Modifying Stuttering Attitudes: Who Changes and in What Direction?

Katarzyna Węsierska; Kenneth O. St. Louis; Isabella Reichel; Chelsea (Kuhn) Roche; Hossein Rezai; Fauzia Abdalla; Lejla Junuzović-Žunić; Aneta Przepiórka; Timothy Flynn; Elizabeth (Fisher)  Aliveto; Ann Beste-Guldborg; Agata Błachnio; Mohyeddin Teimouri Sangani; Benjamin Bolton-Grant; Salman Abdi

doi:10.31261/FL.2025.13.2.17

Published: 2025-12-23

2025

Modifying Stuttering Attitudes: Who Changes and in What Direction?

Katarzyna Węsierska

, Kenneth O. St. Louis

, Isabella Reichel

, Chelsea (Kuhn) Roche

, Hossein Rezai

, Fauzia Abdalla

, Lejla Junuzović-Žunić

, Aneta Przepiórka

, Timothy Flynn

, Elizabeth (Fisher) Aliveto

, Ann Beste-Guldborg

, Agata Błachnio

, Mohyeddin Teimouri Sangani

, Benjamin Bolton-Grant

, Salman Abdi

Section: Studies

https://doi.org/10.31261/FL.2025.13.2.17

Abstract

Previous studies show that interventions to improve attitudes toward stuttering yield inconsistent results on the Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes–Stuttering (POSHA–S). Comparisons of pre- and post-intervention samples indicate that success depends on the percentage of respondents who improved rather than the magnitude of change. A “crossover” effect emerged: respondents with the most positive pre-test attitudes showed lower post-test ratings, whereas those with the most negative pre-test attitudes showed the greatest improvement; respondents with intermediate attitudes showed little change. Similar patterns appeared in non-intervention samples, where one-third fell into positive, minimal, or negative change groups. The study analyzed 943 respondents from 29 intervention samples classified as unsuccessful (U), marginally successful (MS), successful (S), or very successful (VS), plus 345 respondents from 12 non-intervention samples. Using non-intervention data as a baseline, we calculated percentages shifting among the three change groups. In the VS category, interventions moved people from the negative and minimal change groups into the positive change group. In the S category, gains in the positive change group came from the negative change group. In the MS category, all intervention-related changes began in the negative change group, yielding modest growth in the positive and minimal change group. The U category showed shifts into both the positive and negative change group, mainly reducing the minimal change group. These findings suggest that interventions to improve attitudes toward stuttering should apply strategies tailored to individuals in positive, minimal, and negative change groups.

Keywords:

attitudes , change , intervention , POSHA–S , stuttering

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Węsierska, K., St. Louis, K. O., Reichel, I., Roche, C. (Kuhn), Rezai, H., Abdalla, F., … Abdi, S. (2025). Modifying Stuttering Attitudes: Who Changes and in What Direction?. Forum Lingwistyczne, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.31261/FL.2025.13.2.17

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf files under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International Licence: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.

1. Licence
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 licence.

2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.

If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, among others the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".

ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).

3. Users Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 licence, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.

4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.

I declare that in the case of a withdrawal of the text from the editorial process, which has not been agreed with the editorial team and/or the publisher of the journal or a simultaneous submission of the text to another publisher, I agree to cover all the expenses incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with processing my submission (including the cost of editorial reviews).

References

Abdalla, F. (2015). Changing attitudes toward stuttering. In K. O. St. Louis, (ed.), Stuttering meets stereotype, stigma, and discrimination: An overview of attitude research (pp. 106–129). West Virginia University Press.
Google Scholar

Abdalla, F., & St. Louis, K. O. (2014). Modifying attitudes of Arab school teachers toward stuttering. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 45, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1044/2013_LSHSS-13-0012.
Google Scholar

Abdi, S., Jalaei, Sh., Teimouri Sangani, M., & Pourmohammad, A. (2014).
Google Scholar

بومي†سازي†و†بررسي†روايي†و†پايايي†نسخه†فارسي
Google Scholar

" مقياس†سنجش†نگرش†عمومي†نسبت†به†ويژگ†يهاي†انساني†–لكنت"
Google Scholar

[Development and evaluation of psychometric properties of the Persian version of “Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes-Stuttering”]. New Scientific Research Journal of Rehabilitation, 9(5), 87–92. (In Persian)
Google Scholar

Andrews, G., Hoddinott, S., Craig, A., Howie, P., Feyer, A.-M., & Neilson, M. (1983). Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 48, 226–246.
Google Scholar

Barnett, A. G., van der Pols, J. C., & Dobson, A. J. (2005). Regression to the mean: What it is and how to deal with it. International Journal of Epidemiology, 34(1), 215–220. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyh299.
Google Scholar

Beste-Guldborg, A., St. Louis, K. O., & Shorts, J. E. (2015, November). Face-to-face interviews of people who stutter: Effects on attitudes of SLP students [Poster presentation]. Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Denver, CO.
Google Scholar

Bloodstein, O., Ratner, N. B., & Brundage, S. B. (2021). A handbook on stuttering. Plural Publishing.
Google Scholar

