https://doi.org/10.31261/ZOOPHILOLOGICA.2022.10.04
Rats have accompanied human habitats for millennia. This complicated coexistence has led to the development of culture-laden narratives that excluded these creatures from the sphere of human moral care. Currently, the existential standing of the genus Rattus appears paradoxical. Contemporary free-living rats are among animals that are widely despised and subject to the most intense extermination. At the same time, due to their social nature and neural structure that is homologous to a large extent to Homo sapiens, they serve as models for research into human psychological properties. Recently, the accumulation of discoveries
regarding many nonhuman species’ cognitive abilities has reignited ethical debate about the welfare and even the rights of “higher” animals. However, rats remain outside its mainstream focus. Meanwhile, based on research on rodents one may arrive at the image which is contrary to common beliefs about rats. The article presents the stereotypical views of rats’ social status obtained from research on the perception of social groups in accordance with the warmth and competence dimensions of Susan Fiske’s Stereotype Content Model. Then, Mark Rowlands’ concept of a moral subject is presented. Against this backdrop, a review of the latest findings of cognitive sciences regarding the properties of the Rattus species is carried out, in order to confront those research findings with Rowlands’ concept. The article aims to underscore the contradiction between the stereotypical perception of the rat and the empirical data, to finally indicate fundamental ethical implications of such a state of affairs.
Download files
Citation rules
Cited by / Share
References
Abbott, Alison. „Artificial Intelligence Decodes the Facial Expressions of Mice”. Nature. April 2, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01002-7.
Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Translated by Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998.
Google Scholar
Ainslie, George, i R.J. Herrnstein. „Preference Reversal and Delayed Reinforcement”. Animal Learning & Behavior, vol. 9 (4) (1981): 476–482. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209777.
Google Scholar
Akam, Thomas, Ines Rodrigues-Vaz, Ivo Marcelo, Xiangyu Zhang, Michael Pereira, Rodrigo Freire Oliveira, Peter Dayan i Rui M. Costa. „The Anterior Cingulate Cortex Predicts Future States to Mediate Model-based Action Selection”. Neuron, vol. 109 (1) (2021): 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.10.013.
Google Scholar
Alemi-Neissi, Alireza, Federica Bianca Rosselli i Davide Zoccolan. „Multifeatural Shape Processing in Rats Engaged in Invariant Visual Object Recognition”. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, vol. 33 (14) (2013): 5939–5956. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3629-12.2013.
Google Scholar
Allen, Colin. „Animal Concepts Revisited: The Use of Self-Monitoring as an Empirical Approach”. Erkenntnis, vol. 51 (1999): 537–544. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005545425672.
Google Scholar
Allen, Colin. „Associative Learning”. W The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Animal Minds. Edited by Kristin Andrews i Jacob Beck, 401–408. London–New York: Routledge, 2018.
Google Scholar
Anderson, David J., i Ralph Adolphs. „A Framework for Studying Emotions across Species”. Cell, vol. 157 (1) (2014): 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.003.
Google Scholar
Andrews, Kristin. The Animal Mind: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Animal Cognition. Abingdon: Routledge-Taylor & Francis Group, 2015.
Google Scholar
Andrews, Kristin. How to Study Animal Minds. The Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.
Google Scholar
Andrews, Kristin, i Susana Monsó. „Why Don’t Rats Get the Same Ethical Protections as Primates?”. Aeon. March 2, 2020. https://aeon.co/essays/why-dont-rats-get-the-same-ethical-protections-as-primates (dostęp: 27.10.2020).
Google Scholar
Andrews, Kristin, i Jacob Beck, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Animal Minds. London–New York: Routledge, 2018.
Google Scholar
Araujo, Ana Paula de Castro, Jalles Dantas de Lucenaa, Davi Carvalho Drieskens, Lívia Rodrigues Neves, Karen Cristina Pugliane, Hindiael Aeraf Belchior, Rochele Castelo-Branco i Flávio Freitas Barbosa. „Rats Recognize Spatial and Temporal Attributes in a New Object Recognition Memory Task with Multiple Trials”. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 348 (2021): 108936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108936.
Google Scholar
Atsak, Piray, Marie Orre, Petra Bakker, Leonardo Cerliani, Benno Roozendaal, Valeria Gazzola, Marta Moita i Christian Keysers. „Experience Modulates Vicarious Freezing in Rats: A Model for Empathy”. PLoS ONE, vol. 6 (7) (2011): e21855. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021855.
Google Scholar
Balter, Michael. „Animal Cognition. ‘Killjoys’ Challenge Claims of Clever Animals”. Science, vol. 335 (6072) (2012): 1036–1037. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.335.6072.1036.
Google Scholar
Barrett, Lisa Feldman. „The Theory of Constructed Emotion: An Active Inference Account of Interoception and Categorization”. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, vol. 12 (1) (2017): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw154.
Google Scholar
Barrett, Lisa Feldman, Kristen A. Lindquist, Eliza Bliss-Moreau, Seth Duncan, Maria Gendron, Jennifer Mize i Lauren Brennan. „Of Mice and Men: Natural Kinds of Emotions in the Mammalian Brain? A Response to Panksepp and Izard”. Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 2 (3) (2007): 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2007.00046.x.
Google Scholar
Bechtel, William. „Investigating Neural Representations: The Tale of Place Cells”. Synthese, vol. 193 (5) (2016): 1287–1321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0480-8.
Google Scholar
Bekoff, Marc, i Jessica Pierce. Dzika sprawiedliwość. Moralne życie zwierząt. Tłumaczenie Sebastian Szymański. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press, 2018.
Google Scholar
Ben-Ami Bartal, Inbal, Jean Decety i Peggy Mason. „Helping a Cagemate in Need: Empathy and Pro-Social Behavior in Rats”. Science, vol. 334 (6061) (2011): 1427–1430. https://doi.org/10.1126%2Fscience.1210789.
Google Scholar
Ben-Ami Bartal, Inbal, David A. Rodgers, Maria Sol Bernardez Sarria, Jean Decety i Peggy Mason. „Pro-social Behavior in Rats is Modulated by Social Experience”. Edited by Russ Fernald. eLife, vol. 3 (2014): e01385. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01385.
Google Scholar
Ben-Ami Bartal, Inbal, Haozhe Shan, Nora M.R. Molasky, Teresa M. Murray, Jasper Z. Williams, Jean Decety i Peggy Mason. „Anxiolytic Treatment Impairs Helping Behavior in Rats”. Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 7 (2016): 850– 857. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00850.
Google Scholar
Beran, Michael. Self-Control in Animals and People. London: Academic Press, 2018.
Google Scholar
Beran, Michael J. „The Comparative Science of ‘Self-Control’: What Are We Talking About?” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 6 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00051.
Google Scholar
Berridge, Kent, i Piotr Winkielman. „What Is an Unconscious Emotion? (The Case for Unconscious ‘Liking’)”. Cognition & Emotion, vol. 17 (2) (2003): 181–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930302289.
Google Scholar
Bielecka, Krystyna. Błądzę, więc myślę. Co to jest błędna reprezentacja? Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, 2018.
Google Scholar
Bielecka, Krystyna. „Błędne reprezentacje a pojęcie funkcji w teleosemantyce. Analiza koncepcji Dretskego i Millikan”. Filozofia Nauki, T. 22, nr 1 (2014): 105–120.
Google Scholar
Blaisdell, Aaron P. „Mental Imagery in Animals: Learning, Memory, and Decision-Making in the Face of Missing Information”. Learning & Behavior, vol. 47 (3) (2019) 193–216. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-019-00386-5.
Google Scholar
Blaisdell, Aaron P., Kosuke Sawa, Kenneth J. Leising i Michael R. Waldmann. „Causal Reasoning in Rats”. Science, vol. 311 (5763) (2006): 1020–1022. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1121872.
Google Scholar
Blaisdell, Aaron P., i Michael R. Waldmann. „Rational Rats: Causal Inference and Representation”. W The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Cognition. Edited by Thomas R. Zentall, Edward A. Wasserman, 75–198. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Google Scholar
Bliss-Moreau, Eliza. „Constructing Nonhuman Animal Emotion”. Current Opinion in Psychology, Emotion, vol. 17 (2017): 184–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.011.
Google Scholar
Bloom, Paul. Przeciw empatii. Argumenty za racjonalnym współczuciem. Tłumaczenie z języka angielskiego Marek Chojnacki. Kielce: Charaktery, 2017.
Google Scholar
Boesch, Christophe, Camille Bolé, Nadin Eckhardt i Hedwige Boesch. „Altruism in Forest Chimpanzees: The Case of Adoption”. PLOS ONE, vol. 5 (1) (2010): e8901. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008901.
