Received: 2026-03-07
Revised: 2026-04-07
Accepted: 2026-05-20
Published: 2026-09-11

Irenaeus of Lyons and the Valentinians in the dispute over the Public Character of Revelation

Łukasz Koszałka Logo ORCID

Abstract

The dispute over the nature of revelation was one of the significant theological debates of the second century. In the polemic between Irenaeus of Lyons and the representatives of the Valentinian school, two different models of understanding revelation emerge. Texts associated with the Valentinian tradition, especially the Gospel of Truth and the Tripartite Tractate, present revelation primarily as knowledge (gnosis) that overcomes ignorance and enables the discovery of humanity’s spiritual origin.
In Adversus haereses, Irenaeus opposes this view by presenting revelation as an event within the history of salvation accomplished in Christ and transmitted by the apostles to the entire Church. In his interpretation, revelation is not knowledge reserved for a select few but a reality preserved in the public tradition of the apostolic Churches, in their common rule of faith, and in episcopal succession. The polemic with the Valentinians thus leads to a clearer articulation of the conviction that Christian revelation has a historical and public character.

Download files

Citation rules

Koszałka, Łukasz. (2026). Irenaeus of Lyons and the Valentinians in the dispute over the Public Character of Revelation. Silesian Historical and Theological Studies, 59(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.31261/SSHT.2026.59.1.01

Cited by / Share

Vol. 59 No. 1 (2026)
Published: 2026-09-11


ISSN: 0137-3447
eISSN: 2956-6185

Publisher
Instytut Gość Media/Księgarnia św. Jacka

Licence CC Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies for proper operation, in order to use the portal fully you must accept cookies.