Literatura
Google Scholar
Arcusa S., Sprenkle-Hyppolite S., Snapshot of the carbon dioxide removal certification and standards ecosystem (2021–2022), „Climate Policy” 2022, vol. 22, issue 9/10, s. 1319–1332, https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2022.2094308.
Google Scholar
Bäckstrand K., Lövbrand E., Planting trees to mitigate climate change: Contested discourses of ecological modernization, green governmentality and civic environmentalism, „Global Environmental Politics” 2006, vol. 6, issue 1, s. 50–75, https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2006.6.1.50.
Google Scholar
Carton W. et al., Negative emissions and the long history of carbon removal, „WIREs Climate Change” 2020, vol. 11, issue 6, s. 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.671.
Google Scholar
Ciechanowicz-McLean J., Instrumenty prawne ochrony klimatu przed i w Europejskim Zielonym Ładzie, „Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze” 2021, nr 3, s. 9–20, https://doi.org/10.26881/gsp.2021.3.01.
Google Scholar
Ejdys J., Szpilko D., European Green Deal – research directions: A systematic literature review, „Economics and Environment” 2022, vol. 81, no. 2, s. 8–38, https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2022.81.2.455.
Google Scholar
Fuhrman J. et al., Diverse carbon dioxide removal approaches could reduce impacts on the energy – water – land system, „Nature Climate Change” 2023, vol. 13, issue 4, s. 341–350, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01604-9.
Google Scholar
Ghaleigh N.S., Macinante J., Déjà vu all over again: Carbon dioxide removals (CDR) and legal liability, „Journal of Environmental Law” 2023, vol. 35, issue 3, s. 377–400, https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqad022.
Google Scholar
Honegger M., Toward the effective and fair funding of CO2 removal technologies, „Nature Communications” 2023, vol. 14, article 534, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36199-4.
Google Scholar
Keith D.W., Why capture CO2 from the atmosphere?, „Science” 2009, vol. 325, issue 5948, s. 1654–1655, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1175680.
Google Scholar
Köhler P., Hartmann J., Wolf-Gladrow D.A., Geoengineering potential of artificially enhanced silicate weathering of olivine, „Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences” 2010, vol. 107, no. 47, s. 20228–20233, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1000545107.
Google Scholar
Kollmuss A., Schneider L., Zhezherin V., Has Joint Implementation reduced GHG emissions? Lessons learned for the design of carbon market mechanisms, Working Paper no. 2015-07, Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm 2015, SEI [online], https://mediamanager.sei.org/documents/Publications/Climate/SEI-WP-2015-07-JI-lessons-for-carbon-mechs.pdf [dostęp: 20.12.2023].
Google Scholar
Lehmann J., Ahandful of carbon, „Nature” 2007, no. 447, s. 143–144, https://doi.org/10.1038/447143a.
Google Scholar
Lundberg L., Fridahl M., The missing piece in policy for carbon dioxide removal: Reverse auctions as an interim solution, „Discover Energy” 2022, vol. 2, article 3, https://doi.org/10.1007/s43937-022-00008-8.
Google Scholar
Nabuurs G.J. et al., Effects of the EU-LULUCF regulation on the use of biomass for bio-energy,
Google Scholar
Wageningen Environmental Research, Report 2886, Wageningen 2018, Wageningen University & Research [online], https://edepot.wur.nl/449788 [dostęp: 20.12.2023].
Google Scholar
Osaka S., Bellamy R., Castree N., Framing „nature-based” solutions to climate change, „WIREs Climate Change” 2021, vol. 12, issue 5, article e729, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.729.
Google Scholar
Przybojewska I., Greenwashing w kontekście unormowań prawnych, „Prawne Problemy Górnictwa i Ochrony Środowiska” 2022, nr 1, s. 1–26, https://doi.org/10.31261/PPGOS.2022.01.07.
Google Scholar
Przybojewska I., Instrumenty rynkowe w prawie ochrony środowiska Unii Europejskiej, Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2021.