Google Scholar
Brass, Marcel, i Patrick Haggard. „To Do or Not to Do: The Neural Signature of Self-Control”. Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27 (34) (2007): 9141–9145. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0924-07.2007.
Google Scholar
Brudzynski, Stefan M. „Communication of Adult Rats by Ultrasonic Vocalization: Biological, Sociobiological, and Neuroscience Approaches”. ILAR Journal, vol. 50 (1) (2009): 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar.50.1.43.
Google Scholar
Brudzynski, Stefan M. „Ethotransmission: Communication of Emotional States through Ultrasonic Vocalization in Rats”. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 23 (3) (2013): 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2013.01.014.
Google Scholar
Buckner, Cameron. „Understanding Associative and Cognitive Explanations in Comparative Psychology”. W The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Animal Minds. Edited by Kristin Andrews, Jacob Beck, 409–418. London–New York: Routledge, 2018.
Google Scholar
Burke, Candace J., David R. Euston i Sergio M. Pellis. „What Do You Hear, What Do You Say? Ultrasonic Calls as Signals During Play Fighting in Rats”. International Journal of Play, vol. 9 (1) (2020): 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2020.1720126.
Google Scholar
Burkett, J.P., E. Andari, Z.V. Johnson, D.C. Curry, F.B.M. de Waal i L.J. Young. „Oxytocin-Dependent Consolation Behavior in Rodents”. Science, vol. 351 (6271) (2016): 375–378. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4785.
Google Scholar
Carbone, Larry. „Estimating Mouse and Rat Use in American Laboratories by Extrapolation from Animal Welfare Act-Regulated Species”. Scientific Reports, vol. 11 (1) (2021): 493. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79961-0.
Google Scholar
Carrillo, Maria, Yinging Han, Filippo Migliorati, Ming Liu, Valeria Gazzola i Christian Keysers. „Emotional Mirror Neurons in the Rat’s Anterior Cingulate Cortex”. Current Biology, vol. 29 (8) (2019): 1301–1312.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.03.024.
Google Scholar
Carruthers, Peter. „Meta-cognition in Animals: A Skeptical Look”. Mind & Language, vol. 23 (1) (2008): 58–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2007.00329.x.
Google Scholar
Christopoulos, George I., Xiao-Xiao Liu i Ying-yi Hong. „Toward an Understanding of Dynamic Moral Decision Making: Model-Free and Model-based Learning”. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 144 (4) (2017): 699–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3058-1.
Google Scholar
Church, Russell M. „Emotional Reactions of Rats to the Pain of Others”. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, vol. 52 (2) (1959): 132–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043531.
Google Scholar
Churchland, Patricia S. Conscience: The Origins of Moral Intuition. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2019.
Google Scholar
Churchland, Patricia S. Moralność mózgu. Co neuronauka mówi o moralności. Tłumaczenie i przedmowa Mateusz Hohol, Natalia Marek. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press, 2013.
Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, Tim. „Cooperation between Non-Kin in Animal Societies”. Nature, vol. 462 (7269) (2009): 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08366.
Google Scholar
Coffey, Kevin R., Russell G. Marx i John F. Neumaier. „DeepSqueak: A Deep Learning-based System for Detection and Analysis of Ultrasonic Vocalizations”. Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 44 (2019): 859–868. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-018-0303-6.
Google Scholar
Cordier, Javier Maximiliano, Julieta Paola Aguggia, Víctor Danelon, Franco Rafael Mir, María Angélica Rivarola i Daniel Mascó. „Postweaning Enriched Environment Enhances Cognitive Function and Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Signaling in the Hippocampus in Maternally Separated Rats”. Neuroscience, vol. 453 (2021): 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.09.058.
Google Scholar
Cox, Stewart S., i Carmela M. Reichel. „Rats Display Empathic Behavior Independent of the Opportunity for Social Interaction”. Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 45 (7) (2020): 1097–1104. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-019-0572-8.
Google Scholar
Crawford, L.E., et al. „Enriched Environment Exposure Accelerates Rodent Driving Skills”. Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 379 (2020): 112309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112309.
Google Scholar
Crystal, Jonathon D. „Prospective Cognition in Rats”. Learning and Motivation, vol. 43 (4) (2012): 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2012.05.006.
Google Scholar
Crystal, Jonathon D. „Remembering the Past and Planning for the Future in Rats”. Behavioural Processes, vol. 93 (2013): 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2012.11.014.
Google Scholar
Dacey, Mike. „A New View of Association and Associative Models”. W The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Animal Minds. Edited by Kristin Andrews i Jacob Beck, 418–426. London–New York: Routledge, 2018.
Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. Reprint ed. London: Penguin Books, 1999.
Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio. Dziwny porządek rzeczy. Życie, uczucia i tworzenie kultury. Przełożył Andrzej Jankowski. Poznań: Dom Wydawniczy Rebis, 2018.
Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio. W poszukiwaniu Spinozy. Radość, smutek i czujący mózg. Przełożył Janusz Szczepański. Poznań: Dom Wydawniczy Rebis, 2005.
Google Scholar
Das, Ushinik, Anshu Kumari, Shruthi Sharma i Laximi T. Rao. „Demonstration of Altruistic Behaviour in Rats”. BioRxiv (2019): 805481. https://doi.org/10.1101/805481.
Google Scholar
Davey, G.C., i S. Marzillier. „Disgust and Animal Phobias”. W Disgust and Its Disorders: Theory Assessment, and Treatment Implications. Edited by Bunmi Olatunji, 169–190. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 2008.
Google Scholar
Davis, Hank. „Transitive Inference in Rats (Rattus norvegicus)”. Journal of Comparative Psychology , vol. 106 (1992): 342–349. https://doi.org/10.1037//0735-7036.106.4.342.
Google Scholar
Davis, Hank. „Underestimating the Rat’s Intelligence”. Cognitive Brain Research, vol. 3 (3–4) (1996): 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6410(96)00014-6.
Google Scholar
Dayan, Peter, i Kent C. Berridge. „Model-based and Model-free Pavlovian Reward Learning: Revaluation, Revision, and Revelation”. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 14 (2) (2014): 473–492. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-014-0277-8.
Google Scholar
Decety, Jean, i Jason M. Cowell. „The Complex Relation between Morality and Empathy”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 18 (7) (2014): 337–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.008.
Google Scholar
Decety, Jean, Inbal Ben-Ami Bartal, Florina Uzefovsky i Ariel Knafo-Noam. „Empathy as a Driver of Prosocial Behaviour: Highly Conserved Neurobehavioural Mechanisms Across Species”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 371 (1686) (2016): 20150077. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0077.
Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C. „Intentional Systems in Cognitive Ethology: The ‘Panglossian Paradigm’ Defended”. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 6 (3) (1983): 343–390. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00016393.
Google Scholar
Dere, Ekrem, Dorothea Dere, Maria Angelica de Souza Silva, Joseph P. Huston i Armin Zlomuzica. „Fellow Travellers: Working Memory and Mental Time Travel in Rodents”. Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 352 (2018): 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2017.03.026.
Google Scholar
Djurdjević, Vladimir, Alessio Ansuini, Daniele Bertolini, Jakob H. Macke i Davide Zoccolan. „Accuracy of Rats in Discriminating Visual Objects Is Explained by the Complexity of Their Perceptual Strategy”. Current Biology, vol. 28 (7): 1005–1015.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.02.037.
Google Scholar
Dolensek, Nate, Daniel A. Gehrlach, Alexandra S. Klein i Nadine Gogolla. „Facial Expressions of Emotion States and Their Neuronal Correlates in Mice”. Science, vol. 368 (6486) (2020): 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz9468.
Google Scholar
Dolivo, Vassilissa, i Michael Taborsky. „Norway Rats Reciprocate Help According to the Quality of Help They Received”. Biology Letters, vol. 11 (2) (2015): 20140959. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2014.0959.
Google Scholar
Donaldson, Zoe R., i Larry J. Young. „Oxytocin, Vasopressin, and the Neurogenetics of Sociality”. Science, vol. 322 (5903) (2008): 900–904. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1158668.
Google Scholar
Du, Rui, Wen-Jun Luo, Kai-Wen Geng, Chun-Li Li, Yang Yu, Na Wei i Jun Chen. „Empathic Contagious Pain and Consolation in Laboratory Rodents: Species and Sex Comparisons”. Neuroscience Bulletin, vol. 36 (6) (2020): 649–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-020-00465-y.
Google Scholar
Ebbesen, Christian L., i Robert C. Froemke. „Body Language Signals for Rodent Social Communication”. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 68 (2021): 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2021.01.008.
Google Scholar
Fang, Zhiyong, Han Li, Gang Chen i JiongJiong Yang. „Unconscious Processing of Negative Animals and Objects: Role of the Amygdala Revealed by FMRI”. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 10 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00146.
