Akhtar, Sahar. „Animal pain and welfare: Can pain sometimes be worse for them than for us”. In The Oxford handbook of animal ethics. Eds. Tom L. Beauchamp, Raymond Gillespie Frey, 495–518., 509. Oxford–New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Google Scholar

Alem, Sylvain, Clint J. Perry, Xingfu Zhu, Olli J. Loukola, Tomas Ingraham, Eric Søvik, and Lars Chittka. „Associative mechanisms allow for social learning and cultural transmission of string pulling in an insect”. PLoS Biol, no. 14(10) (2016), e1002564.
Google Scholar

Baracchi, David, and Luigi Baciadonna. „Insect sentience and the rise of a new inclusive ethics”. Animal Sentience 5(29) (2020), 18.
Google Scholar

Birch, Jonathan. „Animal sentience and the precautionary principle”. Animal Sentience, 2(16) (2017): 1.
Google Scholar

Broom, Donald M. „Cognitive ability and sentience: Which aquatic animals should be protected?”. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, no. 75(2) (2007): 99–108.
Google Scholar

Broom, Donald M. „The welfare of invertebrate animals such as insects, spiders, snails and worms”. In Animal Suffering: From science to Law, International Symposium. Eds. Thierry Auffret Van Der Kemp and Martine Lachance, 135–152. Paris: Editions Yvon Blais, 2013.
Google Scholar

Bruers Stijn. Born free and equal? On the ethical consistency of animal equality. Ghent, Belgium: Ghent University. Faculty of Arts and Philosophy, 2014.
Google Scholar

Carruthers, Peter. „Invertebrate minds: A challenge for ethical theory”. The Journal of Ethics, no. 11(3) (2007): 275–297.
Google Scholar

Churchland, Paul M. Matter and consciousness. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1988.
Google Scholar

De Grazia, David. „Self-awareness in animals”. In The philosophy of animal minds. Ed. Robert W. Lurz, 201–217. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Google Scholar

Descartes, René. Rozprawa o metodzie. Przekład Wanda Wojciechowska. Warszawa: PWN, 1981.
Google Scholar

Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Union
Google Scholar

(dostęp: 18. 02.2015).
Google Scholar

Dunayer, Joan. Speciesism. Derwood: Ryce Publishing, 2004.
Google Scholar

Dzwonkowska Dominika. „Znaczenie empatii i współczucia w trosce o jakość życia zwierząt”. W Dominika Dzwonkowska, Michał Latawiec, Dariusz Gzyra, Jacek Lejman, Mirosław Twardowski, Justyna Tymieniecka-Suchanek, Filozofia wobec świata zwierząt, 81–97. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego, 2015.
Google Scholar

Elwood, Robert W. „Assessing the Potential for Pain in Crustaceans and Other Invertebrates”. In The Welfare of Invertebrate Animals. Eds. Claudio Carere, and Jennifer Mather, 147. Cham: Springer, 2019.
Google Scholar

Elwood, Robert W., and Mark Briffa. „Information gathering and communication during agonistic encounters: a case study of hermit crabs”. Advances in the Study of Behavior, vol. 30 (2001): 53–97.
Google Scholar

Elżanowski, Andrzej. „Sprzedaż żywych ryb do spożycia jest niehumanitarna”. Życie Weterynaryjne, nr 94(4) (2019): 284–288.
Google Scholar

Faria, Catia, and Eze Paez. „It’s Splitsville: why animal ethics and environmental ethics are incompatible”. American Behavioral Scientist, no. 63(8) (2019): 1047–1060.
Google Scholar

Fischer, Bob, and Brendon M. Larson. „Collecting insects to conserve them: a call for ethical caution”. Insect Conservation and Diversity, no. 12 (3) (2019): 173–182.
Google Scholar

Fischer Marta Luciane, and Juliana Zacarkin Santos. „Ethical Conduct with Invertebrate Animals: Routes for Inclusive, Humanitarian, and Sustainable Education”. Curr World Environ, no. 16(3) (2021). https://bit.ly/2XAMmeb.
Google Scholar

Francione, Gary L. Animals as Persons: Essays on the Abolition of Animal Exploitation. New York: Columbia University Press, 2008.
Google Scholar

Galib, Shams M., Jingrui Sun, Sean D. Twiss, and Martyn C. Lucas. „Personality, density and habitat drive the dispersal of invasive crayfish”. Scientific Reports, no. 12(1) (2022): 1–12.
Google Scholar

Giurfa, Martin. „Behavioral and neural analysis of associative learning in the honeybee: a taste from the magic well”. Journal of comparative physiology A, no. 193(8) (2007): 801–824.
Google Scholar

Gzyra, Dariusz. „Teoria praw zwierząt Toma Regana a etyka środowiskowa”. W Dominika Dzwonkowska, Michał Latawiec, Dariusz Gzyra, Jacek Lejman, Mirosław Twardowski, Justyna Tymieniecka-Suchanek, Filozofia wobec świata zwierząt, 101–111. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego, 2015.
Google Scholar

