Relationships Between Public Attitudes Toward Stuttering and Autonomic and Subjective Indices of Anxiety

Kenneth St. Louis; Özlem Öge-Daşdöğen; Lauren E. Johnson; Jennifer G. Litzinger; Lauren Myers; Jeremy Donai

doi:10.31261/FL.2022.10.01

Published: 2022-02-09

No. 10 (2022)

Relationships Between Public Attitudes Toward Stuttering and Autonomic and Subjective Indices of Anxiety

Kenneth St. Louis

, Özlem Öge-Daşdöğen

, Lauren E. Johnson

, Jennifer G. Litzinger

, Lauren Myers

, Jeremy Donai

Section: Studies

https://doi.org/10.31261/FL.2022.10.01

Abstract

Introduction: Research has shown that adults who stutter have reacted with increased skin conductance and lower heart rates when confronted with videos of severe stuttering compared to videos of fluent speech. It has not been clearly established how these physiological indices or autonomic arousals are related to stuttering attitudes. The current study sought to compare physiological and psychometric measures of anxiety with stuttering attitudes.
Method: In a multiple-baseline design, 18 normal hearing university students listened to short samples of stuttered, masked, and normally fluent speech while their skin conductance and heart rate variability were being monitored by an Empatica E4 wristband device. Pre-experimentally and after each speech condition, they rated their comfort level on a 1–9 scale. Participants filled out the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI ) (Spielberger, 1977) prior to the physiological measures and the short state anxiety inventory afterwards. At the end, they filled out the Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes–Stuttering (POSHA–S).
Results: No significant main effects were observed for either autonomic measure for the three speech conditions, but interactions were significant. Individual participant analysis revealed that every respondent reacted differently to the skin conductance or heart rate variability. By contrast, mean subjective comfort ratings were more often lower after hearing stuttered or masked speech and higher after hearing fluent speech. Correlations between all the measures and the POSHA–S summary scores revealed little relationship between the autonomic measures and stuttering attitudes, but higher levels of state or trait anxiety were associated with more positive beliefs about people who stutter. In contrast, lower levels of anxiety tended to be associated with more positive self-reactions to those who stutter.
Conclusion: This study did not replicate previous reports of heightened autonomic reactions to stuttering among nonstuttering adults, although psychometric measures suggest a relationship between anxiety and stuttering attitudes. Further research should explore these relationships, especially with young children.

Keywords:

stuttering attitudes , anxiety , autonomic measures , psychometric measures , POSHA–S

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

St. Louis, K., Öge-Daşdöğen, Özlem, Johnson, L. E., Litzinger, J. G., Myers, L., & Donai, J. (2022). Relationships Between Public Attitudes Toward Stuttering and Autonomic and Subjective Indices of Anxiety. Forum Lingwistyczne, (10), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.31261/FL.2022.10.01

Cited by / Share

References

Allard, E. R. & Williams, D. F. (2008). Listeners’ perceptions of speech and language disorders. Journal of Communication Disorders, 41(2), 108–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2007.05.002.
Google Scholar

Allport, G. W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
Google Scholar

Amick, L. J., Chang, S. E., Wade, J. & McAuley, J. D. (2017). Social and cognitive impressions of adults who do and do not stutter based on listeners’ perceptions of read-speech samples. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1148. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01148.
Google Scholar

Babbie, E. (2021). The Practice of Social Research, 15th ed. Centage Unlimited.
Google Scholar

Blumgart, E., Tran, Y. & Craig, A. (2010). Social anxiety disorder in adults who stutter. Depression and Anxiety, 27(7), 687–692. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20657.
Google Scholar

Bohner, G. & Dickel, N. (2011). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 391–417. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131609.
Google Scholar

Boucsein, W. (2012). Electrodermal Activity. 2nd ed. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1126-0.
Google Scholar

Boucsein, W., Fowles, D. C., Grimnes, S., Ben-Shakhar, G., Roth, W. T., Dawson, M. E. & Filion, D. L. (2012). Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements. Psychophysiology, 49, 1017–1034. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01384.x.
Google Scholar

Bowers, A. L., Crawcour, S. C., Saltuklaroglu, T. & Kalinowski, J. (2010). Gaze aversion to stuttered speech: A pilot study investigating differential visual attention to stuttered and fluent speech. “International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders” 45, 133–144. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682820902763951.
Google Scholar

Braithewaite, J. J., Watson, D. G., Jones, R. & Rowe, M. (2015). A guide for analysing electrodermal activity (EDA) & skin conductance responses (SCRs) for psychological experiments (Revised version: 2.0). Technical Report, 2nd version: Selective Attention & Awareness Laboratory (SAAL). Behavioural Brain Sciences Centre, University of Birmingham, UK.
Google Scholar