Google Scholar
Ferretti, Valentina, Federica Maltese, Gabriella Contarini, Marco Nigro, Alessandra Bonavia, Huiping Huang, Valentina Gigliucci et al. „Oxytocin Signaling in the Central Amygdala Modulates Emotion Discrimination in Mice”. Current Biology, vol. 29 (12) (2019): 1938–1953.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.070.
Google Scholar
Finlayson, Kathryn, Jessica Frances Lampe, Sara Hintze, Hanno Würbel i Luca Melotti. „Facial Indicators of Positive Emotions in Rats”. PLoS ONE, vol. 11 (11) (2016): e0166446. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166446.
Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T. „Stereotype Content: Warmth and Competence Endure”. Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 27 (2) (2018): 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417738825.
Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T., Amy J.C. Cuddy i Peter Glick. „Universal Dimensions of Social Cognition: Warmth and Competence”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 11 (2) (2007): 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005.
Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Simon. „Against Morgan’s Canon”. W The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Animal Minds. Edited by Kristin Andrews i Jacob Beck, 427–436. London–New York: Routledge, 2018.
Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Simon. „Animal Morality: What Is the Debate About?” Biology & Philosophy, vol. 32 (6) (2017): 1151–1183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-017-9599-6.
Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry Alan. Język myśli. LOT 2. Przełożył Witold M. Hensel. Przedmową opatrzył Robert Piłat (Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 2011).
Google Scholar
Fruteau, Cécile, Bernhard Voelkl, Eric van Damme i Ronald Noë. „Supply and Demand Determine the Market Value of Food Providers in Wild Vervet Monkeys”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 106 (29) (2009): 12007–12012. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812280106.
Google Scholar
Galef, G. „Direct and Indirect Behavioral Pathways to the Social Transmission of Food Avoidance”. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 443 (1985): 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1985.tb27074.x.
Google Scholar
Galtress, Tiffany, Ana Garcia i Kimberly Kirkpatrick. „Individual Differences in Impulsive Choice and Timing in Rats”. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, vol. 98 (1) (2012): 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2012.98-65.
Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, Michael S. The Social Brain: Discovering the Networks of the Mind. New York: Basic Books, 1985.
Google Scholar
Gerber, Nina, Manon K. Schweinfurth i Michael Taborsky. „The Smell of Cooperation: Rats Increase Helpful Behaviour When Receiving Odour Cues of a Conspecific Performing a Cooperative Task”. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 287 (2020): 20202327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.2327.
Google Scholar
Gheusi, Gilles, Glyn Goodall i Robert Dantzer. „Individually Distinctive Odours Represent Individual Conspecifics in Rats”. Animal Behaviour, vol. 53 (5) (1997): 593–944. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0314.
Google Scholar
Gouveia, Kelly, i Jane L. Hurst. „Improving the Practicality of Using Non-Aversive Handling Methods to Reduce Background Stress and Anxiety in Laboratory Mice”. Scientific Reports, vol. 9 (1) (2019): 20305. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56860-7.
Google Scholar
Gouveia, Kelly, i Jane L. Hurst. „Optimising Reliability of Mouse Performance in Behavioural Testing: The Major Role of Non-Aversive Handling”. Scientific Reports, vol. 7 (1) (2017): 44999. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44999.
Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua, i Jonathan Haidt. „How (and Where) Does Moral Judgment Work?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 6 (12) (2002): 517–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)02011-9.
Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua D., R. Brian Sommerville, Leigh E. Nystrom, John M. Darley i Jonathan D. Cohen. „An FMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment”. Science, vol. 293 (5537) (2001): 2105–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062872.
Google Scholar
Groman, Stephanie M., Bart Massi, Samuel R. Mathias, Daniel W. Curry, Daeyeol Lee i Jane R. Taylor. „Neurochemical and Behavioral Dissections of Decision-Making in a Rodent Multistage Task”. Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 39 (2) (2019): 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2219-18.2018.
Google Scholar
Gulatowska, Judyta, Paweł Ostaszewski i Maciej Trojan. „Stabilność grupy społecznej jako czynnik wpływający na nasilenie wokalizacji 22 kHz u szczurów”. Psychologia – Etologia – Genetyka, nr 31 (2015): 23–35.
Google Scholar
Haaren, Frans van, Annemieke van Hest i Nanne E. van de Poll. „Self-Control in Male and Female Rats”. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, vol. 49 (2) (1988): 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1988.49-201.
Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan. „The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment”. Psychological Review, vol. 108 (4) (2001): 814–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814.
Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan. Prawy umysł. Dlaczego dobrych ludzi dzieli religia i polityka? Przekład Agnieszka Nowak-Młynikowska. Sopot: Smak Słowa, 2014.
Google Scholar
Hammond, Tayla, Vincent Bombail, Birte L. Nielsen, Simone L. Meddle, Alistair B. Lawrence i Sarah M. Brown. „Relationships between Play and Responses to Tickling in Male Juvenile Rats”. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, vol. 221 (2019): 104879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104879.
Google Scholar
Hanks, Timothy D., i Christopher Summerfield. „Perceptual Decision Making in Rodents, Monkeys, and Humans”. Neuron, vol. 93 (1) (2017): 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.003.
Google Scholar
Hasz, Brendan M., i A. David Redish. „Deliberation and Procedural Automation on a Two-Step Task for Rats”. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, vol. 12 (2018): 15–30. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2018.00030.
Google Scholar
Havlik, John L., Yuri Y. Vieira Sugano, Maura Clement Jacobi, Rahul R. Kukreja, John H. Clement Jacobi i Peggy Mason. „The Bystander Effect in Rats”. Science Advances, vol. 6 (28) (2020): eabb4205. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb4205.
Google Scholar
Heller, Michał, i Józef Życiński. Dylematy ewolucji. Czy fenomen życia da się zredukować do praw fizyki? Współautorzy Mateusz Hohol, Łukasz Kwiatek, Tadeusz Pietrucha, Kinga Wołoszyn. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press, 2016.
Google Scholar
Hernandez-Lallement, Julen, Augustine Triumph Attah, Efe Soyman, Cindy M. Pinhal, Valeria Gazzola i Christian Keysers. „Harm to Others Acts as a Negative Reinforcer in Rats”. Current Biology, vol. 30 (6) (2020): 949-961.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.017.
Google Scholar
Hernandez-Lallement, Julen, Paula Gómez-Sotres i Maria Carrillo. „Towards a Unified Theory of Emotional Contagion in Rodents – A Meta-Analysis”. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 132 (2020): 1229–1248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.09.010.
Google Scholar
Heyes, C.M., i G.R. Dawson. „A Demonstration of Observational Learning in Rats Using Bidirectional Control”. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 42 (1) (1990): 59–71.
Google Scholar
Hickok, Gregory. Mit neuronów lustrzanych. Rzetelna neuronauka komunikacji i poznania. Tłumaczenie Krzysztof Cipora, Aleksandra Machniak. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press, 2016.
Google Scholar
Hills, Thomas T., i Stephen Butterfill. „From Foraging to Autonoetic Consciousness: The Primal Self as a Consequence of Embodied Prospective Foraging”. Current Zoology, vol. 61 (2) (2015): 368–381. https://doi.org/10.1093/czoolo/61.2.368.
Google Scholar
Hodge, Rebecca D., Jeremy A. Miller, Mark Novotny, Brian E. Kalmbach, Jonathan T. Ting, Trygve E. Bakken, Brian D. Aevermann et al. „Transcriptomic Evidence That von Economo Neurons Are Regionally Specialized Extratelencephalic-Projecting Excitatory Neurons”. Nature Communications, vol. 11 (1) (2020): 1172. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14952-3.
Google Scholar
Hohol, Mateusz. Od samokontroli do cnoty. O mechanizmach moralności. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press, 2016.
Google Scholar
Hufthammer, Anne Karin, i Lars Walløe. „Rats Cannot Have Been Intermediate Hosts for Yersinia Pestis during Medieval Plague Epidemics in Northern Europe”. Journal of Archaeological Science, vol. 40 (4) (2013): 1752–1759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.12.007.
Google Scholar
Ibegbu, A.O., U.E. Umana, W.O. Hamman i A.S. Adamu. „Von Economo Neurons: A Review of the Anatomy and Functions”. Austin Journal of Anatomy, vol. 1 (5) (2014): 1026. Pobrano z: https://austinpublishinggroup.com/anatomy/fulltext/Anatomy-v1-id1026.pdf (24.11.2022).
Google Scholar
Ishiyama, S., i M. Brecht. „Neural Correlates of Ticklishness in the Rat Somatosensory Cortex”. Science, vol. 354 (6313) (2016): 757–760. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah5114.
