Kluczowa rola psychologii we wspieraniu i w stymulowaniu innowacyjności

Barbara Kożusznik

doi:10.31261/CHOWANNA.2010.35.03

Published: 2010-12-30

No. 2 (35) (2010)

Crucial role of psychology in stimulating and supporting innovativeness

Barbara Kożusznik

Section: Studies and essays

https://doi.org/10.31261/CHOWANNA.2010.35.03

Abstract

In the rapidly changing technology in the global world and rising expansion of Asia, our postindustrial civilization to survive must make a shift towards emphasis on creativity and empathy and human ability to adapt to changes to meet the challenges of new consumption based on values and the infuse of values into economy. To flourish and develop the organizations must give way to inventiveness, empathy and meaning. That means that psychological knowledge and skills are crucial in the process in innovation creation, transfer and adaptation as Poland is characterized by low level of innovativeness should take it into account. Psychology, and especially psychology of organization and innovation, offer models and practical suggestions to make innovativeness processes more successful. Nevertheless, as the research results indicate, there are still psychological barriers in the process of innovation which should be broken by treating psychology as a partner for innovative process problem solving and psychologists themselves should be determined to play important crucial role with their knowledge and skills.

Keywords:

innovation , implementation of innovation psychology , organizational psychology

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Kożusznik, B. (2010). Crucial role of psychology in stimulating and supporting innovativeness. Chowanna, (2 (35), 21–50. https://doi.org/10.31261/CHOWANNA.2010.35.03

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.

1. License

The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.

2. Author’s Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.

If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".

ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).

3. User Rights

Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.

4. Co-Authorship

If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.

I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.

References

Aburdene P.: Megatrends 2010: The rise of conscious capitalism. Charlottesville, VA, 2005.
Google Scholar

Allport F.H.: A Structuronomics Conception of Behavior: Individual and Collective. „Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology” 1964, vol. 1.
Google Scholar

Altszuller H.: Algorytm wynalazku. Warszawa 1972.
Google Scholar

Altszuller G.S.: Elementy teorii twórczości inżynierskiej. Przeł. i opatrzył komentarzem A. Góralski. Warszawa 1983.
Google Scholar

Argyris Ch.: Integrating Individuals and Organizations. New York 1970.
Google Scholar

Argyris Ch.: Leadership, learning and Changing the Status Quo. „Organizational Dynamics” 1976, vol. 4/3.
Google Scholar

Auhagen A.E.: Psycho-soziale Faktoren von Innovation. „Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung” 2002, Bd. 33, Nr. 3.
Google Scholar

Bennis W.G.: Changing organizations. New York 1966.
Google Scholar

Borowska T.: Godność jako wartość egzystencjalnie kreatywna, jej wymiar wśród innych wartości oraz w poszukiwaniu sensu życia. „Chowanna” 2008, t. 1 (30).
Google Scholar

Brojak-Trzaskowska M.: Uwarunkowania innowacyjności jako źródła rozwoju przedsiębiorstw na przykładzie województwa zachodniopomorskiego. Konferencja Management Forum 2006: Nowoczesne koncepcje i metody zarządzania strategicznego. Warszawa, 12—14 maja 2006 r. Tryb dostępu: http://www.sgh.waw.pl/katedry/ktz/mf2006/referaty/Uwarunkowania_innowacyjnosci_jako_zrodla_rozwoju_przedsiebiorstw_na_przykladzie_wojewodztwa_zachodniopomorskiego.pdf. Data dostępu: wrzesień 2010 r.
Google Scholar

Canton J.: The extreme future: The top trends that will reshape the world in the next 5, 10, and 20 years. New York 2006.
Google Scholar

Cottrell N.B.: Social Facilitation. In: Experimental Social Psychology. Ed. C.G. McClintock. New York 1972.
Google Scholar

Damanpour F.: Organizational Innovation. „Academy of Management Journal” 1991, vol. 34.
Google Scholar