Gzyra, Dariusz. „Zdolność do odczuwania w teorii praw zwierząt Toma Regana”. Przegląd Filozoficzny – Nowa Seria, nr 2 (2015): 431–445.
Google Scholar

Gzyra, Dariusz. „O krzywdzie odbierania życia. Głosy wybrane”. Zoophilologica. Polish Journal of Animal Studies, nr 5 (2019): 309–319.
Google Scholar

Hicks, Thurston Cleveland, Hjalmar S. Kühl, Christophe Boesch, Steph B. Menken, John Hart, Peter Roessingh, Corneille Ewango, and Roger Mundry. „The relationship between tool use and prey availability in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) of Northern Democratic Republic of Congo”. International Journal of Primatology, no. 41(6) (2020): 936–959.
Google Scholar

Horvath, Kelsey, Dario Angeletti, Giuseppe Nascetti, and Claudio Carere. „Invertebrate welfare: an overlooked issue”. Annali dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanità, no. 49 (1) (2013): 9–17.
Google Scholar

Johannsen, Kyle. Wild animal ethics. The Moral and Political Problem of Wild Animal Suffering. New York: Routledge, 2019.
Google Scholar

Johannsen, Kyle. „Animal rights and the problem of r-strategists”. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, no. 20(2) (2017): 333–345.
Google Scholar

Karasek, Tomasz, and Paweł Koperski. „NoMBSI: a New, Non-lethal Method for Benthos Sampling and Identification for use in biological monitoring of flowing waters: preliminary results”. Hydrobiologia, no. 751 (2015): 215–227.
Google Scholar

Karlsson, Dave, Emily Hartop, Mattias Forshage, Mathias Jaschhof, and Fredrik Ronquist. „The Swedish Malaise trap project: a 15 year retrospective on a countrywide insect inventory”. Biodiversity Data Journal, no. 8 (2020): 1–35.
Google Scholar

Kellert, Stephen R. „Values and Perceptions of Invertebrates”. Conservation Biology, no. 7(4) (1993): 845–855. http://www.jstor.com/stable/2386816.
Google Scholar

Key, Brian. „Why fish do not feel pain”. Animal Sentience, no. 1(3) (2016): 1.
Google Scholar

Kohda, Masanori, Shumpei Sogawa, Alex L. Jordan, Naoki Kubo, Satoshi Awata, Shun Satoh, Taiga Kobayashi, Akane Fujita, and Redouan Bshary. „Further evidence for the capacity of mirror self-recognition in cleaner fish and the significance of ecologically relevant marks”. PLoS Biol, no. 20(2) (2022): e3001529.
Google Scholar

Koperski, Paweł. „Freshwater invertebrates – neglected victims of biological monitoring: an ethical view”. Ethics & The Environment, no. 27(2) (2022): 29–57.
Google Scholar

Lejman, Jacek. „O zmyślności zwierząt. Rozważania wokół etyki zróżnicowanych natur”. W Dominika Dzwonkowska, Michał Latawiec, Dariusz Gzyra, Jacek Lejman, Mirosław Twardowski, Justyna Tymieniecka-Suchanek, Filozofia wobec świata zwierząt, 31–54. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego, 2015.
Google Scholar

Loukola, Olli J., Solvi, Cwyn, Coscos, Louie, and Lars Chittka. „Bumblebees show cognitive flexibility by improving on an observed complex behavior”. Science, no. 355(6327) (2017): 833–836.
Google Scholar

Mather, Jennifer A., and David M. Logue. „The bold and the spineless: Invertebrate personalities”. In Animal Personalities: Behavior, Physiology, and Evolution. Eds. Claudio Carere, and Dario Maestripieri. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.
Google Scholar

Mather, Jennifer A., and Claudio Carere. „Consider the Individual: Personality and Welfare in Invertebrates”. In The Welfare of Invertebrate Animals. Eds. Claudio Carere, and Jennifer Mather. Cham: Springer, 2019.
Google Scholar

Mather, Jennifer A. (2016). „An invertebrate perspective on pain”. Animal Sentience, no. 1(3): 12.
Google Scholar

Mather, Jennifer A. „Ethics and care: For animals, not just mammals”. Animals, no. 9(12) (2019): 1018.
Google Scholar

Mathers, Jennifer A. „Ethics and Care: For Animals, Not Just Mammals”. Animals, no. 9 (2019): 1018. doi:10.3390/ani9121018.
Google Scholar

Menzel, Randolf, Jacqueline Fuchs, Andreas Kirbach, Konstantin Lehmann, and Uwe Greggers. „Navigation and communication in honey bees”. In Honeybee Neurobiology and Behavior. Eds. Giovanni Galizia, Dorothea Eisenhardt, Martin Giurfa, s. 103–116. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012.
Google Scholar

Mikhalevich, Irina, and Richard Powell. „Minds without spines: Evolutionarily inclusive animal ethics”. Animal Sentience, no. 5 (2020): 1.
Google Scholar