Denes, P. B. & Pinson, E. N. (1963). The Speech Chain: The Physics and Biology of Spoken Language. Bell Telephone Laboratories.
Google Scholar

Empatica (2018). Retrieved from https://www.empatica.com/research/e4/.
Google Scholar

Glover, H. L., St. Louis, K. O. & Weidner, M. E. (2019). Comparing stuttering attitudes of preschool through 5th grade children and their parents in a predominately rural Appalachian sample. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 59, 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2018.11.001.
Google Scholar

Guntupalli, V. K., Kalinowski, J., Nanjundeswaran, C., Saltuklaroglu, T. & Everhart, D. E. (2006). Psychophysiological responses of adults who do not stutter while listening to stuttering. International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 62(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.11.001.
Google Scholar

Guntupalli, V. K., Everhart, D. E., Kalinowski, J., Nanjundeswaran, C. & Saltuklaroglu, T. (2007). Emotional and physiological responses of fluent listeners while watching the speech of adults who stutter. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 42(2), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/10610270600850036.
Google Scholar

Guntupalli, V. K., Nanjundeswaran, C., Dayalu, V. N. and Kalinowski, J. (2012). Autonomic and emotional responses of graduate student clinicians in speech-language pathology to stuttered speech. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 47, 603–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00162.x.
Google Scholar

Hughes, S. (2015). Attitudes toward stuttering: An annotated bibliography. In K. O. St. Louis (Ed.), Stuttering Meets Stereotype, Stigma, and Discrimination: An Overview of Attitude Research (pp. 310–350). West Virginia University Press.
Google Scholar

Hughes, S. & Strugalla, E. A. (2015). Recognizing positive aspects of stuttering: A survey of the general public. In K. O. St. Louis (Ed.), Stuttering Meets Stereotype, Stigma, and Discrimination: An Overview of Attitude Research (pp. 176–186). West Virginia University Press.
Google Scholar

Kreibig, S. D. (2010). Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: A review. Biological Psychology, 84(3), 394–421. https://do.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.03.010.
Google Scholar

Levenson, R. W. (1992). Autonomic nervous system differences among emotions. Psychological Science, 3 (1), 23–27.
Google Scholar

MacKinnon, S. P., Hall, S. & MacIntyre, P. D. (2007). Origins of the stuttering stereotype: Stereotype formation through anchoring–adjustment. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 32(4), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2007.03.003.
Google Scholar

Mauss, I. B. & Robinson, M. D. (2009). Measures of emotion: A review. Cognition & Emotion, 23(2), 209–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930802204677.
Google Scholar

Nelson, H. (2020). Changing College Students’ Attitudes Toward People who Stutter. Unpublished Master’s thesis. St. Cloud State University.
Google Scholar

Özdemir, R. S., St. Louis, K. O. & Topbaş, S. (2011). Stuttering attitudes among Turkish family generations and neighbors from representative samples. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 36, 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2011.07.002.
Google Scholar

Panico, J., Healey, E. C., Brouwer, K. & Susca, M. (2005). Listener perceptions of stuttering across two presentation modes: A quantitative and qualitative approach. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 30(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2005.01.003.
Google Scholar

Park, J. H., Schaller, M. & Crandall, C. S. (2007). Pathogen-avoidance mechanisms and the stigmatization of obese people. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 410–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.05.008.
Google Scholar

Plexico, L. W., Hamilton, M. B., Hawkins, H. & Erath, S. (2019). The influence of workplace discrimination and vigilance on job satisfaction with people who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 62, 105725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2019.105725.
Google Scholar

Project Implicit Social Attitudes (2021). Retrieved at https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/.
Google Scholar

Richardson, D, C,. Griffin, N. K., Zaki, L., Stephenson, A., Yan, J., Curry, T., Noble, R., Hogan, J., Skipper, K. I. & Devlin, J. T. (2020). Engagement in video and audio narratives: Contrasting self-report and physiological measures. Scientific Reports, 10, 11298. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68253-2.
Google Scholar

Sinha, R., Lovallo, W. R. & Parsons, O. A. (1992). Cardiovascular differentiation emotions. Psychosomatic Medicine, 54(4), 422–435. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-199207000-00005.
Google Scholar

Spielberger, C. D. (1977). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults. Mind Garden, Inc.
Google Scholar

Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal Behavior. Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar

St. Louis, K. O. (2011). The Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes-Stuttering (POSHA–S): Summary framework and empirical comparisons. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 36, 256–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2011.02.003.
Google Scholar

