Praca różnicy płciowej Wokół związków myśli Luce Irigaray z włoskimi ruchami feministycznymi

Katarzyna Szopa

doi:10.31261/SSP.2019.13.04

Published: 2019-06-22

Vol. 13 No. 1 (2019)

Sexuate Difference at Work. On Relations of Luce Irigaray’s Thought with Italian Feminist Movements

Katarzyna Szopa

Section: Essays and Articles

https://doi.org/10.31261/SSP.2019.13.04

Abstract

This article’s aim is an attempt at discussing the notion of reproductive work/labour pondered over by female representatives of Italian autonomism and also
eminent in Luce Irigaray’s philosophy. By pointing to the said relationship between Irigaray’s thought and Italian feminist movements, the author indicates the missing link in feminist historiography, referring feminist thought back to the origins of Marxist philosophy. Following the trail of thought of both the feminist female theoreticians and Luce Irigaray, the author proves that through regaining the significance of reproductive work/labour playing crucial role in patriarchal-capitalist economy, it is actually possible to redefine the gender distribution of labour/work based on exploitation of women in economic, social, political, and cultural dimension. Putting sexuate difference to the eponymous work would, therefore, involve intertwining those two programmes: Irigaray’s philosophy and Italian autonomism, accompanied by a political programme per se, which would transform social relations between men and women,
thereby creating new worlds and new relations.

Keywords:

sexuate difference , reproductive work , feminism , autonomism

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Szopa, K. (2019). Sexuate Difference at Work. On Relations of Luce Irigaray’s Thought with Italian Feminist Movements. Śląskie Studia Polonistyczne [Silesian Journal of Polish Studies], 13(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.31261/SSP.2019.13.04

Cited by / Share

References

Battersby Christine, 1998: The Phenomenal Woman. Feminist Metaphysics and the Patterns of Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar

Brophy Enda, 2008: Introduction. In: Giovanna Dalla Costa: The Work of Love: Unpaid Housework, Poverty and Sexual Violence at the Dawn of the 21st Century. New York: Autonomedia.
Google Scholar

Cleaver Harry, 2011: Polityczne czytanie Kapitału. [Przeł. Iwo Czyż]. Poznań: Oficyna Wydawnicza Bractwa „Trójka”.
Google Scholar

Cuninghame Patric, 2010: Włoski feminizm, operaismo i autonomia
Google Scholar

w latach 70. Walka przeciwko nieopłaconej pracy reprodukcyjnej i przemocy. „Przegląd Anarchistyczny”, nr 11.
Google Scholar

Daley Linda, 2012: Luce Irigaray’s Sexuate Economy. „Feminist Theory”, vol. 1 (13).
Google Scholar

Dalla Costa Giovanna, 2008: The Work of Love: Unpaid Housework, Poverty and Sexual Violence at the Dawn of the 21st Century. New York: Autonomedia.
Google Scholar

Dalla Costa Mariarosa, James Selma, 1975: The Power of Women and the Subversion of the Community. Bristol: The Falling Wall Press.
Google Scholar

Del Re Alisa, 1996: Women and Welfare: Where is Jocasta? In: Radical
Google Scholar

Thought in Italy: a Potential Politics. Eds. Paolo Virno, Michael Hardt. Minneapolis–London: University of Minnesota Press.
Google Scholar

Del Re Alisa, 2014: Produkcja/reprodukcja. Przeł. Sławomir Królak.
Google Scholar

W: Marks. Nowe perspektywy. Red. Krystian Szadkowski. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar

Federici Silvia, 1975: Wages against Housework. Bristol: Falling Wall Press.
Google Scholar

Federici Silvia, 2017: Kapitał a płeć. Przeł. Jakub Krzeski, Anna Piekarska. „Praktyka Teoretyczna”, nr 3 (25).
Google Scholar

Irigaray Luce, 1992: Women–Mothers, the Silent Substratum of the Social Order. In: The Irigaray Reader. Ed. Margaret Whitford. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.
Google Scholar

Irigaray Luce, 1993a: Je, tu, nous. Towards a Culture of Difference. Trans. Alison Martin. New York–London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Irigaray Luce, 1993b: Sexes and Genealogies. Trans. Gillian C. Gill. New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar

Irigaray Luce, 1994: Thinking the Difference: For a Peaceful Revolution. Trans. Karin Montin. London: The Athlone Press.
Google Scholar

Irigaray Luce, 2010: Ta płeć (jedną) płcią niebędąca. Przeł. Sławomir Królak. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Google Scholar

Irigaray Luce, 2017: To Be Born: Genesis of a New Human Being. London: Palgrave McMillan.
Google Scholar

Rowbotham Sheila, 2014: Women, Resistance and Revolution: a History of Women and Revolution in the Modern World. London–New York: Verso.
Google Scholar

Serkowska Hanna, 2002: Wokół recepcji „Ciało-w-ciało” Luce Irigaray we Włoszech. „Teksty Drugie”, nr 5.
Google Scholar

Shukaitis Stevphen, 2010: Nikt nie wie, co może zbuntowane ciało. „Przegląd Anarchistyczny”. 28.08.2010. [Online:] http://www.przeglad-anarchistyczny.org/artykuly/23-reprodukcja-zycia-codziennego/226-nikt-nie-wie-co-moze-zbuntowane-cialo [29.03.2019].
Google Scholar

Szopa Katarzyna, 2018: Poetyka rozkwitania. Różnica płciowa w filozofii Luce Irigaray. Warszawa: Instytut Badań Literackich PAN. Wydawnictwo.
Google Scholar

Toupin Louise, 2018: Wages for Housework: A History of an International Feminist Movement, 1972–77. Trans. Käthe Roth. Vancouver–Toronto: Pluto Press and UBC Press.
Google Scholar

Weinbaum Alis Eve, 1994: Marx, Irigaray, and the Politics of Reproduction. „Differences: a Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies”, vol. 6.
Google Scholar

Vol. 13 No. 1 (2019)
Published: 2019-06-28

ISSN: 2084-0772

eISSN: 2353-0928

Publisher

Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego | University of Silesia Press

Submit