Niemożliwe „stawanie-się-mężczyzną” Ovidiu Anemţoaicei O propunere de corpo-etică feministă Masculinităţi și filosofia diferenţei sexuale

Tomasz Krupa

doi:10.31261/SSP.2019.13.07

Published: 2019-06-22

Vol. 13 No. 1 (2019)

The Impossible “Becoming-Man”. Ovidiu Anemţoaicei’s Male Bodies and Sexual Difference. A Proposal for a Feminist Corporeo-Ethics

Tomasz Krupa

Section: Essays and Articles

https://doi.org/10.31261/SSP.2019.13.07

Abstract

In this contribution, the author attempts to critically discuss main issues referred to by Ovidiu Anemţoaicei in his book Male Bodies and Sexual Difference.
A Proposal for a Feminist Corporeo-Ethics (published in Romanian, 2017). Anemţoaicei’s is a new take on relations between male bodies, men, and masculinity that endeavours to implement, in the field of men’s studies, the notion of sexual difference as understood in Luce Irigaray’s thought. His readings of Irigaray’s works lead Anemţoaicei to a postDeleuzian interpretation of the concept of “becoming-man,” which allows him to outline a framework of newly-defined masculinity, a non-hegemonic ethical stance on female and male corporeality.

Keywords:

masculinity , female and male in-corporation , sexual difference , Luce Irigaray , becoming-man

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Krupa, T. (2019). The Impossible “Becoming-Man”. Ovidiu Anemţoaicei’s Male Bodies and Sexual Difference. A Proposal for a Feminist Corporeo-Ethics. Śląskie Studia Polonistyczne [Silesian Journal of Polish Studies], 13(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.31261/SSP.2019.13.07

Cited by / Share

References

Anemţoaicei Ovidiu, 2014: Masculinities, Male Bodies and Sexual Difference: A Sketch for an Impossible „Becoming-Man”. Budapest: Department of Gender Studies, Central European University.
Google Scholar

Anemţoaicei Ovidiu, 2017: O propunere de corpo-etică feministă. Masculinități și filosofia diferenței sexuale. București: Tracus Arte.
Google Scholar

Anemţoaicei Ovidiu, 2018: Male Bodies and Sexual Difference. A Proposal for a Feminist Corporeo-Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar Publishing.
Google Scholar

Braidotti Rosi, 2009: Podmioty nomadyczne. Ucieleśnienie i różnica seksualna w feminizmie współczesnym. Przeł. Aleksandra Derra. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne.
Google Scholar

Deleuze Gilles, Guattari Félix, 2015: Tysiąc Plateau. Warszawa: Fundacja Bęc Zmiana.
Google Scholar

Flannigan Saint-Aubin Arthur, 1994: The Male Body and Literary Metaphors for Masculinity. In: Theorizing Masculinities. Eds. Harry Brod, Michael Kaufman. London: Sage.
Google Scholar

Irigaray Luce, 1996: I Love to You: Sketch for a Felicity Within History. Trans. Alison Martin. London–New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Irigaray Luce, 2016: Niewykluczone, że pielęgnowanie dotyku wciąż może nas ocalić. Przeł. Katarzyna Szopa. „Kwartalnik Filozoficzny”, z. 2.
Google Scholar

Kłosińska Krystyna, 2010: Zwrot analny. W: Eadem: Feministyczna krytyka literacka. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Google Scholar

Szopa Katarzyna, 2016: „Ekonomia łożyska”, czyli Luce Irigaray filozofia spotkania. W: Kobieta, literatura, medycyna. Red. Arleta Galant,
Google Scholar

Agata Zawiszewska. Szczecin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego.
Google Scholar

Szopa Katarzyna, 2018: Poetyka rozkwitania. Różnica płciowa w filozofii Luce Irigaray. Warszawa: Instytut Badań Literackich PAN. Wydawnictwo.
Google Scholar

Vol. 13 No. 1 (2019)
Published: 2019-06-28

ISSN: 2084-0772

eISSN: 2353-0928

Publisher

Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego | University of Silesia Press

Submit