Monsó, Susana, and Antonio J. Osuna-Mascaró. „Problems with basing insect ethics on individuals’ welfare”. Animal Sentience, no. 5(29) (2020): 8.
Google Scholar

Perry, Clint J., and Luigi Baciadonna. „Studying emotion in invertebrates: what has been done, what can be measured and what they can provide”. Journal of Experimental Biology, no. 220 (21) (2017): 3856–3868.
Google Scholar

Perry, Clint J., Andrew B. Barron, and Ken Cheng. „Invertebrate learning and cognition: relating phenomena to neural substrate”. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, no. 4 (2013): 561–582. WIREs Cogn Sci2013, 4:n/a. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1248
Google Scholar

Podręcznik do monitoringu elementów biologicznych i klasyfikacji stanu ekologicznego wód powierzchniowych. Aktualizacja metod. Red. Agnieszka Kolada. Warszawa: Główny Inspektorat Ochrony Środowiska, 2020.
Google Scholar

Probucka, Dorota. Prawa zwierząt. Kraków: Universitas, 2015.
Google Scholar

Regan, Tom. All That Dwell Therein: Animal Rights and Environmental Ethics. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982.
Google Scholar

Regan, Tom 1975. „Do Animals Have a Right to Life?”. The Canadian Journal of Philosophy, no. 5: 181–214.
Google Scholar

Regan, Tom. The Case for Animal Rights. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1983.
Google Scholar

Regan, Tom. Animal Rights, Human Wrongs: An Introduction to Moral Philosophy. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Washington DC, 2003.
Google Scholar

Regan, Tom. „Sentiency and Rights: Some Observations”. In From Darwin to Dawkins: The Science and Implications of Animal Sentience (2005). http://tomregan.info/interviews/sentiency-and-rights-some-observations [15.03.2019].
Google Scholar

Rozporządzenie Ministra Środowiska z dnia 16 grudnia 2016 r. w sprawie ochrony gatunkowej zwierząt. Dz.U. 2016 poz. 2183
Google Scholar

Rudy, Michał. Traktat o uśmiercaniu zwierząt. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu SWPS, 2019.
Google Scholar

Schneider-Mizell, Casey M., Stephan Gerhard, Mark Longair, Tom Kazimiers, Feng Li, Maarten F. Zwart, Andrew Champion, Frank M. Midgley, Richard D. Fetter, Stephan Saalfeld, and Albert Cardona. „Quantitative neuroanatomy for connectomics in Drosophila”. Elife, no. 5 (2016), e12059.
Google Scholar

Sherwin, Christopher M. „Can invertebrates suffer? Or, how robust is argument-by-analogy?”. Animal Welfare, no. 10(1) (2001): 103–118, 103.
Google Scholar

Schnell, Aleksander K., Piero Amodio, Markus Boeckle, and Nicola S. Clayton. „How intelligent is a cephalopod? Lessons from comparative cognition”. Biological Reviews, no. 96(1) (2021): 162–178.
Google Scholar

Singer, Peter. Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for our Treatment of Animals. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics, 2002.
Google Scholar

Singer, Peter. „Are Insects Conscious?”. Project Syndicate, 12.05.2016. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/are-insects-conscious-by-P.-singer-2016-05.
Google Scholar

Singer, Peter. Etyka praktyczna. Przekład Agata Sagan. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo „Książka i Wiedza”, 2003.
Google Scholar

Singer, Peter. The Expanding Circle: Ethics, Evolution, and Moral Progress. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981.
Google Scholar

Singer, Peter. Practical Ethics. Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Google Scholar

Singer, Peter. Practical Ethics. Third Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Google Scholar

Sømme, Lauritz S. Sentience and pain in invertebrates. Report to Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety. Ås–Oslo: Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 2005.
Google Scholar

Springer, Mark S., Michael J. Stanhope, Ole Madsen, and Wilfried W. de Jong. „Molecules consolidate the placental mammal tree”. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, no. 19 (2004).
Google Scholar

Toni, Mattia, Arianna Manciocco, Elisa Angiulli, Enrico Alleva, Carla Cioni, and Stefano Malavasi. „Assessing fish welfare in research and aquaculture, with a focus on European directives”. Animal, no. 13(1) (2019), 161–170.
Google Scholar

Ustawa z dnia 15 stycznia 2015 roku o ochronie zwierząt wykorzystywanych do celów naukowych lub edukacyjnych. Dz.U. z 2019 r. poz. 1392 ze zm.
Google Scholar

Ustawa z dnia 16 kwietnia 2004 r. o ochronie przyrody. Dz.U. z 2021 r. poz. 1098.
Google Scholar

Waal, Frans, de. Małpy i filozofowie. Skąd pochodzi moralność?. Przekład Michał Furman i Bartosz Brożek. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press, 2013.
Google Scholar

Webster, John. „Animal sentience and animal welfare: What is it to them and what is it to us?”. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, no. 1(100) (2006): 1–3.
Google Scholar

Zarosa, Urszula. Status moralny zwierząt. Warszawa: PWN, 2016.
Google Scholar