Published: 2015-12-23

What Is It Like to Be a Bat? Reflections upon the Reading of Thomas Nagel’s Essay

Dobrosława Wężowicz-Ziółkowska Logo ORCID

Abstract

The article asks questions about the human cognitive abilities – how it is to be an animal of a species
different from one’s own. Using as a basis the doubts of the philosopher Thomas Nagel, the author proceeds to discuss the standpoint of ethnologists Frans de Waal and Konrad Lorenz, who accept the limitations of the human cognitive apparatus and language, with the help of which we describe what we call the “animal.” The author suggests that the problem of contemporary humanities and animal studies lies not in anthropodenial, but in anthropomorphism, rooted in the centrism typical of our species, which seems impossible to overcome. The author also proposes a thesis that the way to overcome this issue is for people to gain knowledge about these limitations. This knowledge, supported by interspecies empathy, developed in the process of coevolution of animal species (humans being one of them), is the most effective tool of heuristics.

Citation rules

Wężowicz-Ziółkowska, D. (2015). What Is It Like to Be a Bat? Reflections upon the Reading of Thomas Nagel’s Essay. Zoophilologica. Polish Journal of Animal Studies, (1), 83–94. Retrieved from https://journals.us.edu.pl/index.php/ZOOPHILOLOGICA/article/view/4808

Zoophilologica – T.1 (2015) – Zwierzęce/Animalis

No. 1 (2015)
Published: 2016-08-14


ISSN: 2719-2687
eISSN: 2451-3849
Ikona DOI 10.31261/ZOOPHILOLOGICA

Publisher
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego | University of Silesia Press

This website uses cookies for proper operation, in order to use the portal fully you must accept cookies.