Google Scholar
Przybojewska I., Mechanizm dostosowywania cen na granicach (CBAM) i stopniowa eliminacja bezpłatnych uprawnień emisyjnych dla sektorów zagrożonych ucieczką emisji w ramach EU ETS – czy gra jest warta świeczki?, „Prawne Problemy Górnictwa i Ochrony Środowiska” 2023, nr 2, s. 1–29, https://doi.org/10.31261/PPGOS.2023.02.02.
Google Scholar
Rickels W. et al., Integrating carbon dioxide removal into European emissions trading, „Frontiers in Climate” 2021, vol. 3, article 690023, https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.6900
Google Scholar
Schenuit F., Geden O., Carbon dioxide removal: Climbing up the EU climate policy agenda, w: Handbook on European Union climate change policy and politics, eds. T. Rayner et al., Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton 2023, s. 322–336, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789906981.
Google Scholar
Schuiling R.D., Krijgsman P., Enhanced silicate weathering: An effective and cheap tool to sequester CO2, „Climate Change” 2006, vol. 74, s. 349–354, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-005-3485-y.
Google Scholar
Scott V., Geden O., The challenge of carbon dioxide removal for EU policy-making, „Nature Energy” 2018, no. 3, s. 350–352, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0124-1.
Google Scholar
Sekera J. et al., Carbon dioxide removal: What’s worth doing? A biophysical and public need perspective, „PLOS Climate” 2023, no. 2, issue 2, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000124.
Google Scholar
Shaffer G., Long-term effectiveness and consequences of carbon dioxide sequestration, „Nature Geoscience” 2010, vol. 3, s. 464–467, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo896.
Google Scholar
Smith P. et al., Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions, „Nature Climate Change” 2016, vol. 6, issue 1, s. 42–50, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2870.
Google Scholar
Smith S. et al., State of carbon dioxide removal − 1st edition, OSF [online], 2023, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/W3B4Z.
Google Scholar
Ślażyńska-Kluczek D., Analiza greenwashingu w kontekście emisji długu zrównoważonego, „Przegląd Prawno-Ekonomiczny” 2023, nr 3, s. 81–100, https://doi.org/10.31743/ppe.16212.
Google Scholar
Źródła internetowe:
Google Scholar
IPCC, Annex I: Glossary, ed. J.B.R. Matthews, w: Global warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty, eds. V. Masson-Delmotte et al., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge–New York 2018, s. 541–562, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157940.008.
Google Scholar
IPCC, Summary for policymakers, w: Climate change 2022: Mitigation of climate change, the contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, eds. P.R. Shukla et al., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge–New York 2022, s. 1–48, IPCC [online], https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGIII_FullReport.pdf [dostęp: 20.12.2023].
Google Scholar
IPCC, Summary for policymakers, w: Climate change and land: An IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems, eds. P.R. Shukla et al., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge–New York 2019, s. 1–36, IPPC [online], https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/4/2022/11/SRCCL_SPM.pdf [dostęp: 20.12.2023].
Google Scholar
Krajowy Ośrodek Bilansowania i Zarządzania Emisjami, Propozycja nowych unijnych ram certyfikacji usuwania dwutlenku węgla, w: Raport z rynku CO2 , 2022, nr 129, s. 25–27, KOBiZE [online], https://www.kobize.pl/uploads/materialy/materialy_do_pobrania/raport_co2/2022/KOBiZE_Analiza_rynku_CO2_grudzie%C5%84_2022.pdf [dostęp: 20.12.2023].
Google Scholar
Register of Commission expert groups and other similar entities, European Commission [online], https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/expert-groups-register/screen/expert-groups/consult?lang=en&groupID=3861 [dostęp: 20.12.2023].
Google Scholar
Scherger S., Carbon farming: How big corporations are driving the EU’s carbon removals agenda, Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy [online], 28.11.2022, https://www.iatp.org/big-corporations-driving-eus-carbon-farming-agenda [dostęp: 20.12.2023].
Google Scholar