St. Louis, K. O. (2012). Research and development for a public attitude instrument for stuttering. Journal of Communication Disorders, 45, 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2011.12.001.
Google Scholar

St. Louis, K. O. (2015). Epidemiology of public attitudes toward stuttering. In K. O. St. Louis (Ed.), Stuttering Meets Stereotype, Stigma, and Discrimination: An Overview of Attitude Research (pp. 7–42). West Virginia University Press.
Google Scholar

St. Louis, K. O., Kuhn, C. D. & Lytwak, L. (2015). The Appraisal of the Stuttering Environment (ASE): A new clinical tool to measure stuttering attitudes the client’s environment. In K. O.
Google Scholar

St. Louis (Ed.), Stuttering Meets Stereotype, Stigma, and Discrimination: An Overview of Attitude Research (pp. 255–273). West Virginia University Press.
Google Scholar

St. Louis, K. O. & Martin, R. R. (1978). The effect of motor speech awareness on stuttering. Human Communication (later changed to: Canadian Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology), 3, 159–169.
Google Scholar

St. Louis, K. O., Przepiórka, A. M, Beste-Guldborg, A., Williams, M. J., Błachnio, A., Guendouzi, J., Reichel, I. K., Ware, M. B. (2014). Stuttering attitudes of students: Professional, intracultural, and international comparisons. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 39, 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2013.10.001.
Google Scholar

St. Louis, K. O., Weidner, M. E., Putorek, M. A., Glover, H. L., Myers, L. E., Hall, B. M., Johnson, L. E. & Chichilla, J., G. (2018). Development of explicit knowledge of what “stuttering” means in preschool through 5th grade children. Poster presented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Boston, MA.
Google Scholar

Tichenor, S. E. & Yaruss, J. S. (2021). Variability of Stuttering: Behavior and Impact. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 30, 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00112.
Google Scholar

Tran, Y., Blumgart, E. & Craig, A. (2011). Subjective distress associated with chronic stuttering. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 36(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2010.12.003.
Google Scholar

Van Leeuwen, F., Hunt, D. F. & Park, J. H. (2015). Is obesity stigma based on perceptions of appearance or character? Theory, evidence, and directions for further study. Evolutionary Psychology, 13 (3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704915600565.
Google Scholar

Van Riper, C. (1971). The Nature of Stuttering. Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar

Walden, T. A. & Lesner, T. A. (2018). Examining implicit and explicit attitudes toward stuttering. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 57, 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2018.06.001.
Google Scholar

Weidner, M. E. & St. Louis, K. O. (2014). The Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes–Stuttering/Child (POSHA–S/Child). Populore.
Google Scholar

Weidner, M. E., St. Louis, K. O., Burgess, M. E. & LeMasters, S. N. (2015). Attitudes toward stuttering of nonstuttering preschool and kindergarten children: A comparison using a standard instrument prototype. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 44, 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2015.03.003.
Google Scholar

Weidner, M. E., St. Louis, K. O., Nakıscı, E. & Özdemir, R. S. (2017). A comparison of attitudes towards stuttering of non-stuttering preschoolers in the United States and Turkey. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 64(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajcd.v64i1.178.
Google Scholar

Weidner, M. E., Junuzović-Žunić, L. & St. Louis, K. O. (2020). A comparison of stuttering attitudes among nonstuttering children and parents in Bosnia & Herzegovina. Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders, 5, 42–53. https://doi.org/10.21849/cacd.2020.00199.
Google Scholar

White, P. A. & Collins, S. R. (1984). Stereotype formation by inference: A possible explanation for the” stutterer” stereotype. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 27(4), 567–570. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2704.567.
Google Scholar

Woods, C. L. & Williams, D. E. (1976). Traits attributed to stuttering and normally fluent males. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 19(2), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1902.267.
Google Scholar

Zhang, J., Kalinowski, J., Saltluklaroglu, T. & Hudock, D. (2010). Stuttered and fluent speakers’ heart rate and skin conductance in response to fluent and stuttered speech. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 45, 670–680. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682820903391385.
Google Scholar

No. 10 (2022)
Published: 2022-07-19

ISSN: 2449-9587

eISSN: 2450-2758

10.31261/FL

Publisher

Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego | University of Silesia Press

Submit

Relationships Between Public Attitudes Toward Stuttering and Autonomic and Subjective Indices of Anxiety

Abstract

Keywords:

Kenneth St. Louis

Özlem Öge-Daşdöğen

Lauren E. Johnson

Jennifer G. Litzinger

Lauren Myers

Jeremy Donai

Information