Non est qui ignoret magnam vel immo maiorem partem nupturientium matrimonium contrahere cum animo prolem nascituram vel quoad tempus nascendi vel quoad numerum filiorum statuere. Limitatio prolis est plurimis coniugibus res magni momenti ob conditiones physicas, oeconomicas, psychologicas vel sociales. Inde oriuntur non solum problemata ordinis moralis, nostrum propositum directe non spectantes, sed etiam quaestiones directe c. 1086 § 2 tangentes. Ad mentem enim c. 1086 § 2 qui positivo actu voluntatis excludat essentiales proprietates matrimonii vel omne ius ad actum coniugalem, invalide contrahit. Hoc in casu habetur simulatio sic dicta partialis.
Ex dispositionibus c. 1086 § 2 de simulatione partiali gignitur quaestio de validitate matrimonii nupturientium, qui tempus vel numerum prolis nasciturae statuunt. Ad quaestionem hanc solvendam distinguitur inter voluntatem non se obligandi et voluntatem non implendi, inter exclusionem iuris et usum iuris. Matrimonium in primo tantum casu est invalidum. Sed nupturientes plerumque distinctionem hanc non cognoscunt. Numquam dicunt: ius ad prolem excludo, sed dicunt tantum: prolem nunc generare non possumus. An hoc in casu agatur de iure excluso vel usu, non est facile determinare et res est ex toto complexu causae discernenda. Attamen distinctio inter exclusionem iuris et limitationem usus iuris sustentatur, quia secus dispositiones de simulatione partiali fatales essent pro sacro vinculo matrimoniali. Theoretice enim ex c. 1086 § 2 patet exclusionem etiam temporaneam generationis prolis secumtrahere nullitatem matrimonii.
Eiusdem naturae difficultates vidimus quoad exclusionem aliorum bo- norum matrimonii. Non enim solum is qui absolute sibi reservat ius faciendi divortium civile, sed etiam is qui divortium hypothetice, si casus ferat, intendit, invalide contrahit. Permulti catholici matrimonium contrahunt illum felix fore sperantes sed simul scientes illos matrimonio eorum infausto ab divortio et pro occasione novo matrimonio scilicet civili tantum non abhorrituros.
In articulo examinatur doctrina de matrimonio constitutionis Gaudium et spes et conclusiones dispositiones iuris et doctrinam de consensu matrimoniali spectantes. In effectu proponitur revisio c. 1086 § 2 hoc in sensu, ut nullitas matrimonii tantum a simulatione totali causetur.
Bona vinculi et bonum alterius partis titulo nullitatis ex dolosa deceptione tutanda sunt.
Download files
Citation rules
Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
Vol. 2 (1969)
Published: 2021-03-10
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
English
Język Polski