Co decyduje o zmianie stylu życia? Filozoficzne założenia weganizmu jako postawy moralnej człowieka wobec zwierząt pozaludzkich

Adriana Schetz

doi:10.31261/ZOOPHILOLOGICA.2024.13.11

Published: 2024-04-25

No. 1 (13) (2024)

What Determines a Lifestyle Change? Philosophical Assumptions of Veganism as a Moral Attitude of Humans Towards Non-Human Animals

Adriana Schetz

Section: ARTICLES

https://doi.org/10.31261/ZOOPHILOLOGICA.2024.13.11

Abstract

The article provides a philosophical basis for the actors influencing the decision to change the lifestyle to a vegan one. The author has determined that these factors include: (1) first of all, being consistent with the principle characteristic of deep ecology, according to which the life of each subject (including, of course, human) is the occurring or final value, and (2) a level of emotional intelligence, especially empathy. The author also considers one of the more serious moral dilemma that vegans face, which she has termed the dilemma of deep ecology.

Keywords:

vaganism , life style , emotional intelligence , deep ecology , empathy

Download files

FILOZOFIA / Artykuł (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Schetz, A. (2024). What Determines a Lifestyle Change? Philosophical Assumptions of Veganism as a Moral Attitude of Humans Towards Non-Human Animals. Zoophilologica. Polish Journal of Animal Studies, (1 (13), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.31261/ZOOPHILOLOGICA.2024.13.11

Cited by / Share

References

Bińczyk, Ewa. Epoka człowieka, Retoryka i marazm antropocenu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 2018.
Google Scholar

Block, Ned. “Consciousness and Cognitive Access”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society New Series, 108 (2008): 289–317.
Google Scholar

Dresp-Langley, Birgitta. “Why the Brain Knows More than We Do: Non-Conscious Representations and Their Role in the Construction of Conscious Experience”. Brain Sciences, 2 (1) (2012): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fbrainsci2010001.
Google Scholar

Dziarnowska, Wioletta, Piotr Przybysz. „Emocje moralne jako podstawa zmysłu moralnego. Defekty zmysłu moralnego”. Rocznik Kognitywistyczny, 4 (2011): 57–64.
Google Scholar

Holler, Sophie, Holger Cramer. “Differences Between Omnivores and Vegetarians in Personality Profiles, Values, and Empathy: A Systematic Review”. Frontiers in Psychology, 12 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.579700.
Google Scholar

Ioannidou, F., Vaya Konstantikaki. “Empathy and Emotional Intelligence: What is it Really about?”. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 1 (3) (2008): 118–123.
Google Scholar

Korsgaard, Christine. Fellow Creatures. Our Obligations to the Other Animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Google Scholar

Korsgaard, Christine. “Two Distinctions in Goodness”. Philosophical Review, 92 (1983): 169–195. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184924.
Google Scholar

Link, Charlotte. Lisia dolina. Przeł. Dariusz Guzik. Warszawa: Sonia Draga, 2013.
Google Scholar

Næss, Arne. Ecology, Community and Lifestyle. Cambridge: CUP, 1989.
Google Scholar

Næss, Arne. “The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement. A Summary (Summary of an Introductory Lecture at the 3rd World Future Research Conference, Bucharest, 3–10 September 1972)”. Inquiry, 16 (1) (1973): 95–100.
Google Scholar

Zimmerman, Michael J., Ben Bradley. “Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Value”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2019 Edition). 09.01.2019. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/value-intrinsic-extrinsic/ (dostęp: 26.04.2023).
Google Scholar

No. 1 (13) (2024)
Published: 2024-06-18

ISSN: 2719-2687

eISSN: 2451-3849

10.31261/ZOOPHILOLOGICA

Publisher

Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego | University of Silesia Press

Submit

What Determines a Lifestyle Change? Philosophical Assumptions of Veganism as a Moral Attitude of Humans Towards Non-Human Animals

Abstract

Keywords:

Adriana Schetz

Information