Bolton, B., Gibson, L., Holmes, J., & Rowland, C. (2017). Effects of an information workshop on attitudes of teachers who have children who stammer in their classes [Unpublished data]. Stammering Information Centre.
Google Scholar

Boyle, M. P., Dioguardi, L., & Pate, J. E. (2016). A comparison of three strategies for reducing the public stigma associated with stuttering. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 50, 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2016.09.004.
Google Scholar

Chandrabose, J. G., St. Louis, K. O., Pushpavathi, M., & Raoof, S. (2010). Awareness of stuttering among prospective teachers of Mysore. Journal of the All India Institute of Speech & Hearing (JAIISH), 29, 144–152.
Google Scholar

Flynn, T. W., & St. Louis, K. O. (2009, November). Measuring and changing negative stuttering stereotypes in adolescents [Poster presentation]. Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, New Orleans, LA.
Google Scholar

Flynn, T. W., & St. Louis, K. O. (2011). Changing adolescent attitudes toward stuttering. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 36, 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2011.04.002.
Google Scholar

Gottwald, S. L., Warner, R., Hartley, J., Fraas, M., Hawver, K., & St. Louis, K. O. (2011, November). Altering attitudes towards stuttering through the use of oral histories [Poster presentation]. Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, San Diego, CA.
Google Scholar

Gottwald, S., Kent, L., St. Louis, K. O., & Hartley, J. (2014, November). Altering attitudes towards stuttering through the use of oral histories [Poster presentation]. Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Orlando, FL.
Google Scholar

Holcombe, K., & Eisert, S. (2012) Understanding the impediment: Investigating the nature of people’s attitudes toward stutterers [Unpublished capstone paper]. Pacific Lutheran University.
Google Scholar

Hughes, S. (2015). Attitudes toward stuttering: An annotated bibliography. In K. O. St. Louis, (ed.), Stuttering meets stereotype, stigma, and discrimination: An overview of attitude research (pp. 310–350). West Virginia University Press.
Google Scholar

Johnson, W., & Associates (1959). The onset of stuttering. University of Minnesota Press.
Google Scholar

Junuzović-Žunić, L., Weidner, M. E., Reichel, I. K., Cook, S., St. Louis, K. O., & Ware, M. B. (2015). Effects of fluency disorders coursework on students’ stuttering attitudes in two countries. In K. O. St. Louis (ed.), Stuttering meets stereotype, stigma, and discrimination: An overview of attitude research (pp. 226–242). West Virginia University Press.
Google Scholar

Kestenbaum, J., & Khnonov, M. (2011) Effects of watching The King’s Speech movie on students’ attitudes toward stuttering [Unpublished capstone paper]. Brooklyn College, City University of New York.
Google Scholar

Kuhn, C. D., & St. Louis, K. O. (2015, November). Attitudes toward stuttering of middle school students before & after a stuttering video [Poster presentation]. Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Denver, CO.
Google Scholar

Langevin, M., & Prasad, N. N. (2012). A stuttering education and bullying awareness and prevention resource: A feasibility study. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 43, 344–358. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2012/11-0031).
Google Scholar

Panico, J., Daniels, D. E., Hughes, S., Smith, R. E., & Zelenak, J. (2018). Comparing perceptions of student teachers and regular education teachers toward students who stutter: A mixed-method approach. Speech, Language and Hearing, 21, 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/2050571X.2017.1391425.
Google Scholar

Reichel, I., & St. Louis, K. O. (2004). Effects of emotional intelligence training in graduate fluency disorders courses. In A. Packman, A. Meltzer & H. F. M. Peters (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on Fluency Disorders (pp. 474–481). Nijmegen University Press.
Google Scholar

Reichel, I., & St. Louis, K. O. (2007). Mitigating negative stereotyping of stuttering in a fluency disorders class. In J. Au-Yeung, M. M. Leahy (eds.), Research, treatment, and self-help in fluency disorders: New Horizons. Proceedings of the Fifth World Congress on Fluency Disorders (pp. 236–243). International Fluency Association, Electronic publication.
Google Scholar

Reichel, I. K., & St. Louis, K. O. (2011, November). Effects of multidisciplinary curricula in graduate fluency disorders courses [Seminar presentation]. Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, San Diego, CA.
Google Scholar

Spears, S., Hudock, D., Ramsdell-Hudock, H., Altieri, N., Vereen, L. G., & St. Louis, K. O. (2015, November). The effect of pseudostuttering on clinicians’ attitudes before participating in an interprofessional intensive stuttering clinic [Poster presentation]. Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Denver, CO.
Google Scholar

St. Louis, K. O. (2011). The Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes-Stuttering (POSHA–S): Summary framework and empirical comparisons. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 36, 256–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2011.02.003.
Google Scholar

St. Louis, K. O. (2012). Research and development for a public attitude instrument for stuttering. Journal of Communication Disorders, 45, 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2011.12.001.
Google Scholar