Google Scholar
Izquierdo, Alicia, i Annabelle M. Belcher. „Rodent Models of Adaptive Decision Making”. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 829 (2012): 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-458-2_5.
Google Scholar
Jamieson, Dale. „Animal and Ethics, Agents and Patients”. W The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Animal Minds. Edited by Kristin Andrews, Jacob Beck, 461–468. London–New York: Routledge, 2018.
Google Scholar
Jaramillo, Santiago, i Anthony M. Zador. „Mice and Rats Achieve Similar Levels of Performance in an Adaptive Decision-Making Task”. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, vol. 8 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00173.
Google Scholar
Jarzębowska, Gabriela. „Kanał jako to, co wyparte. Szczur wobec binarnej logiki nowoczesności”. Maska. Magazyn antropologiczno-społeczno-kulturowy, nr 34 (2017): 103–111.
Google Scholar
Jarzębowska, Gabriela. „Retoryka deratyzacji w PRL: od czystki etnicznej i politycznej do czystki gatunkowej”. Teksty Drugie, nr 2 (2018): 120–137. https://doi.org/10.18318/td.2018.2.8.
Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark. Morality for Humans: Ethical Understanding from the Perspective of Cognitive Science. Chicago–London: The University of Chicago Press, 2015.
Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark. Znaczenie ciała. Estetyka rozumienia ludzkiego. Przeł. Jarosław Płuciennik. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, 2015.
Google Scholar
Judycki, Stanisław. „Zachowanie i działanie”. Diametros, nr 7 (2006): 82–97. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.7.2006.199.
Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. Pułapki myślenia. O myśleniu szybkim i wolnym. Tłumaczenie Piotr Szymczak. Poznań: Media Rodzina, 2012.
Google Scholar
Kano, Fumihiro, Christopher Krupenye, Satoshi Hirata, Masaki Tomonaga i Josep Call. „Great Apes Use Self-Experience to Anticipate an Agent’s Action in a False-Belief Test”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 116 (42) (2019): 20904–20909. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1910095116.
Google Scholar
Kaplan, David Michael. „A Bridge Too Far? Inference and Extrapolation from Model Organisms in Neuroscience”. W The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Animal Minds. Edited by Kristin Andrews i Jacob Beck, 437–447. London–New York: Routledge, 2018.
Google Scholar
Kasperbauer, T.J. Subhuman: The Moral Psychology of Human Attitudes to Animals. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Google Scholar
Keysers, Christian. Empatia. Jak odkrycie neuronów lustrzanych zmienia nasze rozumienie ludzkiej natury. Tłumaczenie i przedmowa Łukasz Kwiatek. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press, 2020.
Google Scholar
Kim, Jangjin, Edward A. Wasserman, Leyre Castro i John H. Freeman. „Anterior Cingulate Cortex Inactivation Impairs Rodent Visual Selective Attention and Prospective Memory”. Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 130 (1) (2016): 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/bne0000117.
Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, Kimberly, Andrew T. Marshall i Aaron P. Smith. „Mechanisms of Individual Differences in Impulsive and Risky Choice in Rats”. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews, vol. 10 (2015): 45–72. https://doi.org/10.3819/ccbr.2015.100003.
Google Scholar
Kiyokawa, Yasushi, i Michael B. Hennessy. „Comparative Studies of Social Buffering: A Consideration of Approaches, Terminology, and Pitfalls”. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 86 (2018): 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.12.005.
Google Scholar
Knapska, Ewelina, Marta Mikosz, Tomasz Werka i Stephen Maren. „Social Modulation of Learning in Rats”. Learning & Memory, vol. 17 (1) (2010): 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.1670910.
Google Scholar
Kondrakiewicz, Kacper, Mateusz Kostecki, Weronika Szadzińska i Ewelina Knapska. „Ecological Validity of Social Interaction Tests in Rats and Mice”. Genes, Brain and Behavior, vol. 18 (1) (2019): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/gbb.12525.
Google Scholar
Kremer, L., S.E.J. Klein Holkenborg, I. Reimert, J.E. Bolhuis i L.E. Webb. „The Nuts and Bolts of Animal Emotion”. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 113 (2020): 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.01.028.
Google Scholar
Krupenye, Christopher, i Josep Call. „Theory of Mind in Animals: Current and Future Directions”. WIREs Cognitive Science, vol. 10 (6) (2019): e1503. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1503.
Google Scholar
Krupenye, Christopher, Fumihiro Kano, Satoshi Hirata, Josep Call i Michael Tomasello. „Great Apes Anticipate That Other Individuals Will Act According to False Beliefs”. Science, vol. 354 (6308) (2016): 110–114. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf8110.
Google Scholar
Kumazawa-Manita, Noriko, Hiroshi Hama, Atsushi Miyawaki i Atsushi Iriki. „Tool Use Specific Adult Neurogenesis and Synaptogenesis in Rodent (Octodon Degus) Hippocampus”. PLOS ONE, vol. 8 (3) (2013): e58649. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058649.
Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. Kobiety, ogień i rzeczy niebezpieczne. Co kategorie mówią nam o umyśle. Red. naukowa Elżbieta Tabakowska. Przekład Magdalena Buchta, Agnieszka Kotarba, Anna Skucińska. Kraków: Universitas, 2011.
Google Scholar
Laland, K.N., i H.C. Plotkin. „Social Learning and Social Transmission of Foraging Information in Norway Rats (Rattus Norvegicus)”. Animal Learning & Behavior, vol. 18 (3) (1990): 246–251. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205282.
Google Scholar
Laland, K.N., i H.C. Plotkin. „Social Transmission of Food Preferences among Norway Rats by Marking of Food Sites and by Gustatory Contact”. Animal Learning & Behavior, vol. 21 (1) (1993): 35–41. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197974.
Google Scholar
Lampe, Jessica F., Oliver Burman, Hanno Würbel i Luca Melotti. „Context-Dependent Individual Differences in Playfulness in Male Rats”. Developmental Psychobiology, vol. 59 (4) (2017): 460–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.21509.
Google Scholar
Langford, Dale J., Sara E. Crager, Zarrar Shehzad, Shad B. Smith, Susana G. Sotocinal, Jeremy S. Levenstadt, Mona Lisa Chanda, Daniel J. Levitin i Jeffrey S. Mogil. „Social Modulation of Pain as Evidence for Empathy in Mice”. Science, vol. 312 (5782) (2006): 1967–1970. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128322.
Google Scholar
Lazarowski, Lucia, Adam Goodman, Mark Galizio i Katherine Bruce. „Effects of Set Size on Identity and Oddity Abstract-Concept Learning in Rats”. Animal Cognition, vol. 22 (5) (2019): 733–742. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s10071-019-01270-5.
Google Scholar
LeDoux, Joseph. Historia naszej świadomości. Jak po czterech miliardach lat ewolucji powstał świadomy mózg. Ilustracje Caio da Silva Sorrentino. Tłumaczenie Anna Binder, Marek Binder. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press, 2020.
Google Scholar
Litvin, Yoav, D. Caroline Blanchard i Robert J. Blanchard. „Rat 22kHz Ultrasonic Vocalizations as Alarm Cries”. Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 182 (2) (2007): 166–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2006.11.038.
Google Scholar
Llinás, Rodolfo R. Ja z wiru. Od neuronów do selfu. Tłumaczenie na język polski Jan Jakub Trąbka, Piotr Krzysztof Walecki. Przedmowa do wydania polskiego Jan Jakub Trąbka. Wstęp literacki Gabriel Garcia Márquez. Kraków: Uniwersytet Jagielloński, 2007.
Google Scholar
Llinás, Rodolfo R., i Sisir Roy. „The ‘Prediction Imperative’ as the Basis for Self-Awareness”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 364 (1521) (2009): 1301–1307. https://doi.org/10.1098%2Frstb.2008.0309.
Google Scholar
Logue, A.W. „Research on Self-Control: An Integrating Framework”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 11 (4) (1988): 665–679. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053978.
Google Scholar
Lukas, Michael, Iulia Toth, Stefan O. Reber, David A. Slattery, Alexa H. Veenema i Inga D. Neumann. „The Neuropeptide Oxytocin Facilitates Pro-Social Behavior and Prevents Social Avoidance in Rats and Mice”. Neuropsychopharmacology: Official Publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 36 (11) (2011): 2159–2168. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2011.95.
Google Scholar
Lyn, Heidi, Becca Franks, i E. Sue Savage-Rumbaugh. „Precursors of Morality in the Use of the Symbols ‘Good’ and ‘Bad’ in Two Bonobos (Pan Paniscus) and a Chimpanzee (Pan Troglodytes)”. Language & Communication, vol. 28 (3) (2008): 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2008.01.006.
Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Robin. „How the Politics of Inclusion / Exclusion and the Neuroscience of Dehumanization / Rehumanization Can Contribute to Animal Activists’ Strategies: Bestia Sacer II”. Society & Animals, vol. 19 (4) (2011): 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853011X590051.
Google Scholar
Macko, Anna. Umysł moralny. Jak powstają oceny moralne? Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Poltext, 2018.
Google Scholar
MacLean, Evan L., Brian Hare, Charles L. Nunn, Elsa Addessi, Federica Amici, Rindy C. Anderson, Filippo Aureli et al. „The Evolution of Self-Control”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 111 (20) (2014): E2140–2148. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323533111.
Google Scholar
Márquez, Cristina, Scott M. Rennie, Diana F. Costa i Marta A. Moita. „Prosocial Choice in Rats Depends on Food-Seeking Behavior Displayed by Recipients”. Current Biology, vol. 25 (13) (2015): 1736–1745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.018.
Google Scholar
Marshall, Andrew T., Aaron P. Smith i Kimberly Kirkpatrick. „Mechanisms of Impulsive Choice: I. Individual Differences in Interval Timing and Reward Processing”. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, vol. 102 (1) (2014): 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.88.
Google Scholar
Mason, Peggy. „Lessons from Helping Behavior in Rats”. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 68 (2021): 52–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2021.01.001.
Google Scholar
McClure, Jesse, Jeffrey Podos i Heather N. Richardson. „Isolating the Delay Component of Impulsive Choice in Adolescent Rats”. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, vol. 8 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2014.00003.
Google Scholar
Mele, Alfred R. Autonomous Agents: From Self-Control to Autonomy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Google Scholar
Mendes, Natacha, Nikolaus Steinbeis, Nereida Bueno-Guerra, Josep Call i Tania Singer. „Preschool Children and Chimpanzees Incur Costs to Watch Punishment of Antisocial Others”. Nature Human Behaviour, vol. 2 (1) (2018): 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0264-5.
Google Scholar
Meyza, Ksenia Z., i Ewelina Knapska. Neuronal Correlates of Empathy: From Rodent to Human. Cambridge, Mass.: Academic Press, 2018.
Google Scholar
Mikhail, John. Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls’ Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment. Cambridge–New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Google Scholar
Mikhalevich, Irina. „Simplicity and Cognitive Models: Avoiding Old Mistakes in New Experimental Context”. W The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Animal Minds. Edited by Kristin Andrews i Jacob Beck, 420–426. London-New York: Routledge, 2018.
Google Scholar
Miller, Holly C., Kristina F. Pattison, C. Nathan DeWall, Rebecca Rayburn-Reeves i Thomas R. Zentall. „Self-Control Without a ‘Self’?: Common Self-Control Processes in Humans and Dogs”. Psychological Science, vol. 21 (4) (2010): 534–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610364968.
Google Scholar
Miller, Mark, i Andy Clark. „Happily Entangled: Prediction, Emotion, and the Embodied Mind”. Synthese, vol. 195 (6) (2018): 2559–2575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1399-7.
Google Scholar
Miller, Rachael, Markus Boeckle, Sarah A. Jelbert, Anna Frohnwieser, Claudia A.F. Wascher i Nicola S. Clayton. „Self-Control in Crows, Parrots and Nonhuman Primates”. WIREs Cognitive Science, vol. 10 (6) (2019): e1504. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1504.
Google Scholar
Mischel, Walter. Test Marshmallow. O pożytkach płynących z samokontroli. Przekład Agnieszka Nowak-Młynikowska. Sopot: Smak Słowa, 2015.
Google Scholar
Monfils, Marie H., i Laura A. Agee. „Insights from Social Transmission of Information in Rodents”. Genes, Brain and Behavior, vol. 18 (1) (2019): e12534. https://doi.org/10.1111/gbb.12534.
Google Scholar
Monsó, Susana, Judith Benz-Schwarzburg i Annika Bremhorst. „Animal Morality: What It Means and Why It Matters”. The Journal of Ethics, vol. 22 (3) (2018): 283–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-018-9275-3.
Google Scholar
Montminy, Martin. „What Use Is Morgan’s Canon?” Philosophical Psychology, vol. 18 (4) (2005): 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080500229837.
Google Scholar
Nagano, Akane. „Behavioral Task to Assess Physical Causal Understanding in Rats (Rattus Norvegicus)”. Current Psychology, vol. 41 (2022): 8692–8704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01315-w.
Google Scholar
Nagano, Akane. „Rats’ (Rattus Norvegicus) Tool Manipulation Ability Exceeds Simple Patterned Behavior”. PLOS ONE, vol. 14 (12) (2019): e0226569. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226569.
Google Scholar
Nagano, Akane, i Kenjiro Aoyama. „Tool Manipulation by Rats (Rattus Norvegicus) According to the Position of Food”. Scientific Reports, vol. 7 (1) (2017): 5960. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06308-7.
Google Scholar
Nagano, Akane, i Kenjiro Aoyama. „Tool-Use by Rats (Rattus Norvegicus): Tool-Choice Based on Tool Features”. Animal Cognition, vol. 20 (2) (2017): 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-1039-5.
Google Scholar
Nagy, Máté, Attila Horicsányi, Enikő Kubinyi, Iain D. Couzin, Gábor Vásárhelyi, Andrea Flack i Tamás Vicsek. „Synergistic Benefits of Group Search in Rats”. Current Biology, vol. 30 (23) (2020): 4733–4738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.08.079.
Google Scholar
Nakashima, Satoshi F., Masatoshi Ukezono, Hiroshi Nishida, Ryunosuke Sudo i Yuji Takano. „Receiving of Emotional Signal of Pain from Conspecifics in Laboratory Rats”. Royal Society Open Science, vol. 2 (2015): 140381. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.140381.
Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Google Scholar
Oberliessen, Lina, i Tobias Kalenscher. „Social and Non-social Mechanisms of Inequity Aversion in Non-human Animals”. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 13 (2019): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00133.
Google Scholar
Oberliessen, Lina, Julen Hernandez-Lallement, Sandra Schäble, Marijn van Wingerden, Maayke Seinstra i Tobias Kalenscher. „Inequity Aversion in Rats, Rattus Norvegicus”. Animal Behaviour, vol. 115 (2016): 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.03.007.
Google Scholar
Okanoya, Kazuo, Naoko Tokimoto, Noriko Kumazawa, Sayaka Hihara i Atsushi Iriki. „Tool-Use Training in a Species of Rodent: The Emergence of an Optimal Motor Strategy and Functional Understanding”. PLOS ONE, vol. 3 (3) (2008): e1860. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001860.
Google Scholar
O’Keefe, John, i Lynn Nadel. The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.
Google Scholar
Palagi, Elisabetta, Giada Cordoni, Elisa Demuru i Marc Bekoff. „Fair Play and Its Connection with Social Tolerance, Reciprocity and the Ethology of Peace”. Behaviour, vol. 153 (9–11) (2016): 1195–1216. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003336.
Google Scholar
Panfil, Kelsey, Carrie Bailey, Ian Davis, Anne Mains i Kimberly Kirkpatrick. „A Time-based Intervention to Treat Impulsivity in Male and Female Rats”. Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 379 (2020): 112316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112316.
Google Scholar
Panksepp, Jaak. „Affective Consciousness: Core Emotional Feelings in Animals and Humans”. Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 14 (1) (2005): 30–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2004.10.004.
Google Scholar
Panksepp, Jaak. „Affective Neuroscience of the Emotional BrainMind: Evolutionary Perspectives and Implications for Understanding Depression”. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 12 (2010): 533–545. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2010.12.4/jpanksepp.
Google Scholar
Panksepp, Jaak. Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Google Scholar
Panksepp, Jaak, i Lucy Biven. The Archaeology of Mind: Neuroevolutionary Origins of Human Emotions. Foreword by Daniel J. Siegel. New York: W.W. Norton & Co, 2012.
Google Scholar
Panksepp, Jaak, i Jeff Burgdorf. „’Laughing’ Rats and the Evolutionary Antecedents of Human Joy?” Physiology & Behavior, vol. 79 (3) (2003): 533–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(03)00159-8.
Google Scholar
Panksepp, Jaak, i Jules B. Panksepp. „Toward a Cross-species Understanding of Empathy”. Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 36 (8) (2013): 2013–2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2013.04.009.
Google Scholar
Panoz-Brown, Danielle, et al. „Replay of Episodic Memories in the Rat”. Current Biology, vol. 28 (10) (2018): 1628–1634.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.04.006.
Google Scholar
Parellada, Ricardo. „Conceptual Analysis and Empirical Observations of Animal Minds”. Philosophia, vol. 49 (2021): 2197–2210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-021-00336-4.
