Authorities Obtain Foreign Evidence in Cross-Border Investigations,” Global Investigations Review, (2023). Accessed May 28, 2024, https://globalinvestigationsreview.com/review/the-investigations-review-of-the-americas/2021/article/how-us-authoritiesobtain-foreign-evidence-in-cross-border-investigations
Google Scholar
Gonzales, Alberto R., Schofield, Regina B. and Hagy, David W. “Digital Evidence in the Courtroom: A Guide for Law Enforcement and Prosecutors.” Washington: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, 2007. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/211314.pdf
Google Scholar
Linyz, Adjoa. “ The Attorney–Client Privilege and Discovery of Electronically-Stored Information.” Duke Law & Technology Review, vol. 10, no. 1 (2011): 1-18.
Google Scholar
Antonis, Michalas and Kassaye Yitbarek, Yigzaw, “ LocLess: Do you Really Care Where Your Cloud Files Are?.” IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science, Luxembourg: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (2016): 515-520.
Google Scholar
NIST, “Digital Evidence Preservation. Considerations for Evidence Handlers,” September 2022, https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2022/NIST.IR.8387.pdf.
Google Scholar
Norris, Evand and Cohen, Morgan J. “How US Authorities Obtain Foreign Evidence in Cross-Border Investigations.” New Global Investigations Review, (2020). Accessed June 27, 2024. https://globalinvestigationsreview.com/review/the-investigations-review-of-the-americas/2021/article/how-us-authoritiesobtain-foreign-evidence-in-cross-border-investigations.
Google Scholar
Panzavolta, Michele, Maes, Elise and Anna Mosna. “ Streamlining the exclusion of illegally obtained evidence in criminal justice.” Accessed April 25, 2024. https://www.law.kuleuven.be/linc/english/research/Panzavolta_Streamlining_The_Exclusion_Of_Illegally_Obtained_Evidence_In_Criminal_Justice.
Google Scholar
Policijski sistem Face Trace sicer temelji na biometrični obdelavi osebnih podatkov, a ne omogoča identifikacije. Informacijski pooblaščenec, 2021. https://www.ip-rs.si/novice/policijski-sistem-face-trace-sicer-temelji-na-biometrični-obdelavi-osebnih-podatkov-a-ne-omogoča-identifikacije
Google Scholar
Selinšek, Liljana. “Digitalna forenzika v kazenskih postopkih.” In Digitalna forenzika v kazenskih postopkih, edited by Liljana Selinšek, 13-64. Ljubljana: GV Založba, 2008.
Google Scholar
Sieber, Ulrich, and Neubert, Carl-Wendelin. “Transnational Criminal Investigations in Cyberspace: Challenges to National Sovereignty”. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online, vol. 20, no.1 (2017): 239-321.
Google Scholar
Sachoulidou, Athina, “Cross-border access to electronic evidence in criminal matters: The new EU legislation and the consolidation of a paradigm shift in the area of ‘judicial’ cooperation,” New Journal of European Criminal Law, vol. 0, no. 2 (2023): 216-222.
Google Scholar
Šepec, Miha. Kibernetski kriminal, kazniva dejanja in kazenskopravna analiza. Maribor: Univerzitetna založba Univerze v Mariboru, 2018.
Google Scholar
Šugman Stubbs, Katja, Gorkič, Primož. Evropski nalog za prijetje in predajo : teoretični in praktični vidiki. Ljubljana: GV Založba, 2010.
Google Scholar
Unlawful evidence in Europe’s courts: principles, practice and remedies. Fair Trials, 2021, Accessed May 25, 2024 https://www.fairtrials.org/app/uploads/2021/11/DREP-report.pdf
Google Scholar
Legal Acts
Google Scholar
Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act (The CLOUD Act), Pub. L. 115-141, div. V, Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1213
Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 1950. “Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.” Council of Europe Treaty Series 005. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Google Scholar
Council of Europe. Convention on Cybercrime. Budapest, 23 November 2001. European Treaty Series - No. 185.
Google Scholar
Directive (EU) 2023/1544 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2023 laying down harmonised rules on the designation of designated establishments and the appointment of legal representatives for the purpose of gathering electronic evidence in criminal proceedings
Google Scholar
Directive 2013/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 August 2013 on attacks against information systems and replacing Council Framework Decision 2005/222/JHA
Google Scholar
Directive 2014/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters
Google Scholar
Regulation (EU) 2023/1543 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2023 on European Production Orders and European Preservation Orders for electronic evidence in criminal proceedings and for the execution of custodial sentences following criminal proceedings
Google Scholar
Zakon o kazenskem postopku (Uradni list RS, št. 176/21 – uradno prečiščeno besedilo in 96/22 – odl. US
Google Scholar
Case law
Google Scholar
Kruglov and others v. Russia. Application No. 11264/04. ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0204JUD001126404
Google Scholar
Visy v. Slovakia. Application No. 70288/13. ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1016JUD007028813
Google Scholar
Ivashchenko v. Russia. Application No. 61064/10. ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0213JUD006106410
Google Scholar
Bykov v. Russia, Application No. 4378/02. ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0310JUD000437802
Google Scholar
Permanent Court of International Justice. Affaire Du »Lotus« ... = The Case of the S.S. »Lotus.«. Leyde :Société d'éditions A.W. Sijthoff, 1927.
Google Scholar
Kolesnichenko v. Russia. Application No. 1956/04. ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0409JUD001985604
Google Scholar
Internet sources
Google Scholar
“Facial Recognition,” How we work, Forensics, Interpol, accesed April 26, 2024, https://www.interpol.int/en/How-we-work/Forensics/Facial-Recognition.
Google Scholar
“File format,” Dictionary, Computer Hope, accesed June 26, 2024, https://www.computerhope.com/jargon/f/file-format.htm.
Google Scholar
“open file,” Encyclopedia, PCmag, accesed April 30, 2024, https://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/open-file
Google Scholar
“Sovereignty and jurisdiction,” E4J University Module Series: Cybercrime, Module 7: International Cooperation against Cybercrime, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, accesed May 25, 2024, https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/cybercrime/module-7/key-issues/sovereignty-and-jurisdiction.html#:~:text=Cybercrime%20jurisdiction%20is%20established%20by,interests%20and%20security%20of%20the.
Google Scholar
Facebook, “Information for law enforcement,” Help Center, accesed April 30, 2024, https://www.facebook.com/help/494561080557017.
Google Scholar
Justia. “ The Foundations of the Exclusionary Rule.” Accessed May 25, 2024.
Google Scholar
https://law.justia.com/constitution/us/amendment-04/34-the-foundations-of-the-exclusionary-rule.html
Google Scholar
Rouse, Margaret. “File,” Technopedia, accessed June 26, 2024, https://www.techopedia.com/definition/7199/file
Google Scholar