Er(r)go,
the focus of this issue, assembled largely by Leszek Drong, is on theory as a tool for changing reality, that is on neopragmatism. Here are the rhizomes marking out the discursive space and the tangled paths of the volume: textualism―anti-textualism―essentialism―anti-essentialism―foundationism―anti-foundationism―antifundationist fundamentalism―strong anti-foundationism―weak anti-foundationism―ethics―aesthetics―aesthetical ethics―identity―self―integrity―soma―logos―understanding―interpretation―interpretive communities―intentionalism―the proper reading―the truth of the text―Truth―relativism―objectivism―rhetoric―rhetoricity―performativity―the rhetoric of the obvious―modes of persuasion―local truth―consensus―constructivism―intentio operis―intentio auctoris―paninterpretationism―interpretative monism―hermeneutical universalism................................................................
These intellectual convolutions are crowned with three essays by adversaries / allies: Richard Rorty, Stanley Fish and Richard Schusterman. What follows is the usual sequence of varia, anticipations, and reviews, with one alteration, however. As I already anticipated in the previous issue (but which – by some mischevious misprint was not reflected on the covers), “Er(r)go will be created by an extended editorial team of literary and cultural theorists, who will continue the thought, or rather the way of thinking, initiated by the former seminar. With the belief that these changes will enrich the journal, let us then wait for the moment in which we will unexpectedly look back with nostalgia at the time when those changes were made.”
Wojciech Kalaga
No. 49 (2024)
Published: 2024-12-30