Google Scholar
Paul, Elizabeth S., Shlomi Sher, Marco Tamietto, Piotr Winkielman i Michael T. Mendl. „Towards a Comparative Science of Emotion: Affect and Consciousness in Humans and Animals”. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 108 (2020): 749–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.11.014.
Google Scholar
Peck, Sara, Jillian M. Rung, Jay E. Hinnenkamp i Gregory J. Madden, „Reducing Impulsive Choice: VI. Delay-Exposure Training Reduces Aversion to Delay-Signaling Stimuli”. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, vol. 34 (1) (2020): 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000495.
Google Scholar
Peters, Michael A. „Giorgio Agamben’s Homo Sacer Project”. Educational Philosophy and Theory, vol. 46 (4) (2014): 327–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2014.900313.
Google Scholar
Peterson, Jennifer R., i Kimberly Kirkpatrick. „The Effects of a Time-based Intervention on Experienced Middle-Aged Rats”. Behavioural Processes, vol. 133 (2016): 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2016.11.002.
Google Scholar
Piłat, Robert. „Podmiot jako prospektywna racjonalność. Filozoficzne pojęcie podmiotu w świetle teorii decyzji”. W: Podejmowanie decyzji. Pojęcia, teorie, kontrowersje. Pod redakcją Andrzeja Dąbrowskiego, Andrew Schumanna i Jana Woleńskiego, 23–50. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press, 2015.
Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. Zmierzch przemocy. Lepsza strona naszej natury. Przekład Tomasz Bieroń. Poznań: Zysk i S-ka, 2011.
Google Scholar
Polowczyk, Jan. Elements of Behavioral Economics in the Works of Adam Smith. 2010. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296914806_ELEMENTS_OF_BEHAVIORAL_ECONOMICS_IN_THE_WORKS_OF_ADAM_SMITH (dostęp: 11.11.2020).
Google Scholar
Poor, William. „Meet DeepSqueak, an Algorithm Built to Decode Ultrasonic Rat Squeaks”. The Verge. Ferbuary 19, 2019. https://www.theverge.com/science/2019/2/19/18225564/animal-research-rat-ai-science-software-automation-deepsqueak (dostęp: 22.11.2020).
Google Scholar
Posadas-Andrews, Astrid, i Timothy J. Roper. „Social Transmission of Food-Preferences in Adult Rats”. Animal Behaviour, vol. 31 (1) (1983): 265–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(83)80196-1.
Google Scholar
Premack, David, i Brian Anglin. „On the Possibilities of Self-control in Man and Animals”. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, vol. 81 (2) (1973): 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034492.
Google Scholar
Preston, Stephanie D., i Frans B.M. de Waal. „Empathy: Its Ultimate and Proximate Bases”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 25 (1) (2002): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02000018.
Google Scholar
Prétôt, Laurent, i Sarah F. Brosnan. „The Evolution of Morality: A Comparative Approach”. W The Moral Brain. Edited by Jean Decety, 3–18. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 2015.
Google Scholar
Prince, Alaina, Eric S. Murphy i Gwen Lupfer. „Effects of Food Restriction and Pre-Training Length on Delay Discounting in Male Wistar Rats”. The Psychological Record, vol. 70 (1) (2020): 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-019-00371-4.
Google Scholar
Prinz, Jesse. „Against Empathy”. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, vol. 49 (1) (2011): 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.2011.00069.x.
Google Scholar
Prinz, Jesse. „The Emotional Basis of Moral Judgments”. Philosophical Explorations, vol. 9 (1) (2006): 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13869790500492466.
Google Scholar
Prinz, Jesse. The Emotional Construction of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Google Scholar
Prinz, Jesse J. „Emocje jako ucieleśnione oceny”. W Formy aktywności umysłu. Ujęcia kognitywistyczne. Emocje, percepcja, świadomość. Pod redakcją Andrzeja Klawitera, 37–72. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 2008.
Google Scholar
Prinz, Jesse J. Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of Emotion. Oxford–New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Google Scholar
Probucka, Dorota. Prawa zwierząt. Kraków: Universitas, 2015.
Google Scholar
Puckett, Emily E., Jane Park, Matthew Combs, Michael J. Blum, Juliet E. Bryant, Adalgisa Caccone, Federico Costa et al. „Global Population Divergence and Admixture of the Brown Rat (Rattus norvegicus)”. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 283 (1841) (2016): 20161762. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.1762.
Google Scholar
Quinn, Laleh K., et al. „When Rats Rescue Robots”. Animal Behavior and Cognition, vol. 5 (4) (2018): 368–379. https://doi.org/10.26451/abc.05.04.04.2018.
Google Scholar
Rachlin, Howard. The Science of Self-Control. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2004.
Google Scholar
Reid, Alliston K., i Paige G. Bolton Swafford. „Reduced Frequency of Knowledge of Results Enhances Acquisition of Skills in Rats as in Humans”. Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00846.
Google Scholar
Reinhold, Annika Stefanie, Juan Ignacio Sanguinetti-Scheck, Konstantin Hartmann i Michael Brecht. „Behavioral and Neural Correlates of Hide-and-Seek in Rats”. Science, vol. 365 (6458) (2019): 1180–1183. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax4705.
Google Scholar
Renda, C. Renee, Jeffrey S. Stein i Gregory J. Madden. „Impulsive Choice Predicts Poor Working Memory in Male Rats”. PLOS ONE, vol. 9 (4) (2014): e93263. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093263.
Google Scholar
Renda, C. Renee, Jeffrey S. Stein i Gregory J. Madden. „Working-Memory Training: Effects on Delay Discounting in Male Long Evans Rats”. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, vol. 103 (1) (2015): 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.115.
Google Scholar
Rice, G.E., i P. Gainer. „’Altruism’ in the Albino Rat”. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, vol. 55 (1962): 123–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042276.
Google Scholar
Richter, Curt P. „On the Phenomenon of Sudden Death in Animals and Man”. Psychosomatic Medicine, vol. 19 (1957): 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-195705000-00004.
Google Scholar
Rollin, Bernard E. „The Regulation of Animal Research and the Emergence of Animal Ethics: A Conceptual History”. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, vol. 27 (4) (2006): 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-006-9007-8.
Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Matthew, Tony Zhang, Pietro Perona i Markus Meister. „Mice in a Labyrinth Show Rapid Learning, Sudden Insight, and Efficient Exploration”. eLife, vol. 10 (2021): e66175. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.66175.
Google Scholar
Rottschaefer, William A. „Moral Agency and Moral Learning: Transforming Metaethics from a First to a Second Philosophy Enterprise”. Behavior and Philosophy, vol. 37 (2009): 195–216.
Google Scholar
Rowlands, Mark. „Moral Subjects”. W The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Animal Minds. Edited by Kristin Andrews, Jacob Beck, 469–474. New York: Routledge, 2017.
Google Scholar
Rowlands, Mark. Can Animals Be Moral? Reprint ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Google Scholar
Rozin, Paul, Jonathan Haidt, i Clark McCauley. „Disgust”. W Handbook of Emotions. Edited by Lisa Feldman Barrett, Michael Lewis, Jeannette M. Haviland-Jones, 815–834. London: The Guilford Press, 2016.
Google Scholar
Rutte, Claudia, i Michael Taborsky. „Generalized Reciprocity in Rats”. PLoS Biology, vol. 5 (7) (2007): e196. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050196.
Google Scholar
Sapolsky, Robert M. Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst. London: Vintage, 2018.
Google Scholar
Sapolsky, Robert M. Zachowuj się. Jak biologia wydobywa z nas to, co najgorsze, i to, co najlepsze. Tłumaczył Piotr Szymczak. Poznań: Media Rodzina, 2021.
Google Scholar
Sapontzis, S.F. „Are Animals Moral Beings?” American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 17 (1) (1980): 45–52.
Google Scholar
Sato, Nobuya, Ling Tan, Kazushi Tate i Maya Okada. „Rats Demonstrate Helping Behavior toward a Soaked Conspecific”. Animal Cognition, vol. 18 (5) (2015): 1039–1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0872-2.
Google Scholar
Scheenberger, Karin, Melanie Dietz i Michael Taborsky. „Reciprocal Cooperation between Unrelated Rats Depends on Cost to Donor and Benefit to Recipient”. BMC Evolutionary Biology, vol. 12 (41) (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-12-41.
Google Scholar
Schetz, Adriana. „Nie(neo)behawiorystyczne teorie uczenia się ludzi i innych zwierząt”. Przegląd Filozoficzny – Nowa Seria, R. 24, nr 2 (94) (2015): 417–429.
