Anker Elisabeth S., Felski Rita, eds., 2017: Critique and Postcritique. Duke University Press, Durham–London.
Google Scholar
Beckwith Sarah, 2017: Reading for Our Lives. PMLA, vol. 132, issue 2, s. 331–336. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2017.132.2.331.
Google Scholar
Best Stephen, 2017: „La foi postcritique”, on Second Thought. PMLA, vol. 132, issue 2, s. 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2017.132.2.337.
Google Scholar
Branch Lori, 2016: Postcritical and Postsecular: The Horizon of Belief. „Religion & Literature”, vol. 48, no. 2, s. 160–167. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26377486 [dostęp: 4.10.2022].
Google Scholar
Eagleton Terry, 2017: Not Just Anybody. [Rev. Rita Felski: The Limits of Critique]. „London Review of Books”, vol. 39, no. 1. https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v39/n01/terry-eagleton/not-just-anybody [dostęp: 4.10.2022].
Google Scholar
Felski Rita, 1995: Gender of Modernity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.–London.
Google Scholar
Felski Rita, 2000: Doing Time: Feminist Theory and Postmodern Culture. New York University Press, New York–London.
Google Scholar
Felski Rita, 2003: Literature after Feminism. Chicago University Press, Chicago–London.
Google Scholar
Felski Rita, 2008: Uses of Literature. Blackwell Publishing, Malden–Oxford.
Google Scholar
Felski Rita, 2015: Limits of Critique. Chicago University Press, Chicago–London.
Google Scholar
Felski Rita, 2016: Literatura w użyciu. Przeł. Joanna Borkowska et al. Wydawnictwo „Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne”, Poznań.
Google Scholar
Felski Rita, 2017a: Kontekst jest do bani. Przeł. Krzysztof Hoffmann, Weronika Szwebs. „Forum Poetyki”, nr 7 (wiosna/lato), s. 94–111.
Google Scholar
Felski Rita, 2017b: Response. PMLA, vol. 132, issue 2, s. 384–391. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2017.132.2.384.
Google Scholar
Felski Rita, 2020: Hooked. Art and Attachment. Chicago University Press, Chicago–London.
Google Scholar
Fessenden Tracy, 2016: A Hermeneutics of Resilience and Repair. „Religion & Literature”, vol. 48, no. 2, s. 167–172. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26377487 [dostęp: 4.10.2022].
Google Scholar
Friedman Susan Stanford, 2017: Both/And: Critique and Discovery in Humanities. PMLA, vol. 132, issue 2, s. 344–351. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2017.132.2.344.
Google Scholar
Fuss Diana, 2017: But What about Love? PMLA, vol. 132, issue 2, s. 352–355. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2017.132.2.352.
Google Scholar
Giusti Francesco, 2019: Passionate Affinities: A Conversation with Rita Felski. „Los Angeles Review of Books”, September 25. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/passionate-affinities-a-conversationwith-rita-felski/ [dostęp: 3.04.2022].
Google Scholar
Gustafson Sandra M., Gardner Tyler, 2016: Introduction: Possibilities Beyond Critique. „Religion & Literature”, vol. 48, no. 2, s. 156–159. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26377485 [dostęp: 4.10.2022].
Google Scholar
Jacobs Alan, 2016: Vulnerabilities and Rewards. „Religion & Literature”, vol. 48, no. 2, s. 173–179. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26377488 [dostęp: 4.10.2022].
Google Scholar
Jagoda Patrick, 2017: Critique and Critical Making. PMLA, vol. 132, issue 2, s. 356–363. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2017.132.2.356.
Google Scholar
Kurnick David, 2020: A Few Lies: Queer Theory and Our Method Melodramas. „English Literary History”, vol. 87 (2), s. 349–374. https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.2020.0011.
Google Scholar
Love Heather, 2017: „Critique Is Ordinary”. PMLA, vol. 132, issue 2, s. 364–370. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2017.132.2.364.
Google Scholar
McDermott Ryan, 2016: Conversion and Critique. „Religion & Literature”, vol. 48, no. 2, s. 179–183. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26377489 [dostęp: 5.10.2022].
Google Scholar
Mullins Matthew, 2015: Are We Postcritical? „Los Angeles Review of Books”, December 25. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/are-wepostcritical/ [dostęp: 3.04.2022].
Google Scholar
Pecora Vincent P., 2016: „Suspicion… Hermeneutics… Religion?”. „Religion & Literature”, vol. 48, no. 2, s. 183–189. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26377490 [dostęp: 5.10.2022].
Google Scholar
Robbins Bruce, 2017: Not So Well Attached. PMLA, vol. 132, issue 2, s. 371–376. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2017.132.2.371.
Google Scholar