Baer, Karl Ernst von. „Welche Auffassung der lebenden Natur ist die richtige? Und wie ist diese Auffassung auf die Entomologie anzuwenden?”. In Karl Ernst von Baer. Reden gehalten in wissenschaflichen Versammlungen und kleinere Aufsatze vermischten Inhalts, 237–284. Bd. 1. St. Petersburg: H. Schmitzdorff, 1864.
Google Scholar

Bateson, Patrick, and Kevin N. Laland. „Tinbergen’s four questions: An appreciation and an update”. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 28, issue 12 (2013): 712–718.
Google Scholar

Brentari, Carlo. Jakob von Uexküll: The Discovery of the Umwelt between Biosemiotics and Theoretical Biology. Berlin: Springer, 2015.
Google Scholar

Bruneau, Thomas J. „Subjective time, social interaction, and personal identity”. In Inter­action and Identity, ed. by Hartmut B. Mokros, 97–115. Information and Behaviour, vol. 5. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1996.
Google Scholar

Bruneau, Thomas J. „Time, change, and sociocultural communication: A chronemic perspective”. Sign Systems Studies, vol. 35, no. 1/2 (2007): 89–117.
Google Scholar

Burghardt, Gordon M. „Amending Tinbergen: A fifth aim for ethology”. In Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes, and Animals, ed. by Robert W. Mitchell, Nicholas S. Thompson, and H. Lyn Miles, 254–276. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997.
Google Scholar

Burghardt, Gordon M. The Genesis of Animal Play: Testing the Limits. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2005.
Google Scholar

Coursil, Jacques. „Hidden principles of improvisation”. Sign Systems Studies, vol. 43, no. 2/3 (2015): 226–234.
Google Scholar

Deacon, Terrence. „The aesthetic faculty”. In The Artful Mind: Cognitive Science and the Riddle of Human Creativity, ed. by Mark Turner, 21–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Google Scholar

Deacon, Terrence. „The symbol concept”. In The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution, ed. by Kathleen R. Gibson and Maggie Tallerman, 393–405. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Google Scholar

Deacon, Terrence. The Symbolic Species: The Co-Evolution of Language and the Human Brain. London: Penguin, 1997.
Google Scholar

Deely, John. „The semiotic animal”. In Semiotics 2003: Semiotics and National Identity, ed. by Rodney Williamson, Leonard G. Sbrocchi, and John Deely, 111–126. New York: Legas, 2005.
Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. Kant and the Platypus: Essays on Language and Cognition. San Diego: Harcourt, 1999.
Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1976.
Google Scholar

Esbjörn-Hargens, Sean. „Animal worlds: The importance of biosemiotics for integral ecology”. In The Variety of Integral Ecologies: Nature, Culture, and Knowledge in the Planetary Era, ed. by Sam Mickey, Sean Kelly, and Adam Robbert, 279–302. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2017.
Google Scholar

Fraser, Julius Thomas. „The extended umwelt principle: Uexküll and the nature of time”. Semiotica, issue 134 (2001): 263–273.
Google Scholar

Fraser, Julius Thomas. Time as Conflict: A Scientific and Humanistic Study. Basel: Birkhauser Verlag, 1978.
Google Scholar

Fraser, Julius Thomas. Time, Conflict, and Human Values. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1999.
Google Scholar

Galantucci, Bruno, and Simon Garrod, eds. Experimental Semiotics: Studies on the emergence and evolution of human communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2012.
Google Scholar

Grandin, Temple, and Catherine Johnson. Animals in Translation: Using the Mysteries of Autism to Decode Animal Behavior. New York: Scribner Books, 2005.
Google Scholar

Hoffmeyer, Jesper. Biosemiotics: An Examination into the Signs of Life and the Life of Signs. Scranton: Scranton University Press, 2008.
Google Scholar

Hoffmeyer, Jesper. „Semiotic aspects of biology: Biosemiotics”. In Semiotics: A Handbook on the Sign-Theoretic Foundations of Nature and Culture, ed. by Roland Posner, Klaus Robering, and Thomas A. Sebeok, 2643–2666. Vol. 3. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2003.
Google Scholar

James, William. The Principles of Psychology. New York: H. Holt and Company, 1893.
Google Scholar

Kashima, Yoshihisa, and Nick Haslam. „Explanation and interpretation: An invitation to experimental semiotics”. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, vol. 28, issue 1 (2007): 234–256.
Google Scholar

Kull, Kalevi. „The biosemiotic concept of the species”. Biosemiotics, vol. 9, issue 1 (2016): 61–71.
Google Scholar

Kull, Kalevi. „Foundations for ecosemiotic deep ecology”. In The Space of Culture – the Placeof Nature in Estonia and Beyond, ed. by Tiina Peil, 69–75. Tartu: Tartu University Press, 2011.
Google Scholar

Kull, Kalevi. „Semiosis stems from logical incompatibility in organic nature: Why biophysics does not see meaning, while biosemiotics does”. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, vol. 119, issue 3 (2015): 616–621.
Google Scholar

Kull, Kalevi. „Umwelt and modelling”. In The Routledge Companion to Semiotics, ed. by Paul Cobley, 43–56. London: Routledge, 2010.
Google Scholar

Kull, Kalevi. „Zoosemiotics is the study of animal forms of knowing”. Semiotica, issue 198 (2014): 47–60.
Google Scholar

Kull, Kalevi, and Peeter Torop. „Biotranslation: Translation between umwelten”. In Readings in Zoosemiotics, ed. by Timo Maran, Dario Martinelli, and Aleksei Turovski, 411–425. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011.
Google Scholar

