Published: 2026-04-24

The criminalisation of abortion in Uganda: Understanding Article 22(2) of the Constitution of Uganda in light of its drafting history

Jamil Ddamulira Mujuzi Logo ORCID

Abstract

Article 22(2) of the Constitution of Uganda (1995) provides that “[n]o person has the right to terminate the life of an unborn child except as may be authorised by law.” It is different from the approaches taken in some African countries such as in Somalia, Kenya and Eswatini where the constitutions expressly provide for some of the grounds on which a pregnancy can be terminated. Parliament has not yet enacted legislation to give effect to Article 22(2). Hence, sections 130–132 of the Penal Code Act (1950) still criminalise attempts to procure abortion; procuring miscarriage; and supplying drugs to procure abortion. However, section 207 of the Penal Code Act allows abortion as a “surgical operation” to save the life of the mother. The Supreme Court of Uganda has explained different rules of constitutional interpretation. Referring back to the drafting history of the Constitution is one of those rules. There are different rules of constitutional interpretation the reliance on which could lead to a different outcome when interpreting Article 22(2). In this article, I rely on the drafting history of the Constitution to argue that Article 22(2) should be interpreted as permitting abortion for the purpose of saving a woman’s life even if it is not done as a surgical operation. Thus, I disagree with the Constitutional Court’s decision in Human Rights Awareness Promotion Forum and Others v Attorney General (2025), in which the Court held that the drafting history of Article 22(2) suggests that abortion is only legal if committed as a surgical procedure to save the life of a mother. I also argue that abortion on other grounds such as where a foetus has serious abnormalities and that the pregnancy was as a result of a criminal act such as rape, defilement or incest has to be legalised by Parliament expressly. Thus, the argument that Article 22(2) should be interpreted as legalising abortion on common law grounds is not supported by its drafting history.

Download files

Citation rules

Mujuzi, J. D. (2026). The criminalisation of abortion in Uganda: Understanding Article 22(2) of the Constitution of Uganda in light of its drafting history. Problemy Prawa Karnego, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.31261/PPK.2026.10.01.06

Cited by / Share

Licence

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.

1. License

The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.

2. Author’s Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.

If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".

ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).

3. User Rights

Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.

4. Co-Authorship

If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.

I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.

Domyślna okładka

2026
Published: 2020-10-09


ISSN: 0208-5577
eISSN: 2353-9712
Ikona DOI 10.31261/PPK

Publisher
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego | University of Silesia Press

Licence CC Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies for proper operation, in order to use the portal fully you must accept cookies.