The perception of non-native phonological categories in adult-directed and infant-directed speech: An experimental study

Maciej Karpiński; Katarzyna Klessa

doi:10.31261/LOGOPEDIASILESIANA.2020.09.13

Published: 2020-12-29

No. 9 (2020)

The perception of non-native phonological categories in adult-directed and infant-directed speech: An experimental study

Maciej Karpiński

, Katarzyna Klessa

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.31261/LOGOPEDIASILESIANA.2020.09.13

Abstract

In the present study, we test whether adult listeners detect phonological contrasts faster and more accurately in non-native infant-directed speech (IDS) than in non-native adult-directed speech (ADS). 21 participants listened to pairs of speech signals and their task was to decide as quickly as possible whether the signals constitute the same or different words. Each pair of signals contained target vowels or consonants representing a certain category of contrast that was phonologically relevant in a given language but not in Polish, i.e., the native language of the participants of the listening test. The signals were presented in a random order, and each pair occurred in the material twice. Although we demonstrated significant acoustic-phonetic differences between the utterances realized in the IDS and ADS speaking styles, the listeners in our study were not significantly more accurate or faster in the identification of contrasts in either IDS or ADS stimuli.

Keywords:

infant-directed speech , native phonological categories , non-native phonological categories , L2 perception

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Karpiński, M., & Klessa, K. (2020). The perception of non-native phonological categories in adult-directed and infant-directed speech: An experimental study. Logopedia Silesiana, (9), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.31261/LOGOPEDIASILESIANA.2020.09.13

Cited by / Share

References

Adriaans, F., & Swingley, D. (2017). Prosodic Exaggeration within Infant-directed Speech: Consequences for Vowel Learnability. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141(5), 3070–3078.
Google Scholar

Best, C.T., McRoberts, G.W., & Goodell, E. (2001). Discrimination of Non-native Consonant Contrasts Varying in Perceptual Assimilation to the Listener’s Native Phonological System. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109(2), 775–794.
Google Scholar

Best, C.T., & Tyler, M.D. (2007). Nonnative and Second-language Speech Perception: Commonalities and Complementarities. In: O.-S. Bohn, M.J. Munro (eds.), Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege, vol. 1334. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Google Scholar

Bradlow, A.R., & Bent, T. (2008). Perceptual Adaptation to Non-native Speech. Cognition, 106(2), 707–729.
Google Scholar

Boer, B. de, & Kuhl, P.K. (2003). Investigating the Role of Infant-directed Speech with a Computer Model. Acoustic Research Letters Online, 4, 129–134.
Google Scholar

Brent, M.R., & Siskind, J.M. (2001). The Role of Exposure to Isolated Words in Early Vocabulary Development. Cognition, 81, B33–B44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00122-6.
Google Scholar

Cristià, A. (2010). Phonetic Enhancement of Sibilants in Infant-directed Speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(1), 424–434.
Google Scholar

Cristià, A. (2013). Input to Language: The Phonetics and Perception of Infant-directed Speech. Language and Linguistics Compass, 7, 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12015.
Google Scholar

Cristià, A., & Seidl, A. (2014). The Hyperarticulation Hypothesis of Infant-directed Speech. Journal of Child Language, 41, 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000912000669.
Google Scholar

Czoska, A., Klessa, K., Karpiński, M. (2015). Polish Infant Directed vs. Adult Directed Speech: Selected Acoustic-Phonetic Differences. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow, UK.
Google Scholar

Cooke, M., Garcia Lecumberri, M.L., & Barker, J. (2008). The Foreign Language Cocktail Party Problem: Energetic and Informational Masking Effects in Non-native Speech Perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(1), 414–427.
Google Scholar

Cooper, R.P., Abraham, J., Berman, S., & Staska, M. (1997). The Development of Infants’ Preference for Motherese. Infant Behavioral Development, 20, 477–488.
Google Scholar

Eaves, B.S., Jr., Feldman, N.H., Griffiths, T.L., & Shafto, P. (2016). Infant-directed Speech Is Consistent with Teaching. Psychological Review, 123, 758–771. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000031.
Google Scholar

Fernald, A., & Simon, T. (1984). Expanded Intonation Contours in Mothers’ Speech to Newborns. Developmental Psychology, 20(1), Jan 1984, 104–113.
Google Scholar

Fernald, A., Taeschner, T., Dunn, J., Papoušek, M., Boysson-Bardies, B.D., & Fukui, I. (1989). A Cross-language Study of Prosodic Modifications in Mothers’ and Fathers’ Speech to Preverbal Infants. Journal of Child Language, 16(3), 477–501.
Google Scholar