Magnani, Lorenzo. „Naturalizing logic: Errors of reasoning vindicated: Logic reapproaches cognitive science”. Journal of Applied Logic, vol. 13, issue 1 (2015): 13–36.
Google Scholar

Magnus, Riin. „Time-plans of the organisms: Jakob von Uexküll’s explorations into the temporal constitution of living beings”. Sign Systems Studies, vol. 39, no. 2/4 (2011): 37–57.
Google Scholar

Maran, Timo, Dario Martinelli, and Aleksei Turovski, eds. Readings in Zoosemiotics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011.
Google Scholar

Marler, Peter. „Affective and symbolic meaning: Some zoosemiotic speculations”. In Sight, Sound, and Sense, ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, 113–123. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1978.
Google Scholar

Martinelli, Dario. A Critical Companion to Zoosemiotics: People, Paths, Ideas. Berlin: Springer, 2010.
Google Scholar

Mendelson, Tamra C., Courtney L. Fitzpatrick, Mark E. Hauber, Charles H. Pence, Rafael L. Rodriguez, Rebecca J. Safran, Caitlin A. Stern, and Jeffrey R. Stevens. „Cognitive phenotypes and the evolution of animal decisions”. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, vol. 31, issue 11 (2016): 850–859.
Google Scholar

Michon, John A., Janet L. Jackson, and René J. Jorna. „Semiotic aspects of psychology: Psychosemiotics”. In Semiotics: A Handbook on the Sign-Theoretic Foundations of Nature and Culture, ed. by Roland Posner, Klaus Robering, and Thomas A. Sebeok, 2722–2758. Vol. 3. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2003.
Google Scholar

Moore, Bruce R. „The evolution of learning”. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 79, issue 2 (2004): 301–335.
Google Scholar

Müller, Andreas, and Joachim R. Wolff. „Semiotische Aspekte der Neurophysiologie: Neurosemiotik”. In Semiotics: A Handbook on the Sign-Theoretic Foundations of Nature and Culture, ed. by Roland Posner, Klaus Robering, and Thomas A. Sebeok, 2667–2698. Vol. 3. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2003.
Google Scholar

Nagel, Thomas. „What is it like to be a bat?”. The Philosophical Review, vol. 83, issue 4 (1974): 435–450.
Google Scholar

Nemirovsky, Paul. Aesthetic Forms of Expression as Information Delivery Units. MSc thesis. Cambrigde: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1999.
Google Scholar

Nemirovsky, Paul, and Glorianna Davenport. „Aesthetic forms of expression as information delivery units”. In Language, Vision, and Music: Selected Papers from the 8th International Workshop on the Cognitive Science of Language Processing, Galway, Ireland 1999, ed. by Paul Mc Kevitt, Seán Ó. Nualláin, and Conn Mulvihill, 255–270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2002.
Google Scholar

Pöppel, Ernst. „The brain’s way to create »nowness«”. In Time, Temporality, Now: Experiencing Time and Concepts of Time in an Interdisciplinary Perspective, ed. by Harald Atmanspacher and Eva Ruhnau, 107–120. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Google Scholar

Pöppel, Ernst, and Yan Bao. „Temporal windows as a bridge from objective to subjective time”. In Subjective Time: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Temporality, ed. by Valtteri Arstila and Dan Lloyd, 241–262. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2014.
Google Scholar

Rattasepp, Silver, and Kalevi Kull. „The semiotic species: Deelying with animals in philoso­phy”. The American Journal of Semiotics, vol. 32, issue 1/4 (2016): 35–48.
Google Scholar

Rodríguez Higuera, Claudio J., and Kalevi Kull. „The biosemiotic glossary project: The semiotic threshold”. Biosemiotics, vol. 10, issue 1 (2017): 109–126.
Google Scholar

Sebeok, Thomas A. „»Animal« in biological and semiotic perspective”. In What is an Animal?, ed. by Tim Ingold, 63–76. London: Unwin Hyman, 1988.
Google Scholar

Sebeok, Thomas A. Essays in Zoosemiotics. Toronto: Toronto Semiotic Circle, 1990.
Google Scholar

Sebeok, Thomas A. Perspectives in Zoosemiotics. The Hague: Mouton, 1972.
Google Scholar

Sebeok, Thomas A., ed. Animal Communication: Techniques of Study and Results of Research. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1968.
Google Scholar

Sebeok, Thomas A., ed. How Animals Communicate. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1977.
Google Scholar

Tulving, Endel. „Chronesthesia: Conscious awareness of subjective time”. In Principles of Frontal Lobe Functions, ed. by Donald T. Stuss and Robert T. Knight, 311–325. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Google Scholar

Uexküll, Jakob von. A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans, with A Theory of Meaning. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010 [1934].
Google Scholar

Uexküll, Jakob von. Theoretische Biologie. Berlin: Verlag von Julius Springer, 1928.
Google Scholar

Varela, Francisco J. „The specious present: A neurophenomenology of time consciousness”. In Naturalizing Phenomenology: Issues in Contemporary Phenomenology and Cognitive Science, ed. by Jean Petitot, Francisco J. Varela, Bernard Pachoud, and Jean-Michel Roy, 266–314. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999.
Google Scholar

Vehkavaara, Tommi. „Extended concept of knowledge for evolutionary epistemology and for biosemiotics: Hierarchies of storage and subject of knowledge”. In Emergence, Complexity, Hierarchy, Organization, ed. by George L. Farre and Tarkko Oksala, 207–216. Espoo: Finnish Academy of Technology, 1998.
Google Scholar

Weber, Andreas. The Biology of Wonder: Aliveness, Feeling and the Metamorphosis of Science. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers, 2016.
Google Scholar