Denning P.J.: The social life of innovation. „Communication of the ACM” 2004, vol. 47, no. 4, April.
Google Scholar

Diener E.: Subjective well-being: the science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. „American Psychologist” 2000, no. 55.
Google Scholar

Drucker P.F.: Innowacja i przedsiębiorczość. Przeł. A. Ehrlich. Warszawa 1992.
Google Scholar

Drucker P.F.: The discipline of innovation. „The Innovative Enterprise” 2002, August.
Google Scholar

Frankl V.: Man’s search for meaning. New York 1984.
Google Scholar

Gaertner S.L., Dovidio J.F.: Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model. Philadelphia 2000.
Google Scholar

Gowler D., Legge K.: Managerial Stress. Essex 1975.
Google Scholar

Graham C.: The economics of happiness: Insights on globalization from a novel approach. „World Economics” 2005, no. 6 (3), s. 41—55. Tryb dostępu: http://www.publicpolicy.umd.edu/ecolecon/details/fall2006/graham_sep22/WEC_00202_00603_Graham.pdf. Data dostępu: listopad 2006 r.
Google Scholar

Handy C.: The hungry spirit: Beyond capitalism. A quest for purpose in the modern world. New York 1999.
Google Scholar

Harvey-Jones J.: Managing to survive. Heinemann 1993.
Google Scholar

Huitt W.: The SCANS report revisited. Paper delivered at the Fifth Annual Gulf South Business and Vocational Education Conference, Valdosta State University, Valdosta, GA, April 18, 1997. Tryb dostępu: http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuittcol/student/scanspap.html. Data dostępu: marzec 2007 r.
Google Scholar

Huitt W.: Success in the information age: A paradigm shift. Revision of background paper developed for workshop presentation at the Georgia Independent School Association, Atlanta, Georgia 1999. Tryb dostępu: http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuittcol/inforage.html. Data dostępu: sierpień 2005 r.
Google Scholar

Johns E.A.: The Sociology of Organizational Change. New York 1973.
Google Scholar

Katz D., Kahn R.L.: Społeczna psychologia organizacji. Warszawa 1979.
Google Scholar

Konrad R.: Tech jobs leave U.S. for India, Russia: Jobs exports may imperil U.S. programmers. Associated Press 2003. Tryb dostępu: http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/biztech/07/14/moves.offshore.ap/index.html. Data dostępu: marzec 2007 r.
Google Scholar

Kotlikoff L., Burns S.: The coming generational storm. What you need to know about America’s economic future. Cambridge 2004.
Google Scholar

Kożusznik B.: Styl kierowania a stosunek pracowników do innowacji. W: Materiały XX Zjazdu Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego. Poznań 1981.
Google Scholar

Kożusznik B.: Style kierowania. Uwarunkowania sytuacyjne i psychologiczne. Katowice 1985.
Google Scholar

Kożusznik B.: Podmiotowość zespołu pracowniczego w organizacji. Katowice 1996.
Google Scholar

Kożusznik B.: Taktyki wpływu polskich menedżerów. Polskie regiony zachodnie w Unii Europejskiej. Szanse i oczekiwania. Zielona Góra 2004.
Google Scholar

Kożusznik B.: Wpływ społeczny w organizacji. Warszawa 2005.
Google Scholar

Kożusznik B.: Work and organizational psychologists’ contribution to the world. Division 1. Second survey. „Work and Organizational Psychology Newsletter” 2007, vol. 1 (October).
Google Scholar

Kożusznik B.: Zachowania człowieka w organizacji. Warszawa 2007.
Google Scholar

Kożusznik B.: Badania psychospołecznego potencjału firm. Niepublikowane raporty. Fundacja CITRUS Katowice 2009.
Google Scholar

Kożusznik B., Jezierski T.: Psychologia doskonalenia zespołów. Katowice 1984.
Google Scholar