Google Scholar
Schmid, Boris V., Ulf Büntgen, W. Ryan Easterday, Christian Ginzler, Lars Walløe, Barbara Bramanti i Nils Ch. Stenseth. „Climate-Driven Introduction of the Black Death and Successive Plague Reintroductions into Europe”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 112 (10) (2015): 3020–3025. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1412887112.
Google Scholar
Schnell, Anna Elisabeth, Gert Van den Bergh, Ben Vermaercke, Kim Gijbels, Christophe Bossens i Hans Op de Beeck. „Face Categorization and Behavioral Templates in Rats”. Journal of Vision, vol. 19 (14) (2019): 9. https://doi.org/10.1167/19.14.9.
Google Scholar
Schweinfurth, Manon K. „The Social Life of Norway Rats (Rattus norvegicus)”. eLife, vol. 9 (2020): e54020. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54020.
Google Scholar
Schweinfurth, Manon K., Jonathan Aeschbacher, Massimiliano Santi i Michael Taborsky. „Male Norway Rats Cooperate According to Direct but Not Generalized Reciprocity Rules”. Animal Behaviour, vol. 152 (2019): 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.03.015.
Google Scholar
Schweinfurth, Manon K., Binia Stieger i Michael Taborsky. „Experimental Evidence for Reciprocity in Allogrooming among Wild-Type Norway Rats”. Scientific Reports, vol. 7 (1) (2017): 4010. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03841-3.
Google Scholar
Schweinfurth, Manon K., i Michael Taborsky. „Norway Rats (Rattus norvegicus) Communicate Need, Which Elicits Donation of Food”. Journal of Comparative Psychology, vol. 132 (2) (2018): 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000102.
Google Scholar
Schweinfurth, Manon K., i Michael Taborsky. „Reciprocal Trading of Different Commodities in Norway Rats”. Current Biology, vol. 28 (4) (2018): 594–599.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.058.
Google Scholar
Scott, Benjamin B., Christine M. Constantinople, Athena Akrami, Timothy D. Hanks, Carlos D. Brody i David W. Tank. „Fronto-Parietal Cortical Circuits Encode Accumulated Evidence with a Diversity of Timescales”. Neuron, vol. 95 (2) (2017): 385-398.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.013.
Google Scholar
Sebo, Jeff. „Agency and Moral Status”. Journal of Moral Philosophy, vol. 14 (1) (2017): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-46810046.
Google Scholar
Sevillano, Verónica, i Susan T. Fiske. „Warmth and Competence in Animals”. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 46 (5) (2016): 276–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12361.
Google Scholar
Silverman, J.L., P.T. Gastrell, M.N. Karras, M. Solomon i J.N. Crawley. „Cognitive Abilities on Transitive Inference Using a Novel Touchscreen Technology for Mice”. Cerebral Cortex, vol. 25 (5) (2015): 1133–1142. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht293.
Google Scholar
Simola, Nicola, i Sylvie Granon. „Ultrasonic Vocalizations as a Tool in Studying Emotional States in Rodent Models of Social Behavior and Brain Disease”. Neuropharmacology, vol. 159 (2019): 107420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.11.008.
Google Scholar
Siviy, Stephen M. „Basal Ganglia Involvement in the Playfulness of Juvenile Rats”. Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 97 (12) (2019): 1521–1527. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24475.
Google Scholar
Stach, Ryszard. Sumienie i mózg. O wewnętrznym regulatorze zachowań moralnych. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 2012.
Google Scholar
Stach, Ryszard, i Stach-Borejko Anna. Empatia i mózg. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 2016.
Google Scholar
Steiner, Adam P., i A. David Redish. „Behavioral and Neurophysiological Correlates of Regret in Rat Decision-Making on a Neuroeconomic Task”. Nature Neuroscience, vol. 17 (7) (2014): 995–1002. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3740.
Google Scholar
Steiner, Adam P., i A. David Redish. „The Road Not Taken: Neural Correlates of Decision Making in Orbitofrontal Cortex”. Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 6 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00131.
Google Scholar
Stevens, Jeffrey, i Ian Gilby. „A Conceptual Framework for Non-Kin Food Sharing: Timing and Currency of Benefits”. Jeffrey Stevens Papers & Publications. January 1, 2004. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/psychstevens/10.
Google Scholar
Stieger, Binia, Manon Karin Schweinfurth i Michael Taborsky. „Reciprocal Allogrooming among Unrelated Norway Rats (Rattus Norvegicus) Is Affected by Previously Received Cooperative, Affiliative and Aggressive Behaviours”. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, vol. 17 (2017): 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2406-1.
Google Scholar
Suhler, Christopher L., i Patricia S. Churchland. „Control: Conscious and Otherwise”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 13 (8) (2009): 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.010.
Google Scholar
Sweis, Brian M., Mark J. Thomas i A. David Redish. „Mice Learn to Avoid Regret”. PLOS Biology, vol. 16 (6) (2018): e2005853. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005853.
Google Scholar
Sweis, Brian M., Samantha V. Abram, Brandy J. Schmidt, Kelsey D. Seeland, Angus W. MacDonald, Mark J. Thomas i A. David Redish. „Sensitivity to ‘Sunk Costs’ in Mice, Rats, and Humans”. Science, vol. 361 (6398) (2018): 178–181. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar8644.
Google Scholar
Szymków, Aleksandra. Umysł uwolniony. O poznaniu zakorzenionym w ciele i świecie społecznym. Warszawa: Scholar, 2018.
Google Scholar
Taborsky, Michael, Joachim G. Frommen i Christina Riehl. „Correlated Pay-offs Are Key to Cooperation”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 371 (1687) (2016): 20150084. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0084.
Google Scholar
Tachibana, Ryosuke O., Kouta Kanna, Shota Okabe, Kohta I. Kobayasi i Kazuo Okanoya. „USVSEG: A Robust Method for Segmentation of Ultrasonic Vocalizations in Rodents”. PLOS ONE, vol. 15 (2020): e0228907. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228907.
Google Scholar
Takahashi, Makoto, Tomokazu Ushitani i Kazuo Fujita. „Inference Based on Transitive Relation in Tree Shrews (Tupaia Belangeri) and Rats (Rattus Norvegicus) on a Spatial Discrimination Task”. The Psychological Record, vol. 58 (2) (2008): 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395612.
Google Scholar
Tanabe, Sean, Zirui Huang, Jun Zhang, Yali Chen, Stuart Fogel, Julien Doyon, Jinsong Wu et al. „Altered Global Brain Signal during Physiologic, Pharmacologic, and Pathologic States of Unconsciousness in Humans and Rats”. Anesthesiology, vol. 132 (6) (2020): 1392–1406. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000003197.
Google Scholar
Tang Yan, et al. „Social Touch Promotes Interfemale Communication via Activation of Parvocellular Oxytocin Neurons”. Nature Neuroscience, vol. 23 (9) (2020): 1125–1137. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-0674-y.
Google Scholar
Templer, Victoria L. „Slow Progress with the Most Widely Used Animal Model: Ten Years of Metacognition Research in Rats, 2009–2019”. Animal Behavior and Cognition, vol. 6 (4) (2019): 273–277. https://doi.org/10.26451/abc.06.04.07.2019.
Google Scholar
Terkel, Joseph. „Cultural Transmission of Feeding Behavior in the Black Rat (Rattus rattus)”. W Social Learning in Animals: The Roots of Culture. Edited by Cecilia M. Heyes, Bennett G. Galef Jr., 17–47. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012273965-1/50003-0.
Google Scholar
Thor, D.H., i W.R. Holloway. „Social Memory of the Male Laboratory Rat”. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, vol. 96 (6) (1982): 1000–1006. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.96.6.1000.
Google Scholar
Tolman, Edward. Zachowanie celowe u zwierząt i ludzi. [Przetłumaczył z angielskiego Józef Radzicki]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 1995.
Google Scholar
Tolman, Edward Chace, i Charles H. Honzik. „Introduction and Removal of Reward, and Maze Performance in Rats”. University of California Publications in Psychology, vol. 4 (1930): 257–275.
Google Scholar
Trojan, Maciej. Na tropie zwierzęcego umysłu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, 2013.
Google Scholar
Tu, Wenyu, Zilu Ma, Yuncong Ma, David Dopfel i Nanyin Zhang. „Suppressing Anterior Cingulate Cortex Modulates Default Mode Network and Behavior in Awake Rats”. Cerebral Cortex, vol. 31 (1) (2021): 312–323. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa227.
Google Scholar
Uexküll, Jakob von. „A Stroll Through the Worlds of Animals and Man”. W Instinctive Behavior. The Development of a Modern Concept. Translated and edited by Claire H. Chiller. Introduction by Karl S. Lashley, 5–80. New York: International Universities Press, 1934. Pobrano z: https://monoskop.org/images/1/1d/Uexkuell_Jakob_von_A_Stroll_Through_the_Worlds_of_Animals_and_Men_A_Picture_Book_of_Invisible_Worlds.pdf (28.11.2022).