Flege, J.E., Bohn, O.S., & Jang, S. (1997). Effects of Experience on Non-native Speakers’ Production and Perception of English Vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 437–470.
Google Scholar

IBM Corp. Released 2019. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
Google Scholar

Jamieson, D.G., & Morosan, D.E. (1986). Training Non-native Speech Contrasts in Adults: Acquisition of the English /ð/ – /θ/ Contrast by Francophones. Perception & Psychophysics, 40(4), 205–215.
Google Scholar

Jusczyk, P.W., Houston, D.M., & Newsome, M. (1999). The Beginnings of Word Segmentation in English-learning Infants. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 159–207.
Google Scholar

Kilman, L., Zekveld, A., Hällgren, M., & Rönnberg, J. (2015). Native and Non-native Speech Perception by Hearing-impaired Listeners in Noise-and Speech Maskers. Trends in Hearing, (19). https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216515579127.
Google Scholar

Kitamura, C., Guellaï, B., & Kim, J. (2014). Motherese by Eye and Ear: Infants Perceive Visual Prosody in Point-line Displays of Talking Heads. PLOS ONE, 9(10), e111467. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111467.
Google Scholar

Klessa, K., Karpiński, M., & Czoska, A. (2015). Design, Structure, and Preliminary Analyses of a Speech Corpus of Infant Directed Speech (IDS) and Adult Directed Speech (ADS). Presented at 48th Annual Meeting of Societas Linguistica Europea (SLE). Leiden, The Netherlands.
Google Scholar

Kuhl, P.K., et al. (1997). Cross-language Analysis of Phonetic Units in Language Addressed to Infants. Science, 277(5326), 684–686.
Google Scholar

Kuhl, P.K., Tsao, F.M., & Liu, H.M. (2003). Foreign-language Experience in Infancy: Effects of Short Term Exposure and Social Interaction on Phonetic Learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(15), 9096–9101.
Google Scholar

Lecumberri, M.L.G., Cooke, M., & Cutler, A. (2010). Non-native Speech Perception in Adverse Conditions: A Review. Speech Communication, 52(11–12), 864–886.
Google Scholar

Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). OpenSesame: An Open-source, Graphical Experiment Builder for the Social Sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7.
Google Scholar

Mauch, M., & Dixon, S. (2014). pYIN: A Fundamental Frequency Estimator Using Probabilistic Threshold Distributions. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 659–663.
Google Scholar

Narayan, C.R., & McDermott, L.C. (2016). Speech Rate and Pitch Characteristics of Infant-directed Speech: Longitudinal and Cross-linguistic Observations. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 139(3), 1272–1281.
Google Scholar

Pajak, B., & Levy, R. (2014). The Role of Abstraction in Non-native Speech Perception. Journal of Phonetics, 46, 147–160.
Google Scholar

Polka, L. (1995). Linguistic Influences in Adult Perception of Non‐native Vowel Contrasts. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(2), 1286–1296.
Google Scholar

Saito, K., & Poeteren, K. van (2012). Pronunciation-specific Adjustment Strategies for Intelligibility in L2 Teacher Talk: Results and Implications of a Questionnaire Study. Language Awareness, 21(4), 369–385.
Google Scholar

Seery, A.M., Vogel-Farley, V., Tager-Flusberg, H., & Nelson, C.A. (2013). Atypical Lateralization of ERP Response to Native and Non-native Speech in Infants at Risk for Autism Spectrum Disorder. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 10–24.
Google Scholar

Thiessen, E.D., Hill, E.A., & Saffran, J.R. (2005). Infant-directed Speech Facilitates Word Segmentation. Infancy, 7(1), 53–71. DOI: 10.1207/s15327078in0701_5.
Google Scholar

Trainor, L.J., & Desjardins, R.N. (2002). Pitch Characteristics of Infant-directed Speech Affect Infants’ Ability to Discriminate Vowels. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 335. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196290.
Google Scholar

Uther, M., Knoll, M.A., & Burnham, D. (2007). Do You Speak E-NG-LI-SH? A Comparison of Foreigner- and Infant-directed Speech. Speech Communication, 49(1), 2–7.
Google Scholar

Zangl, R., & Mills, D.L. (2007). Increased Brain Activity to Infant-directed Speech in 6- and 13-month-old Infants. Infancy, 11, 31–62.
Google Scholar

No. 9 (2020)
Published: 2021-01-12

ISSN: 2300-5246

eISSN: 2391-4297

10.31261/LOGOPEDIASILESIANA

Publisher

Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego | University of Silesia Press

Submit