St. Louis, K. O. (2015). Epidemiology of public attitudes toward stuttering. In K. O. St. Louis (ed.), Stuttering meets stereotype, stigma, and discrimination: An overview of attitude research (pp. 7–42). West Virginia University Press.
Google Scholar

St. Louis, K. O. (2024). Predicting adult attitudes toward stuttering from an international database. Journal of Communication Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106457.
Google Scholar

St. Louis, K. O., Abdalla, F., Abdi, S., Aliveto, E., Beste-Guldborg, A., Błachnio, A., Bolton-Grant, B., Eisert, S., Flynn, T., Gottwald, S., Hartley, J., Hudock, D. Johnson, K. N., Junuzović-Žunić, L., Przepiórka, L., Pushpavathi, M., Reichel, I., Rezai, H., Roche, C., Spears, S., Teimouri Sangani, M., & Węsierska, K. (2024). Profiles of public attitude change regarding stuttering. Language and Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laheal.2024.08.001.
Google Scholar

St. Louis, K. O., Aliveto, E. F., Teymouri Sangani, M., Abdi, S., Rezai, H., Abdalla, F., Przepiórka, A., Błachnio, A., Węsierska, K., Junuzović-Žunić, L., Eisert, S., Roche, C. K., Reichel, I., Beste-Guldborg, A., Flynn, T., Bolton, B., Gottwald, S., Spears, S., Hudock, D., Hartley, J., Pushpavathi, M., & Johnson, K. N. (2024). Measuring public attitudes toward stuttering: Test-retest reliability revisited. Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders. https://www.e-cacd.org/detail/30011733.
Google Scholar

St. Louis, K. O., & Enoch, M. B. (2012, November). Stuttering coursework influences on undergraduate student attitudes [Poster presentation]. Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Atlanta, GA.
Google Scholar

St. Louis, K. O., Lubker, B. B., Yaruss, J. S., & Aliveto, E. F. (2009). Development of a prototype questionnaire to survey public attitudes toward stuttering: Reliability of the second prototype. Contemporary Issues in Communication Sciences and Disorders, 36, 101–107.
Google Scholar

St. Louis, K. O., Przepiórka, A. M, Beste-Guldborg, A., Williams, M. J., Błachnio, A., Guendouzi, J., Reichel, I. K., & Ware, M. B. (2014). Stuttering attitudes of students: Professional, intracultural, and international comparisons. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 39, 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2013.10.001.
Google Scholar

St. Louis, K. O., Remley, C. L., & Hancock, B. R. (2010, November). POSHA: Test-retest reliability of the final version [Poster presentation]. Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Philadelphia, PA.
Google Scholar

St. Louis, K. O., Węsierska, K., & Polewczyk, I. (2018). Improving Polish stuttering attitudes: An experimental study of teachers and university students. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27, 1195–1210. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-ODC11-17-0179.
Google Scholar

St. Louis, K. O., Węsierska, K., Przepiórka, A., Błachnio, A., Beucher, C., Abdalla, F., Flynn, T., Reichel, I., Beste-Guldborg, A., Junuzović-Žunić, L., Gottwald, S., Hartley, J., Eisert, S., Johnson, K., Bolton, B., Teimouri Sangani, M., Rezai, H., Abdi, S., Pushpavathi, M., Hudock, D., Spears, S., & Aliveto, E. (2020). Success in changing stuttering attitudes: A retrospective study of 29 intervention samples. Journal of Communication Disorders, 84, 1–18. 105972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2019.105972.
Google Scholar

St. Louis, K. O., Williams, M. J., Ware, M. B., Guendouzi, J., & Reichel, I. (2014). The Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes–Stuttering (POSHA–S) and Bipolar Adjective Scale (BAS): Aspects of validity. Journal of Communication Disorders, 50, 36–50.
Google Scholar

Stork, K., & Johnson, K. (2016). Effects of interviewing a person who stutters on SLP students’ attitudes toward stuttering [Unpublished manuscript]. University of Houston.
Google Scholar

Trochim, W. M. K. (2025). Regression to the mean. Web Center for Social Research Methods (2021). https://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/regrmean.php.
Google Scholar

Van Riper, C. (1973). The treatment of stuttering. Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar

Weidner, M. & St. Louis, K. O. (2023). Changing public attitudes toward stuttering. In H. Sønsterud, & K. Węsierska (eds.), Dialogue without barriers – A comprehensive speech therapy intervention in stuttering (English Version). Agere Aude Foundation for Knowledge and Social Dialogue.
Google Scholar

Węsierska, K., Błachnio, A., Przepiórka, A., & St. Louis, K. O. (2015, October). Zmiana postaw wobec jąkania w Polsce – wstępne doniesienia z badań [Changing attitudes towards stuttering in Poland: Preliminary study report] [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Speech-Language Therapy: Modern Trends in Logopaedic Diagnosis and Therapy, Chorzów, Poland.
Google Scholar

2025
Published: 2025-01-30

ISSN: 2449-9587

eISSN: 2450-2758

10.31261/FL

Publisher

Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego | University of Silesia Press

Licence CC

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Submit