Google Scholar
Urbaniak, Marcin. „Dlaczego zwierzęta coś wiedzą?” Filozofia i Nauka. Studia Filozoficzne i Interdyscyplinarne, nr 5 (2017): 253–269.
Google Scholar
Uzefovsky, Florina, Idan Shalev, S. Israel, S. Edelman, Y. Raz, David Mankuta, Ariel Knafo-Noam i Richard Ebstein. „Oxytocin Receptor and Vasopressin Receptor 1a Genes Are Respectively Associated with Emotional and Cognitive Empathy”. Hormones and Behavior, vol. 67 (2014): 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.11.007.
Google Scholar
Vale, Gillian L., i Sarah F. Brosnan. „Inequity Aversion”. W Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior. Edited by Jennifer Vonk, Todd Shackelford, 1–12. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1084-1.
Google Scholar
Van de Cruys, Sander. „Affective Value in the Predictive Mind”. W Philosophy and Predictive Processing: 24. Edited by Thomas K. Metzinger, Wanja Wiese, 1–21. Frankfurt am Main: MIND Group, 2017. https://doi.org/0.15502/978395857325.
Google Scholar
Vanderschuren, Louk J.M.J., E.J. Marijke Achterberg i Viviana Trezza. „The Neurobiology of Social Play and Its Rewarding Value in Rats”. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 70 (2016): 86–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.025.
Google Scholar
Vasconcelos, Marco. „Transitive Inference in Non-human Animals: An Empirical and Theoretical Analysis”. Behavioural Processes, vol. 78 (3) (2008): 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2008.02.017.
Google Scholar
Venniro, Marco, i Sam A. Golden. „Taking Action: Empathy and Social Interaction in Rats”. Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 45 (7) (2020): 1081–1082. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-019-0596-0.
Google Scholar
Venniro, Marco, Trinity I. Russell, Michelle Zhang i Yavin Shaham. „Operant Social Reward Decreases Incubation of Heroin Craving in Male and Female Rats”. Biological Psychiatry, Striatal Mechanisms in Addiction, vol. 86 (11) (2019): 848–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.05.018.
Google Scholar
Venniro, Marco, Michelle Zhang, Daniele Caprioli, Jennifer K. Hoots, Sam A. Golden, Conor Heins, Marisela Morales, David H. Epstein i Yavin Shaham. „Volitional Social Interaction Prevents Drug Addiction in Rat Models”. Nature Neuroscience, vol. 21 (11) (2018): 1520–1529. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0246-6.
Google Scholar
Vermaercke, Ben, Elsy Cop, Sam Willems, Rudi D’Hooge i Hans P. Op de Beeck. „More Complex Brains Are Not Always Better: Rats Outperform Humans in Implicit Category-based Generalization by Implementing a Similarity-based Strategy”. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 21 (4) (2014): 1080–1086. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0579-9.
Google Scholar
Vinken, Kasper, Ben Vermaercke i Hans P. Op de Beeck. „Visual Categorization of Natural Movies by Rats”. The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 34 (32) (2014): 10645–10658. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3663-13.2014.
Google Scholar
Vöröslakos, Mihály, Yuichi Takeuchi, Kitti Brinyiczki, Tamás Zombori, Azahara Oliva, Antonio Fernández-Ruiz, Gábor Kozák et al. „Direct Effects of Transcranial Electric Stimulation on Brain Circuits in Rats and Humans”. Nature Communications, vol. 9 (1) (2018): 483–493. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-02928-3.
Google Scholar
Waal, Frans B.M. de. Bystre zwierzę. Czy jesteśmy dość mądrzy, aby zrozumieć mądrość zwierząt? Z rysunkami wykonanymi przez autora. Tłumaczenie Łukasz Lamża. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press, 2019.
Google Scholar
Waal, Frans B.M. de. Małpy i filozofowie. Skąd pochodzi moralność? Komentarze Robert Wright, Christine M. Korsgaard, Philip Kitcher, Peter Singer. Wstęp i opracowanie Stephen Macedo, Josiah Ober. Tłumaczenie Bartosz Brożek, Michał Furman. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press, 2019.
Google Scholar
Waal, Frans B.M. de. Ostatni uścisk mamy. Emocje zwierząt i co one mówią o nas samych. Tłumaczenie Radosław Kosarzycki. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press, 2019.
Google Scholar
Waal, Frans B.M. de. „What Is an Animal Emotion?: What Is an Animal Emotion?” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1224 (1) (2011): 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05912.x.
Google Scholar
Waal, Frans B.M. de. Wiek empatii. Jak natura uczy nas życzliwości. Tłumaczenie Łukasz Lamża. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press, 2019.
Google Scholar
Waal, Frans B.M. de, i Stephanie D. Preston. „Mammalian Empathy: Behavioural Manifestations and Neural Basis”. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 18 (2017): 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.72.
Google Scholar
Wagemans, Fieke M.A., Mark J. Brandt i Marcel Zeelenberg. „Disgust Sensitivity Is Primarily Associated With Purity-based Moral Judgments”. Emotion, vol. 18 (2) (2018): 277–289.
Google Scholar
Waldmann, Michael R., Martina Schmid, Jared Wong i Aaron P. Blaisdell. „Rats Distinguish between Absence of Events and Lack of Evidence in Contingency Learning”. Animal Cognition, vol. 15 (5) (2012): 979–990. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10071-012-0524-8.
Google Scholar
Wang, Maya Zhe, i Benjamin Y. Hayden. „Latent Learning, Cognitive Maps, and Curiosity”. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, vol. 38 (2021): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.06.003.
Google Scholar
Watanabe, Shigeru. „Social Inequality Aversion in Mice: Analysis with Stress-Induced Hyperthermia and Behavioral Preference”. Learning and Motivation, vol. 59 (2017): 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2017.08.002.
Google Scholar
Watanabe, Shigeru, i Stan Kuczaj, eds. Emotions of Animals and Humans: Comparative Perspectives. Tokyo–New York: Springer, 2012.
Google Scholar
Weiss, Omri, Alex Dorfman, Tamar Ram, Pazit Zadicario i David Eilam. „Rats Do Not Eat Alone in Public: Food-Deprived Rats Socialize Rather than Competing for Baits”. PLOS ONE, vol. 12 (3) (2017): e0173302. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173302.
Google Scholar
Weiss, Virginia G., Lindsey R. Hammerslag i Michael T. Bardo. „Effect of a Social Peer on Risky Decision Making in Male Sprague Dawley Rats”. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, vol. 28 (1) (2020): 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000298.
Google Scholar
Wesoły, Marian Andrzej. „Księga Arystotelesa o dyspozycjach dianoetycznych (intelektualnych). »Etyka nikomachejska« VI”. Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna, T. 8, nr 1 (2019): 6–17. https://doi.org/10.14746/fped.2018.7.2.2019.8.1.1.
Google Scholar
Wilson, A. George, Matthew J. Pizzo i Jonathon D. Crystal. „Event-based Prospective Memory in the Rat”. Current Biology, vol. 23 (12) (2013): 1089–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.067.
Google Scholar
Wilson, David Sloan. Does Altruism Exist?: Culture, Genes, and the Welfare of Others. Reprint ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2016.
Google Scholar
Wilson, David Sloan. This View of Life: Completing the Darwinian Revolution. New York: Pantheon, 2019.
Google Scholar
Wilson, Edward O. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1975.
Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Dociekania filozoficzne. Przeł., wstępem poprzedził i przypisami opatrzył Bogusław Wolniewicz. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 2012.
Google Scholar
Xie, Weizhen, Stephen Campbell i Weiwei Zhang. „Working Memory Capacity Predicts Individual Differences in Social-Distancing Compliance during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117 (30) (2020): 17667–17674. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008868117.
Google Scholar
Yakura, Tomiko, Hiroki Yokota, Mika Ohmichi, Takashi Nakano i Munekazu Naito. „Visual Recognition of Mirror, Video-Recorded, and Still Images in Rats”. PLOS ONE, vol. 13 (3) (2018): e0194215. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194215.
Google Scholar
Yamagishi, Atsuhito, Maya Okada, Masatoshi Masuda i Nobuya Sato. „Oxytocin Administration Modulates Rats’ Helping Behavior Depending on Social Context”. Neuroscience Research, vol. 153 (2020): 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2019.04.001.
Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Aaron, Karen Jones i Mark Timmons, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Moral Epistemology. New York–London: Routledge, 2019.
Google Scholar
No. 2 (10) (2022)
Published: 2022-12-30
10.31261/ZOOPHILOLOGICA
English
Русский
Język Polski