Lewin K.: Group Decisions and Social Change. In: Readings in Social Psychology. Eds. N. Newcomb, E.L. Hartley. New York 1952.
Google Scholar

Looise J.K., van Riemsdijk M.: Innovating Organizations and HRM: A Conceptual Framework. „Manager Revue” 2004, vol. 15, no. 3.
Google Scholar

Markman A.L., Wood K.: Tools for Innovation. Oxford 2009.
Google Scholar

Maslow A.: The farther reaches of human nature. New York 1971.
Google Scholar

Mathaway S.K., Wheeler S., Simmons B.: Self-managing teams: Enhancing Organizational Innovativeness. „Organizational Development Journal” 2005, vol. 23, no. 3.
Google Scholar

Naisbitt J.: Megatrends. New York 1982.
Google Scholar

Nęcka E.: Trening twórczości. Olsztyn 1992.
Google Scholar

Nęcka E.: Twórcze rozwiązywanie problemów. Kraków 1994.
Google Scholar

Osborn A.F.: Applied Imagination. New York 1959.
Google Scholar

Parsons T.: Szkice z teorii socjologicznej. Przeł. A. Bentkowska. Wstępem opatrzył H. Białaszewski. Warszawa 1969.
Google Scholar

Peiró J.M., Meliá J.L.: Formal and Informal Power in Organizations: Testing a Bifactorial Model of Power in role-sets. „Applied Psychology” 2003, vol. 52, no. 1.
Google Scholar

Pietrasiński Z.: Ogólne i psychologiczne zagadnienia innowacji. Warszawa 1970.
Google Scholar

Pietrasiński Z.: Psychologia wprowadzania innowacji. „Wektory” 1971, nr 1.
Google Scholar

Pink D.: A whole new mind: Moving from the Information Age to the Conceptual Age. New York 2005.
Google Scholar

Pink D.: Oprah talks to Daniel Pink. Interview with Oprah Winfrey, 2009. Tryb dostępu: http://www.oprah.com/printarticlefull/omagazine/200812_omag_ocut_pink.html.
Google Scholar

Data dostępu: 30 lipca 2009 r.
Google Scholar

Ratajczak Z.: Człowiek w sytuacji innowacyjnej. Warszawa 1980.
Google Scholar

Robson M.: Problem solving in groups. Aldershot—Brookfield 1993.
Google Scholar

Rogers E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations. New York 1962.
Google Scholar

Schein E.: Organizational Psychology. New York 1988.
Google Scholar

Schumpeter J.: Teoria rozwoju gospodarczego. Przeł. J. Grzywicka. Wstęp J. Górski. Warszawa 1960.
Google Scholar

Seligman M.: Authentic Happiness. New York 2002.
Google Scholar

Shanteau J., Rohrbaugh C.: Social/Psychological barriers to successful management of technological innovation. In: Risk behavior and risk management in business life. Eds. B. Green et al. Dordrecht—London 2000.
Google Scholar

Sotiriou D., Wittmer D.: Influence Methods of Project Managers: Perceptions of Team Members and Project Managers. „Project Management Journal” 2001, september.
Google Scholar

Toffler A.: The third wave. New York 1981.
Google Scholar

Toffler A.: Powershift. New York 1990.
Google Scholar

Varga K.: Achievement, power and effectiveness of R+D. „Human Relations” 1975.
Google Scholar

Walker J.G.: The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States. „American Political Science Review” 1969, vol. 63.
Google Scholar

West M.: Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. „Applied Psychology” 2002, vol. 51.
Google Scholar

Whitfield P.R.: Creativity in Industry. Harmondsworth 1975.
Google Scholar

Zaltman G., Duncan R., Holbek J.: Innovations and Organizations. New York 1973.
Google Scholar

No. 2 (35) (2010)
Published: 2025-08-28

ISSN: 0137-706X

eISSN: 2353-9682

Publisher

Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego | University of Silesia Press

Licence CC

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Submit